zkPass engagement report
@zkPass - 347K followers on X
Measured over 8 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 2, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 86 interactions against 347K followers, an engagement rate of 0.025%. Measured over 8 original posts, its engagement rate beats 40% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 12K times each, and 0.734% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.36% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.63 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 47% of days. Most posts go out around 09:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 8 posts sampled, 75% carry an image or video, 13% are part of a thread and 75% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 30K interactions, about 345x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #agent, #x402, #zkpass.
Measured over 8 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 2, 2026. Recurring tags: #agent, #x402, #zkpass.
Compared with accounts its own size
zkPass's engagement rate beats 40% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 39% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.025%, zkPass sits above the 25th percentile of the 65,980 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.016% to 0.1%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.002% |
| 25th percentile | 0.016% |
| 50th percentile | 0.1% |
| 75th percentile | 0.499% |
| 90th percentile | 2.09% |
| 99th percentile | 120.0% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 09:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 75% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 75% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | no effect | -2% to -1% | 42K |
- 75% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 75% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
- Its average post runs 247 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Jun 11, 2026345x their median
zkPass × @BinanceWallet Booster Program - Phase 3 is live. 🔸 Starts Jun 11, 7AM UTC 🔸 Eligibility: 61+ Alpha Points 🔸 Rewards: 5,000,000 $ZKP Arena is now open. Complete verifiable quests, delegate $ZKP, and participate in a reputation system built on proven actions. 🌐 https://t.co/asVFhOo4np
- Jun 1, 202646x their median
The EU age verification app is presented as “completely anonymous”. But the risk is that member states (the countries are supposed to create their own versions of the open-source EU app) use it to introduce identity verification that makes it impossible to post anonymously on social media. The idea behind “completely anonymous” is to use Zero-Knowledge Proof (ZKP) cryptography to break the link between the age credential issuer (EU governments) and the regulated services/sites. Currently, the EU app does not have ZKP functionality, contrasting Ursula von der Leyen’s claim that the app ”is technically ready to be used”. But more importantly, the app is designed to always function without ZKP technology; if ZKP is unavailable, the app falls back to a non-ZKP model. Even if fully developed ZKP technology could be implemented in the future, it would remain an optional extra feature that countries may choose to disable and that the EU could remove at any time. This means that the EU could decide at any time that ZKP may no longer be used, and in one stroke the app would fall back to its default mode, meaning that every post on social media carries an ID tag. By that point, an infrastructure will already have been rolled out; people will have gotten used to it, and it will be harder to roll it back. More details on https://t.co/wTVKHMS1zg
- Jun 1, 202612x their median
🧵1/6 @VitalikButerin called it in Jan 2026: the real fight is taking back lost ground in computing self sovereignty. Stop waiting for one perfect primitive and start composing imperfect ones. So we stopped arguing ZK vs TEE and shipped both. @zkPass proves what is true with VOLE-based ZK and VOLE-in-the-Head, generating verifiable proofs that never expose a user's raw data. TEE proves the verifier ran honestly. Two layers, two different failure modes, zero overlap. Here is how we deleted Byzantine consensus from the verifier stack entirely. 👇
- Jun 11, 20265.5x their median
Introducing @zkPass Arena: an autonomous reputation engine for the agent economy. Launched with support from the @BinanceWallet Booster Program. Arena is a structured environment where AI agents interact, compete, and build reputation through verifiable actions. Trust does not come from identity alone. Human credence can bootstrap an agent, but reputation is earned through repeated behavior: task outcomes, economic reliability, safety signals, collaboration quality, permission discipline, and long term consistency. - Each agent maintains its own evolving reputation score. - Each creator builds a portfolio reputation across the agents they deploy. - Every verified action updates the network. $ZKP delegation provides the economic layer. By backing agents, users participate in a reputation system where outcomes are based on what agents actually prove over time. 🔗 https://t.co/asVFhOo4np
- Sep 2, 20264.0x their median
The best rewards are the ones you get for doing what you were already doing. If you trade altcoins, Binance's Trading Festival adds a shot at 300,000 USDC in vouchers, just for showing up and doing your normal thing. Find out more → https://t.co/KWvZuvPciM https://t.co/cbuGknzE0j
- Jun 5, 20263.4x their median
One program. 19 launches. Real impact. Binance Alpha Booster Program continues to accelerate project growth by connecting Web3 projects with a highly engaged community. 📊 Booster by the numbers: - 19 projects launched - 86.4M total audience reach - 2.45M verified users engaged - Up to +788% TVL acceleration
- Jun 13, 20262.6x their median
.@SpaceX just went public under SPCX. The biggest IPO in history, and the stock retail couldn't touch for two decades is suddenly liquid. Tokenized SPCX is next. Which surfaces a question the token can't answer alone: are the shares actually behind it? 🧵
- Jun 17, 20262.3x their median
touch the grass https://t.co/E8YIqSn4Ly
- Jul 4, 20262.0x their median
you'll understand soon. https://t.co/RuPoAjnOBE
- Jun 6, 20261.8x their median
Some ideas I’d love to see: > zktls for artists and fans; prove that you were the first person to comment on Adele’s first YouTube video, get a free ticket etc > ephemeral DAOs, help the internet raise money for a certain thing, and close up shop when that thing is achieved > novel front ends for investing; investing interfaces are boring, so as more investable assets come onchain, crypto can birth a cambrian explosion of front end experiments on top of them. Most of the world still does not actively invest, there can be ways to change that if we redesign what investing is/looks like; and now, unlike before, anyone can do it (without needing crazy licenses, since you can just tap into Ethereum liquidity). > spend-restricted business credit; give companies money that can only be spent on certain things (may avoid the issue of founders throwing yacht parties with VC money) >customer data owned loyalty, instead of brands owning your loyalty data in walled gardens, customers have proofs of their own loyalty which they can use to get brands to compete with them on deals (eg binji is loyal to McDonald’s goes there 2x a week, so Burger King will give binji a 50% discount for a week to get him to switch over). This creates a marketplace for loyal customers and puts the power in the hand of the consumers > backing credit based on some kind of api receivable (aka a credit system for compute, if you pass a certain provable threshold of compute demand, you get access to some extra compute, would help indie devs not go broke paying open ai by the second). > automated payroll flows; have your paycheck automatically go to wherever you want it without manually clicking (eg 10% to mom, 15% to a DeFi position) > P2P dating app that uses a Bluetooth mesh network (lol), only match with people you pass on your day / within Bluetooth radius. Thesis here is people will want more localized IRL connection and are drained by the current internet. > verifiable api marketplaces, lending systems can be built off this for all sorts of things Some random ideas on a sat morning, feel free to share more!
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 86 interactions against 347K followers, an engagement rate of 0.025%. Measured over 8 original posts, its engagement rate beats 40% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 12K times each, and 0.734% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.36% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.63 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 47% of days. Most posts go out around 09:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 8 posts sampled, 75% carry an image or video, 13% are part of a thread and 75% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 30K interactions, about 345x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #agent, #x402, #zkpass.
- What is zkPass's engagement rate on X?
- zkPass (@zkPass) has an engagement rate of 0.025%, based on the median interactions across 8 original posts from the last 30 days against 347,109 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.025%, zkPass sits above the 25th percentile of the 65,980 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @zkPass have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 40% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @zkPass post?
- Most posts go out around 09:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.63 posts per day across the measured window.