Back to @xiaoxiaojiujiu's profile

小久久 engagement report

@xiaoxiaojiujiu - 511K followers on X

Measured over 39 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 20, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.041%
of 511K followers
Per impression
0.199%
104K views on a typical post
Reach
20.4%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
207
interactions (median)
Saved
0.008%
8 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.4/day
active 83% of days
Peak time
15:00 UTC
Sunday

A typical post picks up 207 interactions against 511K followers, an engagement rate of 0.041%. Measured over 39 original posts, its engagement rate beats 55% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 104K times each, and 0.199% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 20.4% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.4 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 39 posts sampled, 33% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 18K interactions, about 89x its own typical post.

Measured over 39 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 20, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

小久久's engagement rate beats 55% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 14% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.041%, 小久久 sits above the 25th percentile of the 213,098 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.025% to 0.147%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.147%
p750.698%
p902.61%
p9982.9%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 213,098 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,393 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.147%
75th percentile0.698%
90th percentile2.61%
99th percentile82.9%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 15:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 15:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 15:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video33% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--8%-9% to -7%41K
  • 33% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 64 characters, which falls in the under 80 characters band. Across the catalog, posts under 80 characters run 8% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Oct 11, 202689x their median

    我恨死这些人了 这么好的一个女孩子 我好想哭…… https://t.co/z1UBdJOetv

    17K3281.4K293.6M viewsView on X
  • Oct 8, 202654x their median

    早上被电话叫醒,说我的号码涉嫌翻墙,让我去配合调查。去了之后要翻看我的手机,我说这是我的隐私,你们为什么要看?结果对面来了一句:你有什么隐私????….wtf 这是碳基生物能说出的话???

    10K7281665.0M viewsView on X
  • Sep 14, 202650x their median

    我真的看不得那个被捅伤眼睛的奶奶坐在地上一直哭…周边的人也没有帮她 看的人心好痛……

    9.3K110846161.2M viewsView on X
  • Sep 14, 202633x their median

    我靠广州大学城这个事让我震惊的还有一点 就是那个阿姨(看穿着应该五十岁左右)坐在地上捂着眼睛仰头 流了那么多血 刀插着 就有一个女的领着她孩子站在跟前看 甚至有一个路过看见了 还领着小孩呢就开始凑近直接怼脸拍 我说现在都这么没人性了吗??

    5.7K8890620894K viewsView on X
  • Oct 4, 202630x their median

    大半夜在抖音刷到这个我真的忍不住哭呀……好痛心好难过,不知道说些什么做些什么才能让她更开心更好些 https://t.co/zaPARXVQAn

    5.7K6538210605K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 202629x their median

    我真的不明白一些女生真的不知道外卖员都是基本盘吗??为啥要跟外卖员聊天我的天呐 自我防范意识真的好低……

    4.9K351.1K11873K viewsView on X
  • Sep 11, 202627x their median

    上海 五天 可內 我吃药 https://t.co/bkz0o6xolT

    2.7K492.7K403.8M viewsView on X
  • Aug 6, 202623x their median

    我感觉时代就是在慢慢抛弃老人呀😔… 今天我和闺蜜一起去汉堡店吃东西解馋,一个单人套餐团购上只需要9.9就能拿下 我们在角落里吃得正香,一个老人带着他的孙女来买东西,他们在菜单上点了一个汉堡和奶茶就花了快30 我不明白为什么不能线下也是团购价,明明大部分团购价才是正常的物价,他们在那里等了有一会才拿到食物离开 我心里其实很难受的,如果下一次再遇到这种情况我一定要上前告诉他们手机上也可以点餐😮‍💨😮‍

    3.8K388987762K viewsView on X
  • Sep 6, 202621x their median

    估计这个大哥下一次再也不会来这家店了…… https://t.co/EKCiImHOsi

    3.0K971.4K11.6M viewsView on X
  • Aug 8, 202617x their median

    我去 你们千万不要去看那个直播,真的很吓人后面都紫了,通宵到现在看完睡不着觉了 好想吐……

    1.3K122.2K22.1M viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 207 interactions against 511K followers, an engagement rate of 0.041%. Measured over 39 original posts, its engagement rate beats 55% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 104K times each, and 0.199% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 20.4% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.4 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 39 posts sampled, 33% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 18K interactions, about 89x its own typical post.

What is 小久久's engagement rate on X?
小久久 (@xiaoxiaojiujiu) has an engagement rate of 0.041%, based on the median interactions across 39 original posts from the last 30 days against 511,122 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.041%, 小久久 sits above the 25th percentile of the 213,098 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @xiaoxiaojiujiu have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 55% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @xiaoxiaojiujiu post?
Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.4 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going