Back to @yyds123888's profile

币圈福利哥 engagement report

@yyds123888 - 128K followers on X

Measured over 39 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 1, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.092%
of 128K followers
Per impression
0.277%
44K views on a typical post
Reach
33.4%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
121
interactions (median)
Saved
0.009%
4 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.07/day
active 63% of days
Peak time
14:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 121 interactions against 128K followers, an engagement rate of 0.092%. Measured over 39 original posts, its engagement rate beats 52% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 44K times each, and 0.277% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 34.2% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 63% of days. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 39 posts sampled, 85% carry an image or video, 5% are part of a thread and 5% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 853 interactions, about 7.0x its own typical post.

Measured over 39 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 1, 2026. Recurring tag: #币安中秋登月计划.

Compared with accounts its own size

币圈福利哥's engagement rate beats 52% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 15% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.092%, 币圈福利哥 sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,956 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,956 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 14:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video85% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link5% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 85% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 5% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 177 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • May 31, 20257.0x their median

    现在除了 BTC ,山寨币都是谁钻谁死。 从 $TRUMP 之后,我就再也没格局过,哪怕少赚我也要跑。这次 $BOME 我在0.001714买入,在0.002971高点跑了。 BOME 在这一个月时间里,就经历了从翻倍到腰斩。这样一个洗了快一年的老币,这么快从起飞到谷底,说明市场真的进入牛尾了。 时代在改变,这个跟玩币的人群也有关系,越来越多的00后入场,能看到新一代节奏明显变快了,一天一个热点,他们这些人女朋友都换的快,更何况手里的这些山寨币。。。

    471223573167K viewsView on X
  • Sep 22, 20263.2x their median

    BIT 中秋礼盒来咯 🎁 这个中秋,不送月饼,送一场真正能睡得着的团圆 🎑 礼盒里有三件为睡眠准备的东西: 🛏️ 亚朵慢回弹记忆棉枕 慢回弹贴合肩颈,出差回家都能带着走。 👕 竹纤维亲肤睡衣套装 柔软透气,夜里翻身也不扎人。 😴 丝质柔肤眼罩 丝质面层贴脸,遮光也更舒服。 月圆人安,高枕无忧 🌕 https://t.co/TAAnHyiITA

    14760172828K viewsView on X
  • Sep 13, 20262.3x their median

    别炒菜了,爆仓啦。 现实中,很多厨师、滴滴司机、外卖员都喜欢玩高倍合约。 有个小镇赌徒,父母省吃俭用一辈子,掏空积蓄拿出 80w 给他买房,他却用来玩合约。刚开始,他把 80w 玩到了 180w,心里盘算着只要 $ZK 涨到 0.3,首付就能变全款了。 结果 ZK 最高价定格在 0.295,随之而来的是一个接一个的瀑布洗脸。当天晚上,他就跟女朋友分了手。他把手机关机,不敢回家,不敢告诉家人,甚至连遗书都写好了,一度想过要离开这个世界。 如果你的本金不是自己的,一定不要用来赌博。这就是 CZ 说的:绝对不能梭哈。

    1777944219K viewsView on X
  • Sep 17, 20261.8x their median

    YouTube 博主这么强吗? 有两个 00 后创业者做了一个 MEME 项目,到处跑会找投资人。 正规的平台和机构一听说是 MEME,纷纷拒绝。这时,旁边有个 YouTube 博主听得津津有味,表示想看一下 CA。发现合约很干净后,他就问两人需要多少钱。 两个 00 后说要 10 万美元。这个 YouTube 博主听后笑了:“这么点钱还用拉投资啊?我就能帮你们把这个盘子做起来。” 当天,CA 发到他的会员群后就涨了 50 倍,而且流动性持续流入了一天一夜。因为他群里很多人连币都不会充,都是临时在群里学怎么充币、怎么打土狗。 卧槽,这才是新鲜血液,这才是优质社区啊。

