Waqas engagement report
@worqas - 143K followers on X
Measured over 12 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 27, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 928 interactions against 143K followers, an engagement rate of 0.65%. Measured over 12 original posts, its engagement rate beats 85% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 34K times each, and 2.75% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 23.5% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 23% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 03:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 12 posts sampled, 42% carry an image or video and 17% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 3.0K interactions, about 3.2x its own typical post.
Measured over 12 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 27, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
Waqas's engagement rate beats 85% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 71% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.65%, Waqas sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,374 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.143% to 0.678%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.678% |
| 90th percentile | 2.55% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 03:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 42% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 17% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | +15% | +14% to +16% | 32K |
- 42% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 17% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 722 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Feb 19, 20263.2x their median
Pakistan’s Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif to Trump: You are truly the savior of South Asia. https://t.co/7wX2GKvyaL
- Sep 21, 20262.6x their median
A tale of two planes This morning I went on Flight Radar to check when the Airbus-319 (call sign "PAK2") that brought PM @CMShehbaz to Luton was scheduled to fly to New York. I was shocked to find that the plane had already returned to Pakistan on 18 September! I thought perhaps the PM, ever the man of the people, had decided to take a commercial flight to NY. Or perhaps he had headed back home to make sure that feminist icon and beloved niece Maryam Antoinette was not slacking in jailing every living female relative of Imran Khan. But just to make sure...I looked through Flight Radar to see if any unusual aircraft had left for New York from Luton earlier today. To my surprise I found that a new aircraft, call sign "PAK2", had left for JFK at 10.13 am today. I am sure there is a perfectly reasonable explanation for this. Perhaps the first aircraft had developed some fault but then how did it fly back to Pakistan the next day? More likely, the PM probably calculated that it would cost HIM (since "private visit" etc.) less to park the Airbus for two more days at Luton than have a new plane come all the way from Pakistan to ferry him across the Atlantic. Sir @TararAttaullah you have to admit Flight Radar is amazing;)
- Sep 24, 20262.5x their median
Sir @TararAttaullah just wanted to bring an important matter to your attention. Some of your party’s own people in London are going around saying that PM @CMShehbaz brought 5-6 family members on the PAF Airbus that flew him to London. That’s why (they are saying) he took the larger plane from Islamabad to London, then took a smaller one to New York. Now you know and I know that neither the PM nor any member of his family would ever misuse official resources. Could you please share the flight manifest to shut up these people “once and for all” (as your boss @MohsinnaqviC42 would say)? Thank you, sir.
- Sep 22, 20262.0x their median
Someone tell Snape that dawn also reported the same. https://t.co/AhzSUC8Gqp
- Sep 23, 20261.8x their median
Sir @TararAttaullah could you tell us if any other world leaders have squeezed in a trip to the UN in New York in between two “private visits” to London? Also, could you clarify if PM @CMShehbaz would again be using two aircraft for the return leg to Islamabad? One plane to bring him to London and another one to take him to Islamabad? Also, has he already paid for the “private visits” to London or would he pay for them on his return to Islamabad — asking on behalf of the last of the Antoinettes.
