YZi Labs engagement report
@yzilabs - 752K followers on X
Measured over 17 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 29, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 134 interactions against 752K followers, an engagement rate of 0.018%. Measured over 17 original posts, its engagement rate beats 42% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 29K times each, and 0.464% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.84% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.97 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 60% of days. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 17 posts sampled, 94% carry an image or video, 12% are part of a thread and 24% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 728 interactions, about 5.4x its own typical post.
Measured over 17 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 29, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
YZi Labs's engagement rate beats 42% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 29% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.018%, YZi Labs sits above the 10th percentile of the 204,798 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.678% |
| 90th percentile | 2.55% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 14:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 94% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 24% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | +15% | +14% to +16% | 32K |
- 94% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 24% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 519 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Aug 17, 20265.4x their median
The wait is finally over. HertzFlow Mainnet is live. 🥁 Introducing Season 1: Genesis Vault Pre-deposit. 🔗 https://t.co/1cPowYKAZN Full details below 👇 https://t.co/hUrCuyP1Mh
- Aug 24, 20264.2x their median
In two days, @EASYResidency S4 founders take the stage for Demo Day. 🇧🇹 This summer, we came to Bhutan — in the heart of the Himalayas — to build across stablecoins, payments, DeFi, AI, and beyond. Here’s a glimpse into the founders’ journey with YZi Labs. https://t.co/lHFxujSdew
- Jun 29, 20262.1x their median
🟡 Hiring this week across the YZi Labs portfolio: @allscaleio → Country Community MOD · Business Development @termix_ai → Market Development Lead · Product Manager @APRO_Oracle @predictdotfun @StableStock @Hertzflow_xyz continues to hire. Explore open roles at https://t.co/El2iRiW3nB.
- Aug 25, 20262.4x their median
https://t.co/1uYHdw9ODS
- Aug 13, 20262.1x their median
https://t.co/yRnQdJ1MtE
- Aug 31, 20262.0x their median
“RWA is going to grow. Every country and every company should look at how to leverage this growth.” — @cz_binance At @EASYResidency S4 Demo Day, CZ explained why he changed his mind about RWAs. Demand is growing across tokenized assets, from U.S. Treasuries to equities such as bStocks. The opportunity is two-sided: investors gain 24/7 access to markets previously out of reach, while companies and governments can bring local equities and sovereign bonds to a global investor base.
- Aug 29, 20261.9x their median
“AI trading will likely come before AI payments.” — @cz_binance at @EASYResidency S4 Demo Day During his fireside with @ellazhang516, CZ explained that payments aren’t the immediate bottleneck for most AI users -- they can still pay with their own cards. Trading is different. It demands real-time analysis, faster decisions and constant execution, making human intervention increasingly inefficient. Rather than AI companies moving into payments first, crypto players may lead by bringing AI into trading.
- Jul 7, 20261.9x their median
https://t.co/KLFzg0XZ1K
- Jul 13, 20261.8x their median
This week's YZi Talent roles are with @Aster_DEX — where crypto, stocks, commodities, and more can be traded on-chain, with privacy built in. 5 roles open, from Backend Developer (Java) → PM → BD. Come build the future of on-chain trading 👉 https://t.co/gVSMY9HEUr https://t.co/W8h0ufbi29
- Jul 15, 20261.8x their median
Crypto payments still face friction across user education, product usability, and regulation. For startups, the key is to overcome the friction, pick one wedge, and go deep. — @cz_binance That could be: > one high-volume remittance corridor, like UAE → Philippines or UAE → India > one underserved geography > one new category, like payments for AI agents Win the wedge. Build the foothold. Then earn the right to expand.
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 134 interactions against 752K followers, an engagement rate of 0.018%. Measured over 17 original posts, its engagement rate beats 42% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 29K times each, and 0.464% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.84% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.97 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 60% of days. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 17 posts sampled, 94% carry an image or video, 12% are part of a thread and 24% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 728 interactions, about 5.4x its own typical post.
- What is YZi Labs's engagement rate on X?
- YZi Labs (@yzilabs) has an engagement rate of 0.018%, based on the median interactions across 17 original posts from the last 30 days against 752,157 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.018%, YZi Labs sits above the 10th percentile of the 204,798 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @yzilabs have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 42% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @yzilabs post?
- Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.97 posts per day across the measured window.