Back to @wongkim728's profile

王剑 Wong Kim engagement report

@wongkim728 - 471K followers on X

Measured over 48 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 25, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.012%
of 471K followers
Per impression
0.35%
16K views on a typical post
Reach
3.40%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
56
interactions (median)
Saved
0.025%
4 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.67/day
active 27% of days
Peak time
06:00 UTC
Thursday

A typical post picks up 56 interactions against 471K followers, an engagement rate of 0.012%. Measured over 48 original posts, its engagement rate beats 36% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 16K times each, and 0.35% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.40% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 06:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 48 posts sampled, 19% carry an image or video and 88% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 662 interactions, about 12x its own typical post.

Measured over 48 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 25, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

王剑 Wong Kim's engagement rate beats 36% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 24% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.012%, 王剑 Wong Kim sits above the 10th percentile of the 204,694 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.677%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,694 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,880 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.677%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 06:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 06:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 06:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video19% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link88% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 19% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 88% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 256 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Oct 23, 202612x their median

    乌克兰军用星链终于恢复正常速度了!川普亲自致电马斯克,要求解除限速!此前拒不承认、一问三不知的两个人,终于现形了。一个无德,一个无良! https://t.co/2Xth0BGd2G

    5664746329K viewsView on X
  • Aug 16, 202610x their median

    有些丧心病狂了。 https://t.co/Pev3fxj0um

    4721671369K viewsView on X
  • Oct 22, 20267.8x their median

    红军长征的三大谎言:名字、名义和距离! 明明是第五次反围剿失败后的仓皇撤退,却被包装成伟大的征程;明明是向西南、西部逃亡,寻求苏联援助,却被宣传成北上抗日。日本人在东北、华北,西北往西跑,抗的是哪门子日?所谓两万五千里长征,中央红军的实际行军距离也存在巨大争议。 中央红军出发时8.6万人,到达陕北只剩约8000人。如此惨重的损失,却被中共宣传成伟大胜利。 长征的胜利,是毛泽东一个人的胜利! 今天习近平又要搞“新长征”,历史何其相似!习近平的新长征又是为了谁的胜利? 点击视频,揭开红军长征的三大谎言! https://t.co/RPKYNH8IeR

    3803916035K viewsView on X
  • Oct 20, 20266.6x their median

    太太生日,中午出去吃饭庆祝。 庆生的餐厅叫Capital,是一家牛扒店,去年太太生日我们也在这里吃饭,当时小姨子还专门过来祝贺。 我们上一个住所的附近有一家Capital店,面积不太大。因为朋友先请客,我们知道了这家餐厅。 后来我们喜欢上了Capital对面的一家店叫Season 52,这家店主打海鲜。 有一天太太告诉我,两家店是同一个老板,我们怎么吃都是他的生意。 后来搬到现在的住所,附近有个mall,里面有家Capital正在装修。 没多久就开业了,我们成为最早的食客,直到现在这家店仍是我们最常去的西餐厅。 餐厅服务生知道我们庆生,专门在餐桌上布置的生日的装饰,餐后还送了小蛋糕和小香槟。服务生进进出出都会祝贺一声,非常暖心。 我们边吃边聊,抚今追昔,畅谈人生理想,落脚处依旧是自家女儿。 一晃眼来美国七八年,搬家几回,女儿就长大了。

    340028130K viewsView on X
  • Oct 21, 20265.7x their median

    又见跨境镇压! 台湾相声演员黄逸豪因为公开讽刺习近平,竟然遭人买凶制造车祸。新北地检署10月21日起诉五名嫌犯。检方查出,一名代号“K”的中国人士涉嫌出资45万新台币,指使人员跟踪黄逸豪、安装GPS定位器,企图开车撞断他的手脚,阻止他登台演出。9月11日,黄逸豪遭蓄意冲撞,幸好仅受挫伤。境外金主还嫌他伤得太轻,拒绝支付20万元尾款。

    2713014428K viewsView on X
  • Aug 13, 20264.9x their median

    有人评价朱镕基:他改变了中国。 网友留言:他改回来了。 后面的他是谁?