- Sep 24, 20261.7x their median
Dear Mr. Prime Minister, On behalf of all meme enthusiasts everywhere, I just wanted to wish you good luck for tomorrow’s speech at the UN and assure you that we would be rooting for you. Don’t be nervous. Don’t think about anyone comparing your speech with THAT speech in 2019. You are in New York, and he, his wife, his sisters are in jail. That’s all that matters. Besides, you cannot do worse than you did last time. So take a deep breath and relax. You have done everything you could have done to prepare for this. 1. You left Pakistan 10 days in advance to get away from it all. You switched off all the stupid distractions in your life – like the problems of delivering good governance, security, jobs to the 250 million ungrateful assholes who hate you and would never vote for you anyway. 2. You made sure to break your journey in London (for five days) to acclimate your body clock gradually to the 9-hour time difference between New York and Islamabad. Imagine if you had flown in directly from Islamabad a day before the speech. You would have been tired, cranky and not feeling your best. 3. You brought in a different plane from Pakistan to fly you to NY from London because...I have no idea, I'm sure you had your reasons. 4. You duly locked yourself up in a room with “Doctor” Shama Junejo in London and fed her Zingers as she fed you some insane ideas for your UN speech which you then dumped after your ADC called her/them “batshit crazy.” 5. You muted Mosharraf Zaidi on WhatsApp two weeks ago. 6. You practiced your hand gestures, finger wagging and fist pounding for hours in front of a mirror in London. 7. You spent two hours every day lifting (fondling?) two little round objects in each of your hands while thinking of the nice things you would say about Trump and your boss, the field marshal. Remember, Trump may be the most powerful man in the world (and may have called you “terrific”) but the field marshal has you by your two little round objects – never forget that. So take a deep breath and relax. You got this. All the preparation, all the revisions, all the compliments to the CDF you have worked in to your speech...all of that has been leading up to this one supreme moment of national embarrassment on the world stage. Don’t think about the people of Pakistan (that's never been a problem for you) or all the secondhand embarrassment they will feel. Just tell yourself: “the mofos didn’t vote for me anyway and I will be back home in London in a few hours.” Remember, no one would be watching your speech anyway, and Sir @TararAttaullah will get it boosted on YouTube and X, like he did last time. So all the best, Prime Minister @CMShehbaz. You got this!
- Sep 21, 2026
Lol. Imagine how useless @MIshaqDar50 feels! PM @CMShehbaz literally used TWO government planes to get to New York but Dar had to fly commercial! https://t.co/RF91LryytE
- Sep 25, 2026
⚡️ NEW from @DropSiteNews: Democratic Party Consultants Surround Troy Jackson with Pro-Israel Donors After two failed attempts to nominate a Maine candidate friendly to the party establishment, the consultant class is finding better success with its third approach, co-optation. By @nathanTbernard & @ryangrim https://t.co/7Om8AHde9v
- Sep 26, 2026
***Big Breaking*** PM @CMShehbaz has left New York for London. Sources say the PM is visiting London at the personal invitation of King Charles. Impressed by Pakistan’s success in patching things up between Iran and US, the King has asked the PM to mediate between William and Harry. The PM has assured the King that he will stay in London as long as it takes to get the job done, causing much relief in both Britain and Pakistan. Sir @TararAttaullah will be officially announcing the visit shortly. There are also unconfirmed reports that Pakistan’s ace negotiator @MohsinnaqviC42 is on standby for joining the mediation when the PM inevitably f***s it up.
- Sep 25, 2026
Anthropic signed an $11.6bn, seven-year deal for CPU capacity on Akamai’s distributed cloud infrastructure, with the potential to expand by another $9bn, taking the total opportunity to around $20bn. In layman’s terms Akamai is renting Anthropic a huge amount of computing capacity — not GPU chips used to train frontier models, but CPU-based cloud infrastructure spread across Akamai’s global network. The agreement is roughly six times larger than Anthropic’s May contract with Akamai and helps explain the renewed interest in CPU, edge and distributed cloud names after the Muse/Instinct-led agentic AI rally. It does come with heavy capital intensity, including around $5.5bn of capex tied to the deal and roughly $1.7bn of additional 2026 spend to secure key supply-chain components such as memory, but the read-through is clear: frontier model demand is spreading across the infrastructure stack, and Akamai is now being treated as a more credible AI-capacity beneficiary: GS
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 928 interactions against 143K followers, an engagement rate of 0.65%. Measured over 12 original posts, its engagement rate beats 85% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 34K times each, and 2.75% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 23.5% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 23% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 03:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 12 posts sampled, 42% carry an image or video and 17% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 3.0K interactions, about 3.2x its own typical post.
- What is Waqas's engagement rate on X?
- Waqas (@worqas) has an engagement rate of 0.65%, based on the median interactions across 12 original posts from the last 30 days against 143,315 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.65%, Waqas sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,374 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @worqas have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 85% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @worqas post?
- Most posts go out around 03:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.27 posts per day across the measured window.