    124297072K viewsView on X
  • Sep 26, 20261.7x their median

    很多人担心 BG 开放提现后会发生挤兑,历史上银行也发生过挤兑。 1931 年 9 月,长江发生特大水灾,陈光甫创办的上海商业储蓄银行汉口分行有一批抵押食盐被淹。随后,市场传出商储损失惨重、可能倒闭的消息,引发挤兑,无数人挤在银行门口取钱。 陈光甫无奈之下,只好求助于杜月笙。杜月笙只说了一句:“明早开门之前,在商储见。” 次日上午,商储银行门口来了一队汽车。杜月笙和商界的许多老板下了车,走进银行。不一会儿,银行工作人员报出:“杜老板存钱 300 万”“黄老板存钱 100 万”“李老板存钱 50 万”。围在银行门口的人见这么多老板来存钱,放下心来,纷纷离去。 以前的银行没有实行 1:1 储备,所以发生挤兑时往往没有足够的资金应对。BG 有 1:1 储备资金,处理这种情况会更从容。 挤兑只是一时的,只要人们确认提现没有问题,恐慌情绪就会逐渐消散,一切也会恢复正常。

    860121051K viewsView on X
  • Sep 27, 20261.7x their median

    一个假rpc骗了1000万rmb 骗子的手段真的永远在创新 防不胜防 https://t.co/2wVbXLToJ3

    157635788K viewsView on X
  • Sep 21, 20261.6x their median

    好消息:马斯克奶了! 坏消息:被马斯克奶死了! https://t.co/CtSo5nSxaW

    1043822117K viewsView on X
  • Sep 25, 2026

    为什么 Bitget 今天遭遇安全事件后,会有超过百位 KOL 自发声援,币安、Bybit、MEXC 等多家交易所高层也公开发推支持? 1. 创新 Bitget 本身就是一家敢于创新的交易所。2025 年率先提出并落地 UEX(Universal Exchange)全景交易所,随后上线美股代币和美股合约。进入 2026 年,美股和 TradFi 也成了多家头部交易所重点布局的方向。 2. 口碑 2024 年 10 月 7 日, $BGB 价格闪崩。平台币出现这种事故,对任何交易所都是一次考验。Bitget 在 24 小时内公布全额赔付方案,在 72 小时内完成赔付。 2026 年 8 月 9 日, $TUT、龙虾 $LOBSTER 和 $BICO 合约出现异常价格波动,导致部分空头仓位被强制平仓。Bitget 随后启动赔付,据公开报道,赔付规模约为 4000 万美元。 3. 高效 从家印入职第一天开始,他就把“今日事今日毕”当作工作准则。对他来说,明天不是区块链的节奏,今天的问题就要今天处理。 4. 种善因,得善果 2025 年 Bybit 被盗约 14.6 亿美元后,据 Ben Zhou 后来回忆,Bitget 是第一个出手帮助的交易所。Bitget 向 Bybit 转入 4 万枚 ETH,当时价值约 1.05 亿美元,而且没有要求抵押,也没有收取利息。 5. 人格魅力 家印一直把 Bitget 当成自己的事业,CEO Gracy 也是。安全事件发生后,两人第一时间投入处理,持续发推、回复用户,几乎连轴转。Bitget 还承诺每小时更新一次进展,持续安抚用户并更新进展。 站在一个普通人的立场,发生这样的事情肯定非常痛心,这也属于难以预料的突发事件。我觉得,在力所能及的情况下,出于人道主义考虑,只要自己的资金安全,就应当向 Bitget 伸出援手。@Bitgetyaya @Bitget_zh @xiejiayinBitget @GracyBitget

    112660255K viewsView on X
  • Sep 19, 2026

    若不是亲眼所见,我都不敢相信。 Arc 豪掷 1 万美金,给早期合格应用构建者颁发20份 500 USDC的微型资助。 车头镭射猫前两天在推特上随手发的红包都比 Arc 给的多,穷都写在脸上了,你让大家怎么敢在 Arc 链上梭哈? https://t.co/YzLIrrJISn

    110354257K viewsView on X
  • Sep 24, 2026

    币安这双德训鞋,我试穿了,脚感比LV软,比古驰硬一点,属于一个适中的脚感,舒适度刚刚好。 @binancezh @heyibinance @binance @pearbinance @moonkimbinance https://t.co/D374UDMvnm

    102063032K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#币安中秋登月计划

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 121 interactions against 128K followers, an engagement rate of 0.092%. Measured over 39 original posts, its engagement rate beats 52% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 44K times each, and 0.277% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 34.2% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 63% of days. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 39 posts sampled, 85% carry an image or video, 5% are part of a thread and 5% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 853 interactions, about 7.0x its own typical post.

What is 币圈福利哥's engagement rate on X?
币圈福利哥 (@yyds123888) has an engagement rate of 0.092%, based on the median interactions across 39 original posts from the last 30 days against 127,809 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.092%, 币圈福利哥 sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,956 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @yyds123888 have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 52% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @yyds123888 post?
Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.07 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going