    831191135K viewsView on X
  • Oct 20, 20264.3x their median

    看看这两组数据,中国学生赴美留学正在大幅萎缩。 数据显示,中国赴美本科留学生人数从2019年的14.9万人降至2025年的7.9万人,下降47.2%;赴美高中留学生人数从2018年的近4万人降至2026年的约8,200人,下降近80%。 数据来源:美国国际教育协会(IIE)Open Doors报告、美国国土安全部SEVIS统计。 为什么中国学生不来美国了?主要有三个原因: 第一,没钱了。赴美留学一年学费、生活费、交通费加起来,八万美元打底。中国经济下行,越来越多的家庭负担不起。 第二,钱出不来。中国的外汇管制,让家庭支付高额海外留学费用越来越困难。 第三,美国移民政策收紧。毕业后找工作难,申请H-1B工作签证难,拿绿卡更难。花几十万甚至上百万美元留学,最后却可能不得不回国,未来充满不确定性。 没钱、钱出不来、毕业后留不下来。这三重压力,正在改变中国家庭的留学选择。 中国赴美留学大潮退去https://t.co/qWJt04Vo97

    1753826139K viewsView on X
  • Oct 20, 20263.2x their median

    中共如何把老百姓的衣食住行,变成控制整个社会的工具? 因为它找到了一种更隐蔽的统治手段:胁迫施政。 你不交社保,孩子上学可能受限制;你不符合政府要求,租房、买房、落户就可能处处碰壁。 他在你生活的每一个路口设置障碍。最后你会发现,想要正常生活,就只能按照它的要求去做。 这就是胁迫施政最可怕的地方:把老百姓赖以生存的基本条件,变成迫使他们服从的工具。 从计划生育到疫情封控,再到今天的社保风暴,中共的控制手段究竟发生了什么变化? 为什么这种看似温和的软暴力,反而可能积累更大的社会危机? 🎯 最新深度评论,揭开中共“胁迫施政”的画皮👇 https://t.co/0OJ446euud

    154186122K viewsView on X
  • Oct 21, 20262.8x their median

    华为冥界! https://t.co/M8GVWH4EiX

    137811015K viewsView on X
  • Oct 20, 20262.7x their median

    台北市长选举爆出惊人民调!沈伯洋领先蒋万安17个百分点! 台湾信民协会10月20日公布最新民调,沈伯洋支持度50.3%,蒋万安33.3%,差距达到17个百分点! 9月同一机构的调查,蒋万安还以41.7%对40.5%微幅领先。不到一个月,双方支持度出现大幅变化。 但这份民调也有争议认为:泛绿样本占42.2%,泛蓝仅26.6%,而且没有按照政党倾向加权。 更有意思的是,虽然沈伯洋支持度大幅领先,但在谁会当选的问题上,蒋万安仍以39.5%对37.7%略高于沈伯洋。 这究竟反映台北选情出现重大变化,还是民调抽样结构造成的差异? 距离投票只剩一个多月,台北市长选举越来越值得关注。

    99644216K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 56 interactions against 471K followers, an engagement rate of 0.012%. Measured over 48 original posts, its engagement rate beats 36% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 16K times each, and 0.35% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.40% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 06:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 48 posts sampled, 19% carry an image or video and 88% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 662 interactions, about 12x its own typical post.

What is 王剑 Wong Kim's engagement rate on X?
王剑 Wong Kim (@wongkim728) has an engagement rate of 0.012%, based on the median interactions across 48 original posts from the last 30 days against 471,251 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.012%, 王剑 Wong Kim sits above the 10th percentile of the 204,694 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @wongkim728 have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 36% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @wongkim728 post?
Most posts go out around 06:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.67 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going