Back to @youssef_hussen's profile

Joe engagement report

@youssef_hussen - 2.1M followers on X

Measured over 2 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 28, 2026.

Engagement

Per follower
0.186%
of 2.1M followers
Per impression
0.479%
814K views on a typical post
Reach
38.8%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
3.9K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.1%
810 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.57/day
active 63% of days
Peak time
07:00 UTC
Wednesday

Early reading. We have captured 2 original posts for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.

A typical post picks up 3.9K interactions against 2.1M followers, an engagement rate of 0.186%. Posts are seen about 814K times each, and 0.479% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 38.8% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 63% of days. Most posts go out around 07:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 2 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 27K interactions, about 6.8x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #عاجل, #اليمن, #السعودية. Only 2 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

Measured over 2 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 28, 2026. Recurring tags: #عاجل, #اليمن, #السعودية.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.186%, Joe sits above the 50th percentile of the 212,270 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.146% to 0.695%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.146%
p750.695%
p902.61%
p9983.1%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 212,270 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,455 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.146%
75th percentile0.695%
90th percentile2.61%
99th percentile83.1%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 07:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 07:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 07:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 894 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 4, 20266.8x their median

    There is no shortage of issues regarding FIFA. Let me start by clarifying what some of these are from an FA perspective, in particular that of Jordan going into a World Cup for the first time. We are a small country with a minimal budget for our FA and had to deal with enormous hurdles. First, getting our fans into the USA: not all were granted VISAS, even though they had tickets -which we also know were sold at exorbitant prices. Secondly, we are being taxed by the US govt through FIFA for our participation. Money that should go to players and staff. This was not the case for those who played and set up camp in Canada and Mexico. But we happened to be in the USA so now we face these huge costs in taxes for having participated. Thirdly we have been waiting for reward money for our players since December for the Arab cup in Qatar, which is a FIFA event. The money our team should receive for having reached the final has not been delivered yet, while at the same time FIFA brags about how many billions they have in reserve. It is clear the problem really is with leadership. For months, FIFA has been refusing to help us on any of these or other matters- until it was verbally communicated to me during the World Cup that if I endorsed Infantino it would go a long way to helping our FA out. We pride ourselves in Jordan in upholding ethical values. We did not endorse him before and certainly will not now. But the whole situation amounts to blackmail and we refuse to give in to that.

    21K4.2K4266604.9M viewsView on X
  • Jul 22, 20266.5x their median

    تبكي هذه الأم لأنها وجدت إبنها شهيداً مقتولاً على الطريق ولم تستطع أخذ جثته معها بسبب الدبابات والرصاص مشاهد تقشعر لها الأبدان، هذا ظلم كبير .. يُعدم الأبرياء في الشوارع !! https://t.co/0AsZt1Kz3a

    14K8.0K419168526K viewsView on X
  • Jun 30, 20174.3x their median

    للناس الفاضيه اللي مش وراها حاجه .. الناس اللي مهتمه بـ لا شيئ .. مستنيكم على سناب شات 😂😂 e: joehussen https://t.co/aYyfU762Kt https://t.co/Z6EP7pJP00

    14K3872.0K73View on X
  • Jul 19, 2026

    اللهم ارحم عبدك فياض الكندي واغفر له واجعل في الفردوس الأعلى ، اللهم اجعل هذا الكلام شاهد له وشفيع له بعد موته https://t.co/ZcmCdV49nx

    4.0K5777814208K viewsView on X
  • Jul 7, 202621x their median

    شكراً منتخب مصر .. قدمتوا بطولة عظيمة .. .. وأداء كبيير للتاريخ .. كل الجمهور اللي مش عربي في الملعب بيسأل أي حد لابس تيشيرت منتخب مصر عن اسم حارس منتخبنا .. مصطفى شوبير .. كل الناس بتهنينا على اداء المنتخب .. شكراً حسام حسن ورجالته .. وهاردلك لك يا مصر 🥹🥹🇪🇬❤️🇪🇬❤️ #مصر_الارجنتين

    4.4K216574236K viewsView on X
  • Oct 22, 2026

    للإجابة على سؤال … هل ترسل مصر قواتها بجانب #السعودية في #اليمن ؟ https://t.co/1AOl56tkkB

