Back to @zrebroia's profile

zre engagement report

@zrebroia - 250K followers on X

Measured over 13 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 26, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.014%
of 250K followers
Per impression
0.234%
15K views on a typical post
Reach
5.95%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
35
interactions (median)
Saved
0.127%
19 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.03/day
active 73% of days
Peak time
07:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 35 interactions against 250K followers, an engagement rate of 0.014%. Measured over 13 original posts, its engagement rate beats 28% of 19,932 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 15K times each, and 0.234% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.97% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 73% of days. Most posts go out around 07:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 13 posts sampled, 85% carry an image or video and 23% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.9K interactions, about 53x its own typical post.

Measured over 13 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 26, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

zre's engagement rate beats 28% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (19,932 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 14% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.014%, zre sits above the 10th percentile of the 201,787 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.142%
p750.672%
p902.54%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 201,787 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,901 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.142%
75th percentile0.672%
90th percentile2.54%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 07:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 07:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 07:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video85% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link23% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 85% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 23% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 263 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 4, 202653x their median

    🚨ESTO ES UNA LOCURA Un desarrollador chino acaba de lanzar una herramienta GRATUITA capaz de crear vídeos automáticamente para TikTok, Reels y YouTube Shorts. Se llama MoneyPrinterTurbo. Y ya ha superado las 100.000 estrellas en GitHub. Así funciona: 1. Introduces un tema o una palabra clave 2. La IA genera el guion, la narración y los subtítulos 3. Busca el material visual, edita el vídeo y te entrega el resultado final Todo ocurre en un único flujo de trabajo. Guárdate esta herramienta. Estoy seguro de que puedes sacarle muchísimo partido. Enlace abajo👇

    1.6K197253229K viewsView on X
  • Sep 24, 202634x their median

    Stanford acaba de filtrar esta clase gratuita que explica cómo funcionan Claude y ChatGPT desde el interior La mayoría desperdicia el 90% de su potencial Stanford te lo enseña en 1 hora y 50 minutos Guarda esto en favoritos para que no lo pierdas. https://t.co/2XWEXOHSJr

    992188144135K viewsView on X
  • Sep 25, 20266.4x their median

    CLAUDE ADS LE DA A TU AGENTE CONTROL TOTAL SOBRE 12 PLATAFORMAS DE ADS CON AUDITORÍAS, PLANES Y CAMBIOS EN CUENTA Gestionar campañas en Google, Meta, TikTok, LinkedIn y 8 plataformas más a la vez es trabajo de un equipo entero. Claude Ads lo convierte en comandos que Claude Code ejecuta con evidencia, scoring determinista y sin tocar nada sin tu aprobación. → Auditorías con evidencia fechada y nivel de confianza explícito por plataforma → Planes de campaña, presupuesto, experimentos y medición → Creación de copy, briefs de imagen y vídeo, y assets de producto → Monitoreo de pacing, fatiga creativa, tracking y política → Read-only por defecto: ningún cambio se aplica sin pasar 6 gates de seguridad → Compatible con Claude Code, Codex, Gemini, Cursor y Windsurf → 8.5k stars, MIT, 12 plataformas cubiertas Para los que gestionamos paid media, esto es lo más cercano a tener un analista de cuentas disponible 24/7. repoo en el primer comentario

    1761925422K viewsView on X
  • Sep 21, 20265.6x their median

    jev es una LOCURA. en 40 segundos desglosó 724 anuncios activos de 37 marcas. cada hook. cada formato. oferta. CTA. etapa de awareness. desajustes con la landing. y gastó 9 céntimos en tokens. https://t.co/JEv7GgxPDy

    1541821319K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 20265.5x their median

    https://t.co/OfXmIvYEFb

    17587319K viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 20265.0x their median

    Introducing the Luel Speech Platform Generate production quality speech audio, through our Studio or over the API, with voices from Bhutan to Morocco Built with Luel's 800,000+ contributor network across 96+ countries. Your first 30 minutes are included when you sign up ⬇️ https://t.co/RzkdBTEMFA

    1382619335K viewsView on X
  • Sep 12, 2026

    https://t.co/xyMyPge541

    3158215K viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 2026

    https://t.co/ix8ewTOa5B

    30203195K viewsView on X
  • Sep 16, 2026

    🚨Esta persona te enseña en 10 minutos cómo crear un tutorial sencillo de sitios web 3D con IA. Guárdalo; te será útil. https://t.co/cv9smpa8Qj

    201505.1K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 2026

    Una cafetería usa inteligencia artificial en sus cámaras de seguridad habituales para monitorizar en tiempo real a baristas y clientes. El sistema mide tazas preparadas, tiempos de espera y rendimiento, democratizando una tecnología antes exclusiva de grandes corporaciones. https://t.co/737rPhyo87

    240009.0K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 35 interactions against 250K followers, an engagement rate of 0.014%. Measured over 13 original posts, its engagement rate beats 28% of 19,932 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 15K times each, and 0.234% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.97% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 73% of days. Most posts go out around 07:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 13 posts sampled, 85% carry an image or video and 23% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.9K interactions, about 53x its own typical post.

What is zre's engagement rate on X?
zre (@zrebroia) has an engagement rate of 0.014%, based on the median interactions across 13 original posts from the last 30 days against 250,190 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.014%, zre sits above the 10th percentile of the 201,787 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @zrebroia have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 28% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (19,932 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @zrebroia post?
Most posts go out around 07:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.03 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going