Back to @zfj82's profile

زياد جوهرجي ZJ engagement report

@zfj82 - 114K followers on X

Measured over 4 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 9, 2026.

Engagement

Per follower
0.015%
of 114K followers
Per impression
0.417%
4.2K views on a typical post
Reach
3.69%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
18
interactions (median)
Saved
0.024%
1 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.17/day
active 17% of days
Peak time
06:00 UTC
Sunday

Early reading. We have captured 4 original posts for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.

A typical post picks up 18 interactions against 114K followers, an engagement rate of 0.015%. Posts are seen about 4.2K times each, and 0.417% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.69% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.17 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 17% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 06:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 4 posts sampled, 50% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 31 interactions, about 1.7x its own typical post. Only 4 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

Measured over 4 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 9, 2026.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.015%, زياد جوهرجي ZJ sits above the 10th percentile of the 205,261 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,261 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 06:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 06:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 06:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video50% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 50% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 253 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 13, 20261.7x their median

    بخصوص هتافات «جوتا» الطقطقة والتنمر أصبحا من أكثر الظواهر المؤذية انتشارًا في السنوات الأخيرة، وتأثيرهما على الأطفال والمراهقين قد يمتد لسنوات، ويترك آثارًا نفسية وعقدًا تؤثر في شخصياتهم مستقبلًا. ومع انتشار السوشال ميديا، خصوصًا في مجتمع كرة القدم، أصبح التنمر والبذاءة وكأنهما جزء طبيعي من التشجيع والمنافسة. لكن أن يصل الأمر إلى الهتاف باسم شخص متوفى لمجرد استفزاز صديقه، فهذا تجاوز لكل حدود الإنسانية. أن يردد بعض الجماهير اسم «جوتا» أكثر من مرة وفي مباريات مختلفة، وهم يعلمون أن نيفيش فقد صديق عمره، فقط بهدف التأثير عليه نفسيًا.. هل وصلنا فعلًا إلى هذه المرحلة من انعدام الإنسانية؟ لن أتحدث عن أخلاق المسلم أو تعاليم الأديان؛ فبغض النظر عن الدين أو المعتقد، هناك أمور ترفضها الإنسانية بالفطرة. السؤال الأهم: ما الصورة التي ننقلها للعالم عن مجتمع كرة القدم عندما يصبح موت الإنسان مادة للطقطقة والاستفزاز؟

    2272012K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 2026

    القانون يسمح بإلغاء أو تأجيل المباراة بسبب سوء الأحوال الجوية، ولكن هل يُقصد بسوء الأحوال الجوية فقط الأمطار والثلوج والرياح؟ ماذا عن ارتفاع درجات الحرارة إلى منتصف الأربعينات، مع رطوبة غير طبيعية وأجواء خانقة تجعل التنفس والمجهود البدني أكثر صعوبة؟ هل يمكن اعتبار هذه الظروف الجوية طبيعية ومناسبة لممارسة رياضة تتطلب مجهودًا بدنيًا عاليًا لمدة 90 دقيقة؟ أنا أتحدث هنا من الناحية الصحية فقط، بعيدًا تمامًا عن أي ميول أو انتماءات رياضية. عندما تصل درجات الحرارة إلى هذه المستويات مع ارتفاع الرطوبة، فإن الضغط البدني على اللاعبين يصبح كبيرًا جدًا، ويزداد خطر الجفاف والإجهاد الحراري والإغماء، خصوصًا مع المجهود البدني المتواصل. وإذا كان ما حدث بالأمس من حالات إغماء بالعشرات بين الجماهير صحيحًا، فهذا بحد ذاته مؤشر يستحق التوقف عنده والتساؤل: إذا كان هذا هو تأثير الأجواء على الجماهير، فما بالك باللاعبين الذين يبذلون مجهودًا بدنيًا عاليًا طوال المباراة؟ اللعب في مثل هذه الظروف، دون تقييم واضح لمستوى الخطورة واتخاذ الإجراءات المناسبة، قد يعرض اللاعبين والجماهير لمخاطر صحية حقيقية. لذلك أستغرب جدًا من قرار لجنة المسابقات بالسماح بإقامة المباراة في مثل هذه الأجواء، خصوصًا إذا كانت المعايير الصحية المتعلقة بالحرارة والرطوبة والإجهاد الحراري تسمح بتأجيل المباراة أو إيقافها. مرة أخرى، حديثي هنا ليس له علاقة بنتيجة المباراة أو أي ميول رياضية، وإنما هو تساؤل من منظور صحي بحت: هل كانت الظروف الجوية بالأمس آمنة فعلًا لممارسة رياضة عالية الشدة؟

    119408.1K viewsView on X
  • Sep 10, 2026

    الحمدلله على نعمه التي لا تعد ولا تحصى. اللهم أجعلنا من الشاكرين لنعمك. اللهمَّ أطعم كل جائع وأغني كل فقير وأشفي كل مريض.

    138004.5K viewsView on X
  • Sep 8, 2026

    أسوأ ما في كرة القدم أنك قد تقضي 90 دقيقة ترفع ضغطك، تعصب، تزعل وتتوتر… على نتيجة مباراة، ثم تكتشف أن فريقك ولاعبيه أكملوا حياتهم بشكل طبيعي ينعمون بالماليين، بينما أنت دفعت الثمن من أعصابك وصحتك

    75804.7K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 2026

    https://t.co/eHTFa2cpkg

    72804.1K viewsView on X
  • Sep 15, 2026

    ربِ اجعل هذا البلد آمناً https://t.co/tzKM7T2kWW

    86003.5K viewsView on X
  • Aug 5, 2026

    اللهم إني أسألك خير هذا اليوم: فتحه، ونصره، ونوره، وبركته، وهداه، وأعوذ بك من شر ما فيه وشر ما بعده.

    86005.2K viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 2026

    حفظ الله سمو سيدي كل عام وانتم بخير يوم ميلاد سعيد مبارك 31/8/1985 https://t.co/otjAYmreOH

    44004.0K viewsView on X
  • Jul 28, 2026

    الحمد لله ربّ العالمين، الّذي أحصى كلّ شيء عددًا، وجعل لكلّ شيء أمداً، ولا يُشرك في حُكمهِ أحداً.

    71004.1K viewsView on X
  • Jul 30, 2026

    الحمد لله دائماً وأبداً على نعمه التي لا تحصى، وفضله العظيم الذي يغمرنا في كل وقت وحين

    43005.2K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 18 interactions against 114K followers, an engagement rate of 0.015%. Posts are seen about 4.2K times each, and 0.417% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.69% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.17 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 17% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 06:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 4 posts sampled, 50% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 31 interactions, about 1.7x its own typical post. Only 4 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

What is زياد جوهرجي ZJ's engagement rate on X?
زياد جوهرجي ZJ (@zfj82) has an engagement rate of 0.015%, based on the median interactions across 4 original posts from the last 30 days against 113,588 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.015%, زياد جوهرجي ZJ sits above the 10th percentile of the 205,261 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @zfj82 have real engagement?
There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
When does @zfj82 post?
Most posts go out around 06:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.17 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going