Back to @xiajingfa8's profile

证势交易 engagement report

@xiajingfa8 - 105K followers on X

Measured over 40 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 13, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.036%
of 105K followers
Per impression
0.329%
11K views on a typical post
Reach
10.8%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
38
interactions (median)
Saved
0.018%
2 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.33/day
active 50% of days
Peak time
11:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 38 interactions against 105K followers, an engagement rate of 0.036%. Measured over 40 original posts, its engagement rate beats 34% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 11K times each, and 0.329% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 10.8% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 50% of days. Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 40 posts sampled, 55% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 690 interactions, about 18x its own typical post.

Measured over 40 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 13, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

证势交易's engagement rate beats 34% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 17% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.036%, 证势交易 sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,798 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,798 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,879 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 11:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 11:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 11:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video55% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--8%-9% to -7%41K
  • 55% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 54 characters, which falls in the under 80 characters band. Across the catalog, posts under 80 characters run 8% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Oct 30, 202318x their median

    整个中文推特,在及时分享策略下,证势交易应该是没有马后炮,最真实,准确率最高,盈亏比最大,如此辉煌成绩整个推特没有之一,你认为整个推特除了证势交易还有谁?评论区说出你们心中在最靠谱最真实最有实力的交易团队,一起挖掘最真实的交易团队,点赞+转发+评论,抽5名最真实的铁粉,中奖者可以免费进证势交易价值1999/3个月的VIP策略群,带你感受更精准的策略(二)#证势交易

    38488202161.1M viewsView on X
  • Oct 9, 20264.3x their median

    一代更比一代强😂 https://t.co/PJhsK0mV7R

    134199326K viewsView on X
  • Sep 21, 20264.1x their median

    8月上海黄金交易所黄金成交6707.3吨 同比增加66.9%

    171139014K viewsView on X
  • Oct 8, 20263.9x their median

    为什么都在跌,到底发生了啥

    821622125K viewsView on X
  • Oct 9, 20263.6x their median

    黄金现在不是讨论它跌不跌的问题,而是它怎么才跌这么点。30年期美债收益率都到5.73%以上了,黄金还在4200美元左右晃,这说明下面支撑很强,买盘很强,或者说市场根本没在按老逻辑走,这个信号很重要‼️

    109425031K viewsView on X
  • Sep 21, 20263.2x their median

    信用货币一定会崩塌,2030年之前黄金一定能突破10000$,立贴为证

    74839127K viewsView on X
  • Sep 24, 20263.1x their median

    黄金和美元正在慢慢脱钩。9月17日美联储宣布加息时,美元指数在98附近,目前已涨到101;而黄金当时在4300附近,现在仍在4300上下。相比之下,黄金几乎没什么波动,美元涨了这么多,黄金却没怎么跌,说明两者之间的联动性在减弱。

    58160021K viewsView on X
  • Oct 13, 20262.9x their median

    A股不是人玩的,远离A股,人人有责

    81027116K viewsView on X
  • Sep 24, 20262.8x their median

    这个市场到底谁在赚钱 https://t.co/JmxQd0H4jZ

    43064031K viewsView on X
  • Sep 29, 20262.7x their median

    截至9月28日,全球最大黄金上市交易基金(ETF)SPDRGoldTrust黄金持仓量为1058.83吨,较前一交易日增加4.28吨,幅度为0.41%,别人一天买4.28吨黄金都不怕,你买1000u害怕,4.28吨黄金等于 4,280,000克,按照今日(2026年9月29日)国内黄金原料价格(上海黄金交易所 AU9999)894.49元/克计算,4.28吨黄金约等于:3,828,417,200元(约 38.28亿元)

    16284010K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 38 interactions against 105K followers, an engagement rate of 0.036%. Measured over 40 original posts, its engagement rate beats 34% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 11K times each, and 0.329% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 10.8% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 50% of days. Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 40 posts sampled, 55% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 690 interactions, about 18x its own typical post.

What is 证势交易's engagement rate on X?
证势交易 (@xiajingfa8) has an engagement rate of 0.036%, based on the median interactions across 40 original posts from the last 30 days against 105,291 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.036%, 证势交易 sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,798 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @xiajingfa8 have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 34% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @xiajingfa8 post?
Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.33 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going