Back to @rorysutherland's profile

Rory Sutherland engagement report

@rorysutherland - 164K followers on X

Measured over 7 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 24, 2026.

Engagement

Per follower
0.035%
of 164K followers
Per impression
0.307%
19K views on a typical post
Reach
11.5%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
58
interactions (median)
Saved
0.09%
17 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.43/day
active 30% of days
Peak time
15:00 UTC
Thursday

Early reading. We have captured 7 original posts for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.

A typical post picks up 58 interactions against 164K followers, an engagement rate of 0.035%. Posts are seen about 19K times each, and 0.307% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 11.5% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.4 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 7 posts sampled, 43% carry an image or video and 57% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 67K interactions, about 177x its own typical post. Only 7 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

Measured over 7 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 24, 2026.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.035%, Rory Sutherland sits above the 25th percentile of the 200,661 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.141%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.141%
p750.67%
p902.53%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 200,661 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,898 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.141%
75th percentile0.67%
90th percentile2.53%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 15:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 15:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 15:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video43% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link57% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 43% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 57% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 139 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 15, 2026177x their median

    Someone once stopped me as I was stepping out of my Lambo “How many starving people could you have fed with the money you spent on that?” I told him the truth: “I don't know. But it fed the 1,800 families of the people who built it. It fed the designers. The carbon-fiber suppliers. The tyre manufacturers. The 300 technicians who spent hundreds of hours hand-crafting this machine with pride.” That’s the difference. Socialism demands you divide the pie Capitalism pays people to bake a bigger one Do you understand?

    57K7.9K1.8K4732.6M viewsView on X
  • Sep 17, 2026119x their median

    The executives said the boardroom Wi-Fi “feels slow.” Speed test: 487 Mbps. Apparently 487 Mbps has bad energy. So I created a new network: EXECUTIVE_PRIORITY_5G Same access points. Same internet connection. Same VLAN. I just gave it a more expensive name. Connected the CEO. He opened a website and immediately said: “Oh wow, this is way faster.” By lunch, five VPs had asked for access. I told them executive bandwidth is limited and I can only approve users with a genuine business requirement. They are now competing for access to Wi-Fi they already had. Performance is unchanged. Satisfaction is through the roof.

    43K1.7K3501551.2M viewsView on X
  • Sep 11, 202624x their median

    $3 million in Palo Alto, CA: garage can almost fit a car! $3 million in Waco, TX: a literal castle (+ $300,000 for fun) https://t.co/u7HTT2ZcXc

    8.5K183347951.5M viewsView on X
  • Sep 21, 20262.1x their median

    The BBC can’t even bring themselves to mention this. What IS wrong with them? https://t.co/hTFDIJdRib

    602126621775K viewsView on X
  • Sep 19, 2026

    Unscientific but welcome . Jeremy Clarkson in the Sun today. https://t.co/Okicxis8xu

    373337816245K viewsView on X
  • Sep 15, 2026

    I have observed this on many occasions. For instance, a friend of mine who is a brilliant planner and a brilliant copywriter found it almost impossible to gain employment. It may be part of a wider phenomenon which explains the popularity of performance marketing. Because performance marketing is entirely devoted to achieving one narrow thing, it appears 100% effective at that one thing. Other communication forms which achieve multiple objectives don't have a pet single metric all of their own to make themselves look good.

    3754630833K viewsView on X
  • Sep 15, 2026

    To all young people who want to work but can't find a job, or who are working but can't afford a home, and are wondering why: This situation had it roots with the last Labour government who were in power when the 2008 crash happened and took decisions we're still paying for today. The Coalition and Tory governments that followed made it worse, by implementing more policies that pumped house prices but not wages (eg v low interest rates and Help to Buy). But none of them, neither the previous Tory or Labour governments did as much damage as this Labour government has done in just two short years. They have stepped on the heads of your drowning prospects to make sure they don't survive. Yes, it is possible to get into a home for some, but it shouldn't be this difficult. You are experiencing the consequences of decades of bad government policy, driven mostly by the desire to win votes rather than benefit voters, and it's not your fault. Do not blame boomers, they didn't make the policies that they have benefitted from (but you can blame them for not recognising how much harder you have it than they did, in terms of home affordability). For as long as voters keep electing ANY party who will perpetuate these policies, nothing will improve. We must keep fighting against the demon of debt expansion, (eg Help to Buy, Longer mortgage terms, larger salary multiples) because until lending is reined in, this will keep getting worse. And the economy and wages will keep suffering as housing hoovers up everyone's money.

    29156396106K viewsView on X
  • Sep 13, 2026

    This deserves a place in the pantheon of all-time greatest online comments. https://t.co/ql2QRaaq2j

    337218038K viewsView on X
  • Sep 18, 2026

    "Yes, we are all individuals." Queue at Apple Store Regent St. https://t.co/srGOd0fTBT

    2771150834K viewsView on X
  • Sep 21, 2026

    The political right is obsessed with narrow self-interest. The political left is obsessed with altruism. What gets lost in this is that there is a third form of government activity where money is spent to the benefit of everyone. https://t.co/vyOvqRVH9Y

    7065009.1K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 58 interactions against 164K followers, an engagement rate of 0.035%. Posts are seen about 19K times each, and 0.307% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 11.5% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.4 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 7 posts sampled, 43% carry an image or video and 57% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 67K interactions, about 177x its own typical post. Only 7 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

What is Rory Sutherland's engagement rate on X?
Rory Sutherland (@rorysutherland) has an engagement rate of 0.035%, based on the median interactions across 7 original posts from the last 30 days against 164,057 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.035%, Rory Sutherland sits above the 25th percentile of the 200,661 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @rorysutherland have real engagement?
There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
When does @rorysutherland post?
Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.43 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going