Back to @worldoftanks's profile

World of Tanks engagement report

@worldoftanks - 186K followers on X

Measured over 35 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 17, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.042%
of 186K followers
Per impression
1.15%
6.8K views on a typical post
Reach
3.63%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
78
interactions (median)
Saved
0.044%
3 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.17/day
active 100% of days
Peak time
13:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 78 interactions against 186K followers, an engagement rate of 0.042%. Measured over 35 original posts, its engagement rate beats 42% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 6.8K times each, and 1.15% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.63% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.2 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 35 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 31% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 386 interactions, about 4.9x its own typical post.

Measured over 35 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 17, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

World of Tanks's engagement rate beats 42% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 48% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.042%, World of Tanks sits above the 25th percentile of the 157,233 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.022% to 0.128%.

p100.003%
p250.022%
p50 (median)0.128%
p750.604%
p902.32%
p9983.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 157,233 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 26,048 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.003%
25th percentile0.022%
50th percentile0.128%
75th percentile0.604%
90th percentile2.32%
99th percentile83.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 13:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link31% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 31% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 239 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 19, 20264.9x their median

    See it. Hear it. Feel the impact. Update 2.4 brings the biggest refresh to World of Tanks’ visual and sound effects since 2018! 🔥 https://t.co/brFjoB5WOY

    3372717522K viewsView on X
  • Sep 6, 20264.1x their median

    A piece of history is heading to the Supertest. 🔥 The Panzerjäger I mit 7.5 cm was photographed during the final battles for Berlin in 1945. Now it’s coming to WoT as a Tier III TD with 115 alpha, 115 mm pen, −12° gun depression, and 40 km/h top speed. Would you try it? https://t.co/cQYnr2Xu6o

    293159315K viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 20263.3x their median

    Huge congratulations to Dakillzor! 🏆 He’s the first Commander across all World of Tanks servers to secure the Fossa VM 68 from Operation Fossa in just 5 days! No easy ride, but skill and perseverance paid off. GG! https://t.co/h55CCrhBCg

    233919010K viewsView on X
  • Sep 12, 20262.3x their median

    Supertest! The Jagdpanzer 7 Pfanne is a Tier VII German sniper tank destroyer. It's the first Tier VII tank in WoT to feature the Siege mode used by Swedish tank destroyers, along with hydropneumatic suspension. The mode transforms this TD into a menacing long-range sharpshooter. https://t.co/NudEPdWqui

    153713611K viewsView on X
  • Aug 15, 20262.3x their median

    Commanders! Two vehicles are joining the Supertest! 🛠️ ⚙️ Christie M1921: Tier II US TD, with rapid fire, good penetration & gun depression, but poor mobility. ⚙️ Kruk: Tier IX Polish Heavy, with accurate gun & high penetration for methodical pushes. Which will you try first? 🔍 https://t.co/HM2pg0REHk

    1471411617K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 20262.1x their median

    The biggest update of 2026 is about to drop! Update 2.4 is absolutely packed with fresh features, so let's stay tuned for what's coming! What's new? • six Tier XI vehicles • German heavy line • improved matchmaking • audio and visual changes • and more! https://t.co/s4AOnj3Xj4

    119634310K viewsView on X
  • Aug 20, 20261.6x their median

    Update 2.4 gives every light tank a clearer role on the battlefield. Light tanks are now assigned to one of three roles: Scout, Support, or Versatile. ➡️ https://t.co/m81GggGeJc https://t.co/hylcRCND8e

    10612727.7K viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 20261.6x their median

    Let's take a closer look at the stunners! Meet the new German heavy tank line, from the formidable Tier XI Pz.Kpfw. Neu down to Tier VIII. United by the unique Shell Calibration System, these versatile vehicles combine armor, firepower, and mobility. https://t.co/gzOOyb8RWK

    99101318.3K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 20261.5x their median

    Huh, we are lost 🫥 Which one is the right sound? https://t.co/ui9HBmRpoL

    9771508.9K viewsView on X
  • Aug 13, 2026

    The solar eclipse was spectacular. Where did you watch the eclipse from? https://t.co/cvfpVnsG5r

    928906.8K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 78 interactions against 186K followers, an engagement rate of 0.042%. Measured over 35 original posts, its engagement rate beats 42% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 6.8K times each, and 1.15% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.63% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.2 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 35 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 31% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 386 interactions, about 4.9x its own typical post.

What is World of Tanks's engagement rate on X?
World of Tanks (@worldoftanks) has an engagement rate of 0.042%, based on the median interactions across 35 original posts from the last 30 days against 186,456 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.042%, World of Tanks sits above the 25th percentile of the 157,233 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @worldoftanks have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 42% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @worldoftanks post?
Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.17 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going