b engagement report
@wwxwashere - 94K followers on X
Measured over 66 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 18, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 1.7K interactions against 94K followers, an engagement rate of 1.82%. Measured over 66 original posts, its engagement rate beats 94% of 20,183 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 32K times each, and 5.31% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 34.4% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 50% of days. Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 66 posts sampled, 56% carry an image or video and 15% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 406K interactions, about 142x its own typical post.
Measured over 66 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 18, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
b's engagement rate beats 94% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,183 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 87% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 1.82%, b sits above the 75th percentile of the 202,076 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 25% band, which runs 0.672% to 2.54%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.142% |
| 75th percentile | 0.672% |
| 90th percentile | 2.54% |
| 99th percentile | 82.5% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 01:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 56% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 3% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | -3% | -3% to -2% | 54K |
- 56% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 3% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 104 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Mar 28, 2025142x their median
i have two friends who are considering having sex with each other for fanfic research purposes and i can’t stop laughing because that’s exactly fanfic logic of how they would fall in love
- Sep 11, 202636x their median
internet friendships are so funny because i love my irls but i couldn’t imagine ever sending them an ao3 link that is essentially the equivalent of graphic porn and ever looking them in the eye again
- Jul 30, 202632x their median
when i open twitter instead of ao3 at bedtime: https://t.co/qI23Ft2fls
- Aug 24, 202623x their median
Be honest People who don't drink and smoke, how do you manage stress?
- Sep 14, 202620x their median
https://t.co/LX8IUpacS4
- Aug 23, 202618x their median
https://t.co/PwmrfSKT6M
- Sep 11, 202613x their median
when the chemistry is so good i can spend years reading fanfiction about the same two people falling in love in nearly identical scenarios
- Sep 12, 202612x their median
"real shippers don't need their ship to be canon" real shippers don't even need their characters to even know about each other's existence
- Aug 24, 202612x their median
https://t.co/rmKC2wpKJf
- Aug 21, 202611x their median
https://t.co/5y32t34v4q
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 1.7K interactions against 94K followers, an engagement rate of 1.82%. Measured over 66 original posts, its engagement rate beats 94% of 20,183 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 32K times each, and 5.31% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 34.4% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 50% of days. Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 66 posts sampled, 56% carry an image or video and 15% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 406K interactions, about 142x its own typical post.
- What is b's engagement rate on X?
- b (@wwxwashere) has an engagement rate of 1.82%, based on the median interactions across 66 original posts from the last 30 days against 93,571 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 1.82%, b sits above the 75th percentile of the 202,076 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @wwxwashere have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 94% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,183 accounts), which puts it in the top 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @wwxwashere post?
- Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 4 posts per day across the measured window.