Back to @xluvmypedrox's profile

dzban engagement report

@xluvmypedrox - 74K followers on X

Measured over 18 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 24, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.035%
of 74K followers
Per impression
1.07%
2.4K views on a typical post
Reach
3.22%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
26
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.13/day
active 20% of days
Peak time
16:00 UTC
Thursday

A typical post picks up 26 interactions against 74K followers, an engagement rate of 0.035%. Measured over 18 original posts, its engagement rate beats 31% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 2.4K times each, and 1.07% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.22% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 20% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 18 posts sampled, 28% carry an image or video, 11% are part of a thread and 6% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 47K interactions, about 1789x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #gifzsoniciem, #notmysexiestmanalive, #rivals.

Measured over 18 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 24, 2026. Recurring tags: #gifzsoniciem, #notmysexiestmanalive, #rivals.

Compared with accounts its own size

dzban's engagement rate beats 31% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 6 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 41% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.035%, dzban sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,582 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.679%
p902.56%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,582 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,893 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.679%
90th percentile2.56%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 16:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video28% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link6% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 28% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 6% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 86 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Oct 21, 20261789x their median

    i feel like nicole https://t.co/Xc3YwBXbs5

    43K2.9K94163725K viewsView on X
  • Sep 12, 2026539x their median

    Lady Gaga and Michael Polansky spotted with newborn baby for first time since surprise announcement https://t.co/Ksqfl5V8Np https://t.co/w2sUeUxYDc

    11K8963211.6K19M viewsView on X
  • Sep 10, 2025366x their median

    Charlie Kirk nie żyje. Znany amerykański konserwatywny działacz i sojusznik Donalda Trumpa nie przeżył zamachu. Miał 31 lat.

    11K291306162826K viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 2026389x their median

    DC remains peak when it's on HBO. https://t.co/nKdp93tOs7

    9.2K66812392289K viewsView on X
  • Nov 1, 2025295x their median

    TOP DILFS OF THE YEAR 38 • Shawn Hatosy https://t.co/BDfXgJCv5u

    7.6K87158646696K viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 2026311x their median

    kocham polske bo jest 01:27, cisza i spokoj, deszczyk popaduje na ulicach i nagle rozlega sie KURWAAAAAAAAA ulice dalej

    7.8K2297988K viewsView on X
  • Sep 8, 2026255x their median

    Vinted is currently down. https://t.co/LcbHq8eedF

    5.9K102158481836K viewsView on X
  • Oct 19, 2026107x their median

    BREAKING: Actor Noah Wyle emerges as the clear favorite to be People's 2026 Sexiest Man Alive, edging Clavicular & more. 79% chance. 🔗 https://t.co/Do08OtaZ3Q https://t.co/rWLpIMNKsN

    942382421.6K1.5M viewsView on X
  • Jul 7, 202065x their median

    fuck video

    1.8K1047042View on X
  • Sep 8, 202628x their median

    Moja jedna ze współlokatorek tam pracowała i nie było dnia żeby nie usłyszały takiego tekstu fr obrzydliwe https://t.co/1C04S7YwKv

    69391812809K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#gifzsoniciem#notmysexiestmanalive#rivals

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 26 interactions against 74K followers, an engagement rate of 0.035%. Measured over 18 original posts, its engagement rate beats 31% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 2.4K times each, and 1.07% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.22% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 20% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 18 posts sampled, 28% carry an image or video, 11% are part of a thread and 6% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 47K interactions, about 1789x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #gifzsoniciem, #notmysexiestmanalive, #rivals.

What is dzban's engagement rate on X?
dzban (@xluvmypedrox) has an engagement rate of 0.035%, based on the median interactions across 18 original posts from the last 30 days against 74,014 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.035%, dzban sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,582 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @xluvmypedrox have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 31% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @xluvmypedrox post?
Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.13 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going