Zélia Duncan 🏳️🌈 engagement report
@zeliaduncan - 587K followers on X
Measured over 17 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 10, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 1.4K interactions against 587K followers, an engagement rate of 0.231%. Measured over 17 original posts, its engagement rate beats 83% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 13K times each, and 10.1% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.28% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 17 posts sampled, 12% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 22K interactions, about 16x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #lulapresidente, #lula13.
Measured over 17 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 10, 2026. Recurring tags: #lulapresidente, #lula13.
Compared with accounts its own size
Zélia Duncan 🏳️🌈's engagement rate beats 83% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 98% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.231%, Zélia Duncan 🏳️🌈 sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,676 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.143% to 0.679%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.679% |
| 90th percentile | 2.56% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 11:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 12% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 0% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | -3% | -3% to -2% | 54K |
- 12% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 105 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Sep 2, 202616x their median
Vorcaro + Moraes: é escândalo. Vorcaro + Mendonça: é normal. Vorcaro + Flávio: é normal. Vorcaro + Jaques Wagner: é escândalo. Vorcaro + Gonet: é escândalo. Vorcaro + Claudio Castro: é normal. A régua muda conforme o CPF e o partido.
- Oct 1, 202612x their median
O clima de enterro na Globo News com o flop do debate. A cara de cu da mumia merval vendo um jurista dizer que a decisão da juíza de mandar a Globo tirar o púlpito vazio do Lula está correta https://t.co/lIEy6wnfla
- Jul 4, 202612x their median
Hoje eu fui atacado no centro do Rio por 2 bandidos provocadores diferentes e seus respectivos comparsas. Um deles é o mesmo que era do MBL e que atacou covardemente minha mãe. Foi a 8ª vez que ele faz isso. Mantive a calma e registrei o que estava ocorrendo junto à autoridade policial. Por que eu incomodo tanto essas quadrilhas? É coincidência que isso tenha acontecido após o evento histórico da bancada radical no Circo Voador ontem? Quem está dando dinheiro pra eles? Hoje a tática foi essa: paciência, sem recuo, firmes na rua e estamos tomando todas as medidas cabíveis.
- Jul 7, 20266.3x their median
Faz tempo que a prioridade de Neymar não é jogar bola. Agora ele está livre pra fazer o que mais gosta. E nós, livres dele.
- Sep 2, 20264.2x their median
URGENTE: acabou de ser divulgado pela Revista Veja que Augusto Cury utilizou os mesmos INFLUENCIADORES DO BANCO MASTER pra poder crescer nas redes sociais. Quando vão investigar isso? https://t.co/u4s3Thpk2D
- Sep 2, 20263.0x their median
eu não sou contra investigar, sou contra escolher a quem investigar!
- Oct 7, 20262.8x their median
Saiu o plano de F Bolsonaro. Congelar aposentadorias e tirar verba da saúde. Tá no jornal. Que tal? #lulapresidente
- Sep 9, 20262.7x their median
Qualquer candidato deveria apoiar quebra de sigilo, numa hora dessas! Só eu acho isso?
- Aug 6, 20262.4x their median
Eu não sei de ninguém que fosse chamar para vice de uma chapa de presidente de um país, alguém investigado por estupro de vulnerável. Seria estúpido demais, não é? Pois é...
- Oct 4, 20262.1x their median
"Não estamos vivendo tempos normais" (Miguel Lago)
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 1.4K interactions against 587K followers, an engagement rate of 0.231%. Measured over 17 original posts, its engagement rate beats 83% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 13K times each, and 10.1% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.28% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 17 posts sampled, 12% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 22K interactions, about 16x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #lulapresidente, #lula13.
- What is Zélia Duncan 🏳️🌈's engagement rate on X?
- Zélia Duncan 🏳️🌈 (@zeliaduncan) has an engagement rate of 0.231%, based on the median interactions across 17 original posts from the last 30 days against 586,897 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.231%, Zélia Duncan 🏳️🌈 sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,676 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @zeliaduncan have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 83% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @zeliaduncan post?
- Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.8 posts per day across the measured window.