Back to @wszewko's profile

Wojciech Szewko engagement report

@wszewko - 229K followers on X

Measured over 81 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 1, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.274%
of 229K followers
Per impression
1.59%
39K views on a typical post
Reach
17.2%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
627
interactions (median)
Saved
0.023%
9 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
3.7/day
active 60% of days
Peak time
20:00 UTC
Friday

A typical post picks up 627 interactions against 229K followers, an engagement rate of 0.274%. Measured over 81 original posts, its engagement rate beats 76% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 39K times each, and 1.59% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 17.2% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 60% of days. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 81 posts sampled, 23% carry an image or video and 20% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 8.7K interactions, about 14x its own typical post.

Measured over 81 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 1, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Wojciech Szewko's engagement rate beats 76% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 56% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.274%, Wojciech Szewko sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,261 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.143% to 0.678%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,261 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 20:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 20:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 20:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video23% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link20% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 23% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 20% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 306 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 27, 202614x their median

    Gaza. Tam wszędzie były tunele Hamasu zapewne https://t.co/ghqxL0KhUF

    7.8K61318124263K viewsView on X
  • Sep 25, 202612x their median

    The tide in is turning, and it is not stopping. One public message after another. Jewish New Yorkers are coming out and saying it plainly: Not in our name.
Zionism is not Judaism.
Netanyahu does not represent us. Today this message is live in Times Square. @NYCMayor @NYCMayorsOffice @ZohranKMamdani Source @authenttorahjew @TorahJudaism

    4.8K2.5K128121206K viewsView on X
  • Sep 25, 20266.6x their median

    Delegacje ok 80 krajów opuściły salę podczas przemówienia Netanyahu w ONZ

    3.9K127119495K viewsView on X
  • Sep 23, 20266.4x their median

    Reklama na X prowadząca do sfałszowanej strony Gazety Wyborczej opisującej zdarzenie miedzy Stanowskim i Braunem (fikcyjne) a następnie do strony wyłudzającej pieniadze, dane osobowe itd. Ze sfałszowanymi recenzjami pracowników banków itp. https://t.co/VeSPRzK2PG

    3.6K2751364121K viewsView on X
  • Sep 7, 20265.1x their median

    „Każde dziecko w Gazie wyrośnie pod tym samym wykształceniem, nie powinniśmy pozwalać im żyć i dorastać do 14 lub 15 lat. Trzeba zabić wszystkie dzieci w Gazie, to rzeczywistość”. Mosze Feiglin, przywódca partii Zehut, (zostanie posłem w Knesecie po aliansie ze Smotriczem)

    2.7K4117515100K viewsView on X
  • Sep 25, 20265.1x their median

    NYT potwierdza doniesienia, że ZEA ostrzegły Netanjahu, iż Hamas planuje duży atak na Izrael krótko przed 7 października; Bibi nie przekazał ostrzeżenia urzędnikom ds. bezpieczeństwa

    3.0K19726679K viewsView on X
  • Sep 22, 20264.3x their median

    Erdogan określił Strefę Gazy mianem „najbardziej nieludzkiego i haniebnego obozu koncentracyjnego naszych czasów”. „Mamy do czynienia z nastawieniem ludobójczym, któremu nigdy nie dość zabijania. Nikt, kto posiada choćby odrobinę człowieczeństwa, litości czy sumienia, nie może przymykać na to oczu” .

    2.5K18033352K viewsView on X
  • Sep 6, 20264.3x their median

    Ukraińskie media donoszą o nowym planie pokojowym Trumpa, przedstawionym przez Kushnera i Witkoffa: ( niepotw. ) • całkowite zawieszenie broni • wycofanie sił ukraińskich z Donbasu i części obwodu zaporoskiego z możliwością rozmieszczenia tam kontyngentu ONZ • status Ukrainy jako państwa niezaangażowanego i rezygnacja z członkostwa w NATO • referendum i wybory • zmiany w konstytucji • rezygnacja Kijowa z silowego zwrotu terytoriów, które miałyby znaleźć się pod kontrolą Rosji •: ograniczenia liczebności Sił Zbrojnych Ukrainy • porozumienia w kwestiach językowych • podpisanie pełnoprawnego traktatu pokojowego przez nowy rząd Ukrainy, a następnie jego ratyfikacja w ramach specjalnej procedury ONZ.

    2.2K13237931329K viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 20263.8x their median

    🇹🇭🇺🇸 U.S. sailors and Marines from the USS Abraham Lincoln are walking in Pattaya, Thailand, after 265 days stuck at sea. Months of 16 hour work days, 7 days a week, and now they are let loose in one of the most infamous red districts in the world. What could possibly go wrong 😂 Writers: Lucas, Daniel https://t.co/NHDt3e5iyG

    1.9K14623147625K viewsView on X
  • Sep 28, 20263.2x their median

    125 statków dziennie przed wojną versus 5 w sobotę i 0 w niedzielę to nadal nie jest otwarcie Ormuz

    1.9K4870478K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 627 interactions against 229K followers, an engagement rate of 0.274%. Measured over 81 original posts, its engagement rate beats 76% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 39K times each, and 1.59% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 17.2% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 60% of days. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 81 posts sampled, 23% carry an image or video and 20% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 8.7K interactions, about 14x its own typical post.

What is Wojciech Szewko's engagement rate on X?
Wojciech Szewko (@wszewko) has an engagement rate of 0.274%, based on the median interactions across 81 original posts from the last 30 days against 229,295 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.274%, Wojciech Szewko sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,261 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @wszewko have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 76% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @wszewko post?
Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 3.7 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going