Back to @wowftstb's profile

wowftstb engagement report

@wowftstb - 172K followers on X

Measured over 22 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 24, 2026.

Engagement

Top 10% for its size
Per follower
1.73%
of 172K followers
Per impression
2.25%
132K views on a typical post
Reach
77.0%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
3.0K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.792%
1.0K bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.3/day
active 53% of days
Peak time
14:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 3.0K interactions against 172K followers, an engagement rate of 1.73%. Measured over 22 original posts, its engagement rate beats 96% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 132K times each, and 2.25% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 77.0% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 53% of days. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 22 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 15K interactions, about 5.1x its own typical post.

Measured over 22 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 24, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

wowftstb's engagement rate beats 96% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 66% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 1.73%, wowftstb sits above the 75th percentile of the 204,880 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 25% band, which runs 0.678% to 2.55%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,880 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,891 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 14:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--8%-9% to -7%41K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 73 characters, which falls in the under 80 characters band. Across the catalog, posts under 80 characters run 8% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Oct 9, 20265.1x their median

    没开玩笑,这个著名的裸体黑壮熊表情包,原片找到了。封面显小了,其实下体很粗长上翘,乌黑发亮 https://t.co/CXhY9Iv64p

    13K1.8K016256K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 20264.4x their median

    大奶黑皮壮叔越玩越骚 (封面这位壮叔有8部合集,喜欢的点我头像,看主页签名) https://t.co/JUeJ4t79az

    11K1.9K011291K viewsView on X
  • Oct 14, 20263.7x their median

    压迫感满满、掌控做爱全程的成熟壮熊,太有诱惑力了吧 (这位纯1壮熊大叔有27部合集,喜欢的点我头像,看主页签名) https://t.co/1Igz5IGoOp

    9.6K1.4K015375K viewsView on X
  • Sep 7, 20262.6x their median

    好一个西装暴徒、光头壮汉!趁同事喝酒醉得迷迷糊糊的就把他干了,床上功夫异常凶猛 【这位光头壮猛男有33部合集(大部分片子里都是戴墨镜的)。喜欢的点我头像,看主页签名】 https://t.co/DZH3Q5iuuG

    6.5K1.2K011212K viewsView on X
  • Oct 5, 20262.5x their median

    壮帅熟男大叔睡梦中遭遇猥亵,他挣扎了10.69秒之后开始享受被轮。一本正经的脸配着骚气的表情动作,反差好大 (封面这位弯屌壮叔有4部合集,喜欢的点我头像,看主页签名) https://t.co/UXt39y6mMa

    6.5K92803234K viewsView on X
  • Oct 21, 20262.2x their median

    特别放得开的黑皮壮熊,什么都能玩,什么都能塞!呻吟声很骚气奔放,连身上的暴汗小水珠都格外性感 (这位蒙面黑皮壮熊受有7部合集,喜欢的点我头像,看主页签名) https://t.co/i7bgZcy22w

    5.6K88802136K viewsView on X
  • Oct 11, 20262.2x their median

    摔跤服壮熊的耐操特训。胃口有点大,两个猛男轮流上他也扛得住 https://t.co/CDnj9JwesF

    5.6K84005235K viewsView on X
  • Sep 11, 20262.1x their median

    大胸健身教练说只要报他的课,怎么玩他都行,没想到是真的 (封面这位大胸壮男有25部合集,喜欢的点我头像,看主页签名) https://t.co/25e7XTVZ4b

    5.2K97705197K viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 20262.0x their median

    怎样才能睡到这种阳光帅气会抖胸的壮熊运动员?! (这位壮熊有10部合集,喜欢的点我头像,看主页签名) https://t.co/xs848SpSNk

    5.2K80203209K viewsView on X
  • Oct 19, 20261.6x their median

    极品猛攻壮汉最高级别的宠爱就是用力抽插! (封面这位成熟壮汉有16部合集,喜欢的点我头像,看主页签名) https://t.co/UBwUxDCtAu

    4.3K47900191K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 3.0K interactions against 172K followers, an engagement rate of 1.73%. Measured over 22 original posts, its engagement rate beats 96% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 132K times each, and 2.25% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 77.0% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 53% of days. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 22 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 15K interactions, about 5.1x its own typical post.

What is wowftstb's engagement rate on X?
wowftstb (@wowftstb) has an engagement rate of 1.73%, based on the median interactions across 22 original posts from the last 30 days against 171,566 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 1.73%, wowftstb sits above the 75th percentile of the 204,880 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @wowftstb have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 96% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the top 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @wowftstb post?
Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.3 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going