    3.3K68529839250K viewsView on X
  • Oct 14, 2026

    يبدو أن "يحيى سريع" المتحدث العسكري باسم الحوثيين قد قتل بالفعل في غارة جوية على صنعاء، مما اضطر الحوثيين إلى استخدام الذكاء الصناعي بصورته لبث التقارير الجديدة، وهو ما يؤكد مقتله، وقد سألت محرك الذكاء الصناعي في تويتر "جروك" سؤالا محددا: هل فيديو المتحدث باسم الحوثيين هنا بالذكاء الصناعي أم حقيقي؟ فكانت إجابته ـ التي أنقلها بالحرف الواحد ـ كالتالي : يبدو أنه مُولَّد أو مُعدَّل بالذكاء الاصطناعي (وليس فيديو حقيقي لشخص يتحدث). يظهر شخصاً يشبه المتحدث العسكري باسم الحوثيين (يحيى سريع) بالزي العسكري والبيريه الأحمر، وهو يتحدث عن "أربع عمليات نوعية في العمق السعودي". أدلة تشير إلى أنه ذكاء اصطناعي: عدم الرمش: مدة الفيديو حوالي 3 دقائق (193 ثانية)، ويظهر في اللقطات المتتالية أن العينين مفتوحتان بشكل ثابت دون رمش واضح. البشر العاديون يرمشون عدة مرات في الدقيقة، وهذا من أشهر علامات فيديوهات الـdeepfake أو الـAI talking heads. حركة غير طبيعية في الملابس: التعليقات تشير إلى أن السترة/الجاكيت "تتنفس" (تتحرك بشكل غير طبيعي أو متموج)، وهو أمر شائع في نماذج توليد الفيديو بالذكاء الاصطناعي التي لا تحاكي فيزياء القماش بدقة. وضعية ثابتة جداً: الرأس والجسم يبقيان في وضع شبه ثابت طوال المقطع مع حركة الفم فقط، وهو نمط متكرر في الفيديوهات المولدة من صورة ثابتة أو نماذج مثل تلك المستخدمة في توليد المتحدثين. تعليقات ومقارنات متداولة: هناك منشورات تقارن بين هذا الفيديو وتصريحات سابقة، وتشير إلى اختلافات في حجم الأذن، غياب شامة تحت العين، ومشاكل في النظارات، بالإضافة إلى التأكيد على عدم الرمش. ملاحظات إضافية: الحوثيون متهمون سابقاً باستخدام الذكاء الاصطناعي (مثل استنساخ أصوات قادة يمنيين في عمليات تضليل، واستخدام أدوات مثل Claude لتطوير برمجيات أسلحة). شكل الشخص يشبه يحيى سريع الحقيقي في الصور والفيديوهات المعروفة، لكن العلامات الفنية في هذا المقطع تحديداً تدعم أنه ليس تسجيلاً مباشراً حقيقياً.

    2.6K406461341.4M viewsView on X
  • Jul 12, 202612x their median

    قطر تنعى سمو الأمير الوالد الشيخ حمد بن خليفة آل ثاني.. أبرز محطات مسيرة سمو الأمير الوالد وإرثه https://t.co/2PF3niDWiN

    2.2K336141342.3M viewsView on X
  • Jun 4, 202698x their median

    التويته دي هتكون عباره عن فيديوهات بتحبوها أو فيديوهات بتشوفوها غريبه أو مضحكه

    1.7K1309070957M viewsView on X
  • Jul 11, 20268.1x their median

    ياجماعة الطفل دا اسمه مصطفي ، في كابل كهربا ضرب فيه واتبهدل جامد اهله بعتولي عاوزين حد يدخلهم مستشفي اهل مصر يتحجز هناك فلو حد ليه أكسيس مع دكاترة او مسؤلين فيها ياريت يبعتلهم صور الولد والتقرير عشان الولد حالته صعبه واهله مش قد مصاريف الخاص شكرا وربنا يجازيكم كل خير https://t.co/Tmrnf4VjJu

    1.2K584161486K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#عاجل#اليمن#السعودية#الأزهر#العربي_اليوم

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 3.9K interactions against 2.1M followers, an engagement rate of 0.186%. Posts are seen about 814K times each, and 0.479% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 38.8% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 63% of days. Most posts go out around 07:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 2 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 27K interactions, about 6.8x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #عاجل, #اليمن, #السعودية. Only 2 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

What is Joe's engagement rate on X?
Joe (@youssef_hussen) has an engagement rate of 0.186%, based on the median interactions across 2 original posts from the last 30 days against 2,097,957 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.186%, Joe sits above the 50th percentile of the 212,270 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @youssef_hussen have real engagement?
There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
When does @youssef_hussen post?
Most posts go out around 07:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.57 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going