Back to @xxxleander's profile

Leander πŸ‰ engagement report

@xxxleander - 523K followers on X

Measured over 10 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 5, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.233%
of 523K followers
Per impression
3.75%
33K views on a typical post
Reach
6.23%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
1.2K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.573%
186 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.1/day
active 57% of days
Peak time
14:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 1.2K interactions against 523K followers, an engagement rate of 0.233%. Measured over 10 original posts, its engagement rate beats 81% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 33K times each, and 3.75% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 6.23% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 57% of days. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 10 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 80% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 4.1K interactions, about 3.4x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #ass, #fucking, #thatdanda.

Measured over 10 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 5, 2026. Recurring tags: #ass, #fucking, #thatdanda.

Compared with accounts its own size

Leander πŸ‰'s engagement rate beats 81% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 85% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.233%, Leander πŸ‰ sits above the 50th percentile of the 66,258 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.1% to 0.499%.

p100.002%
p250.016%
p50 (median)0.1%
p750.499%
p902.09%
p99119.6%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 66,258 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 56,968 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.016%
50th percentile0.1%
75th percentile0.499%
90th percentile2.09%
99th percentile119.6%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 14:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 90 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 17, 20263.4x their median

    Sexy rocket @KarlOsceola has a great smile and loads of energy πŸš€!! https://t.co/dVWxzx875i

    3.7K38111593K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 20262.5x their median

    Fuck me, grab my tits, kiss me. I’m not complicated πŸ˜‰ (with @KarlOsceola) https://t.co/xGjNmeFRUb

    2.8K26419265K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 20262.0x their median

    Mechanic daddy @EssexSpunk knows how to drive me πŸ›ž https://t.co/h6eDSxMPUn

    2.2K24310059K viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 2026

    Vers boys have all the (flip) fun 😈 with @seamusmxxx https://t.co/2kasTNL7WE

    1.4K1276129K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 2026

    Love when Aussie boys visit and bring the heat ❀️‍πŸ”₯ (with sexy @pharaohphag) https://t.co/C5ytpzlVuh

    1.2K10611040K viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 2026

    Come take a ride on my ginger dick (with @pharaohphag) https://t.co/8Ljgwgc57S

    1.0K9411232K viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 2026

    Chest day + Good lighting. Give β€˜em a squeeze? https://t.co/0afzBdC7vW

    9354219133K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 2026

    August was a very hot end to a very hot summer ❀️‍πŸ”₯! with @EssexSpunk @KarlOsceola @seamusmxxx and @pharaohphag https://t.co/JUYK36dNAZ

    836635125K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 2026

    Do you think they’d print an extra β€˜N’ in the logo for me? πŸ€” @LeaderMenswear https://t.co/CKWuuXKp8i

    8164520028K viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 2026

    Flip fun is fun! πŸ˜† Especially with @seamusmxxx https://t.co/z227fJGJG6

    669633013K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#ass#fucking#thatdanda#xxxleander

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 1.2K interactions against 523K followers, an engagement rate of 0.233%. Measured over 10 original posts, its engagement rate beats 81% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 33K times each, and 3.75% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 6.23% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 57% of days. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 10 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 80% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 4.1K interactions, about 3.4x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #ass, #fucking, #thatdanda.

What is Leander πŸ‰'s engagement rate on X?
Leander πŸ‰ (@xxxleander) has an engagement rate of 0.233%, based on the median interactions across 10 original posts from the last 30 days against 522,688 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.233%, Leander πŸ‰ sits above the 50th percentile of the 66,258 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @xxxleander have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 81% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @xxxleander post?
Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.1 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going