Back to @zephyr_z9's profile

Zephyr engagement report

@zephyr_z9 - 175K followers on X

Measured over 9 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 20, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.208%
of 175K followers
Per impression
0.713%
51K views on a typical post
Reach
29.2%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
363
interactions (median)
Saved
0.118%
60 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.87/day
active 30% of days
Peak time
12:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 363 interactions against 175K followers, an engagement rate of 0.208%. Measured over 9 original posts, its engagement rate beats 72% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 51K times each, and 0.713% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 29.1% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 9 posts sampled, 56% carry an image or video and 22% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 3.5K interactions, about 9.6x its own typical post.

Measured over 9 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 20, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Zephyr's engagement rate beats 72% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 34% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.208%, Zephyr sits above the 50th percentile of the 204,694 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.143% to 0.677%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.677%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,694 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,880 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.677%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 12:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 12:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 12:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video56% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link22% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 56% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 22% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 365 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Oct 15, 20269.6x their median

    I've got a theory Since Anthropic started blocking distillation and patched most exploits Chinese models really slowed down it might be the reason why we haven't seen new releases since GLM 5.3 and Kimi K3.

    3.2K5222334461K viewsView on X
  • Jul 7, 20264.6x their median

    Looking at the current market mood, it feels like memory is going down either way. Case 1: If they deliver earnings above market expectations: “Isn’t this peak-out? Do you really think these profits are sustainable? Memory is cyclical, and this is the top.” Case 2: If they miss market expectations: “Memory is over now. Even after excluding bonus provisions, they should have easily printed KRW90tn. Sell on news.”

    1.5K808723398K viewsView on X
  • Sep 17, 20264.6x their median

    Scaling will continue until morale improves https://t.co/FJ1RXiOsOq

    1.5K674332131K viewsView on X
  • May 9, 20264.0x their median

    I think OpenAI + Anthropic will end 2026 with a combined ARR of $160B-$200B

    1.2K367518574K viewsView on X
  • Sep 16, 20263.4x their median

    SK HYNIX AND INTEL ARE IN TALKS TO MAKE MEMORY CHIPS IN THE US $INTC $SKHY

    1.1K933135224K viewsView on X
  • Oct 16, 20263.3x their median

    If Chinese players want to open source models above 2T parameters or trained on over 10e26 FLOPS then they will need to get permission from MOFCOM https://t.co/8DR0XKQYUk

    1.0K767234149K viewsView on X
  • Sep 19, 20263.1x their median

    Looking at Muse and Instinct, you really get a sense of how quickly things have progressed since OpenClaw. It feels like only yesterday that Jensen Huang was singing OpenClaw’s praises. Oh, and I’ve heard Meta is renting a massive number of virtual machines for Muse.

    1.0K343920495K viewsView on X
  • Oct 15, 20262.3x their median

    ANTHROPIC IPO VALUATION EXPECTATIONS DROP TO ~$1.5T FROM $2T: RTRS Some existing and prospective investors are reconsidering the Claude maker's valuation ahead of its anticipated November IPO, according to Reuters. Anthropic reported Q3 revenue of $16.8B, up 45% QoQ, compared with growth of more than 100% in Q2, when revenue reached $11.6B. Despite reporting adjusted profitability, the slowdown disappointed some investors, with a broader tech selloff and concerns over rising AI infrastructure costs adding pressure. The company has committed to spending at least $518B on cloud computing and infrastructure over the next decade. Source: Reuters.

    639766358238K viewsView on X
  • Sep 15, 20262.1x their median

    Great blog post Would recommend reading it https://t.co/fcm9YbDZO5 https://t.co/ac7XuQ2lPN

    692556163K viewsView on X
  • Sep 17, 2026

    SPACEX PLANS TO ACQUIRE DATA FOR AI MODELS FROM FAILED STARTUPS.

    411222632348K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 363 interactions against 175K followers, an engagement rate of 0.208%. Measured over 9 original posts, its engagement rate beats 72% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 51K times each, and 0.713% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 29.1% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 9 posts sampled, 56% carry an image or video and 22% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 3.5K interactions, about 9.6x its own typical post.

What is Zephyr's engagement rate on X?
Zephyr (@zephyr_z9) has an engagement rate of 0.208%, based on the median interactions across 9 original posts from the last 30 days against 175,075 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.208%, Zephyr sits above the 50th percentile of the 204,694 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @zephyr_z9 have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 72% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @zephyr_z9 post?
Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.87 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going