Back to @xpocketapp's profile

XPocket engagement report

@xpocketapp - 552K followers on X

Measured over 17 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 12, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom quarter for its size
Per follower
0.001%
of 552K followers
Per impression
0.065%
9.2K views on a typical post
Reach
1.65%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
6
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.2/day
active 63% of days
Peak time
10:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 6 interactions against 552K followers, an engagement rate of 0.001%. Measured over 17 original posts, its engagement rate beats 12% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 9.2K times each, and 0.065% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.66% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.2 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 63% of days. Most posts go out around 10:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 17 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 100% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 162 interactions, about 14x its own typical post.

Measured over 17 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 12, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

XPocket's engagement rate beats 12% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 4% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.001%, XPocket sits below the 10th percentile of the 204,798 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,798 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,879 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 10:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 10:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 10:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 230 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • May 28, 202614x their median

    $GTA verified on XPocket βœ… +55% in the last 24H. TON really got GTA before Rockstar dropped GTA6. Trade before the lobby gets full πŸ‘‡ https://t.co/qSiYIdWZxT

    93422524.6K viewsView on X
  • Jul 10, 20266.4x their median

    $GRAMMING is verified on XPocket βœ… Turns out some people weren't just gramming. They were calling: πŸ’Ž 33.84x from $14K πŸ’Ž 24.01x from $19K πŸ’Ž 22.45x from $20K Track top callers. πŸ‘‡ https://t.co/YSgvIw2vDn

    433015116K viewsView on X
  • Jun 4, 20266.8x their median

    $道德碓 Verified on XPocket βœ… Lao Tzu wrote the Tao Te Ching 2,500 years ago. Nobody warned him it would become a memecoin with a $138K market cap. Trade it early. Earn 30% from every referral πŸ‘‡ https://t.co/EoV3EfOOxY

    53191522.3K viewsView on X
  • Jul 3, 20265.2x their median

    $KOTE Verified on XPocket The market said "meow." ⚞^. .^⚟ +71% in 24 hours. Explore more verified picks ⇣ https://t.co/t0dByEkwBA

    352215117K viewsView on X
  • Aug 5, 202610x their median

    $GROYP is verified on XPocket πŸ‘‘ An OG TON memecoin inspired by the iconic Groyper meme is now part of the verified list. Explore more tokens πŸ‘‡ https://t.co/nY6MSh4Z7Z

    40157012K viewsView on X
  • Aug 12, 20269.0x their median

    🌐XPocket & TOP Blast Partnership Starting today all memcoins reached listing via @topblastlol will be verified in XPocket Trade TOP Blast MemesπŸ‘‡ https://t.co/hfMVr0q6vt

    29159112K viewsView on X
  • Jun 3, 20264.3x their median

    $67 Verified on XPocket βœ… Up 2,614% in 24 hours and still only a $55K market cap. By the time everyone agrees it's bullish, you'll probably be 67. Trade it like you mean it πŸ‘‡ https://t.co/ymLtsZhNXq

    3711401.8K viewsView on X
  • Sep 14, 20268.3x their median

    solana:CbyTNf7UPzvewHh4Zp6umogM2RWahhmGRJWLJnPwpump up 312% in the last 24h 🚴 MC at $4.12M, liquidity sitting at $230K. The most unhinged crossover yet: Tyson's power, cyclist's legs. This chart hits harder than his uppercut ever did. Catch it on XPocket πŸ‘‡ https://t.co/yjONKuSWXt

    3775116K viewsView on X
  • Jul 9, 20263.6x their median

    $TONY Verified on XPocket βœ… Meet Tony. He's having a good day: ▫️+40.15% in 24H ▫️$86.2K market cap Discover verified gems πŸ‘‡ https://t.co/3wiYzmhjcZ

    28137214K viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 20265.2x their median

    solana:7Y7V1a4m2nWK7BMgbka5B4vR1pDvCK7yva3Hnrqkraze callers combined for 941.36x πŸ¦† Duck in swim goggles at the NASDAQ, MC already ran to $7.84M ATH before pulling back. Biggest calls on the token: 🟑 467.08x from $17K 🟑 462.80x from $18K 🟑 11.46x from $684K https://t.co/AzkEYltyG4

    18102112K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 6 interactions against 552K followers, an engagement rate of 0.001%. Measured over 17 original posts, its engagement rate beats 12% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 9.2K times each, and 0.065% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.66% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.2 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 63% of days. Most posts go out around 10:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 17 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 100% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 162 interactions, about 14x its own typical post.

What is XPocket's engagement rate on X?
XPocket (@xpocketapp) has an engagement rate of 0.001%, based on the median interactions across 17 original posts from the last 30 days against 552,439 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.001%, XPocket sits below the 10th percentile of the 204,798 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @xpocketapp have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 12% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @xpocketapp post?
Most posts go out around 10:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.2 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going