Unilever engagement report
@Unilever - 229K followers on X
Measured over 11 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 30, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 10 interactions against 229K followers, an engagement rate of 0.004%. Measured over 11 original posts, its engagement rate beats 15% of 20,183 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 1.5K times each, and 0.668% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.654% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.37 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 11 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 64% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 39 interactions, about 3.9x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #unileverbrands, #unileverinnovation, #unilevernews.
Measured over 11 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 30, 2026. Recurring tags: #unileverbrands, #unileverinnovation, #unilevernews.
Compared with accounts its own size
Unilever's engagement rate beats 15% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,183 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 33% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.004%, Unilever sits above the 10th percentile of the 202,368 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.142% |
| 75th percentile | 0.672% |
| 90th percentile | 2.54% |
| 99th percentile | 82.6% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 14:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 100% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 64% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | +15% | +14% to +16% | 32K |
- 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 64% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
- Its average post runs 284 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Aug 10, 20263.9x their median
Rexona’s FIFA World Cup 2026™ activation turned a Singapore train into an unexpected and immersive brand experience. Reaching an estimated 600,000+ commuters and generating around 1 million organic views within 24 hours of its first campaign post. #UnileverPCxFIFAWorldCup https://t.co/t33qm6AJGX
- Jul 31, 20262.4x their median
Unilever 2026 First Half Results Take a look at the brands, categories and innovations driving the performance of our four business groups, all of which delivered volume-led growth. Read more: https://t.co/NwoMbf4HJB #UnileverResults https://t.co/swDxbVdhpB
- Sep 10, 20262.2x their median
70% of home care consumers want products that last longer. 45% want non-toxic ingredients. We developed Cif Infinite Clean to meet those demands. Read more: https://t.co/YlAujWRFIL #UnileverInnovation https://t.co/zOYNGOqOAV
- Aug 24, 20261.9x their median
We’re using AI to build a competitive advantage across our €12.9bn Foods business. From innovation to personalisation and discovery, AI keeps Power Brands like Hellmann’s and Knorr front and centre for consumers. https://t.co/BRT6zFSM3u #UnileverInnovation https://t.co/4vXsD3Okn2
- Jul 28, 20261.9x their median
Unilever’s 2026 First Half Results show underlying sales growth was 4.8% with volume growth of 4.2%. This was led by our Power Brands, which grew underlying sales by 6.0% with 5.4% volume growth. Read more here: https://t.co/jOQSFgd1x1 #UnileverResults $ULVR $UNA $UL https://t.co/TlZM0NJMzP
- Jul 30, 20261.7x their median
Why is cultural relevance crucial in marketing? Brand leaders from Unilever’s Rexona, Dove, Axe and Dove Men+Care share how our brands turned connection into conversion with fans during the FIFA World Cup 2026™. #UnileverBrands #UnileverPCXFIFAWorldCup2026 https://t.co/Zko4k807YH
- Jul 28, 20261.6x their median
Unilever’s 2026 First Half Results show underlying sales growth of 4.8% with volume growth of 4.2%. All Business Groups delivered volume-led growth. Read more here: https://t.co/XJfkc2LsFO #UnileverResults $ULVR $UNA $UL https://t.co/XQWKJtaXgG
- Jul 9, 20261.5x their median
An @adage article on Unilever’s sponsorship of the FIFA World Cup 2026™ looks at how we’re using influencer content to reach fans far beyond stadiums, and how nano creators are critical to converting sales. Read more: https://t.co/tQSHZmY48W #UnileverInsights https://t.co/ypiav8s0IN
- Sep 21, 2026
In an article for @Inc, Shama Hyder shares how Unilever’s creative marketing around the FIFA World Cup 2026™ stopped being a cost centre and instead became key to how the company compounds. Read more: https://t.co/HFml2XSLg2 #UnileverBrands #UnileverNews https://t.co/DQw2tetrNY
- Aug 21, 2026
TRESemmé Professional has launched in the UK & Ireland – the biggest transformation in the brand’s history. The range of high-performance products are science-led, claims-backed and designed to deliver on increasing demand for premium haircare. Read more https://t.co/4USIdipEpl https://t.co/BK4LjDqY8t
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 10 interactions against 229K followers, an engagement rate of 0.004%. Measured over 11 original posts, its engagement rate beats 15% of 20,183 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 1.5K times each, and 0.668% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.654% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.37 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 11 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 64% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 39 interactions, about 3.9x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #unileverbrands, #unileverinnovation, #unilevernews.
- What is Unilever's engagement rate on X?
- Unilever (@Unilever) has an engagement rate of 0.004%, based on the median interactions across 11 original posts from the last 30 days against 228,575 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.004%, Unilever sits above the 10th percentile of the 202,368 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @Unilever have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 15% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,183 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @Unilever post?
- Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.37 posts per day across the measured window.