Back to @wolfejosh's profile

Josh Wolfe engagement report

@wolfejosh - 275K followers on X

Measured over 9 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 7, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.525%
of 275K followers
Per impression
1.33%
108K views on a typical post
Reach
39.5%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
1.4K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.114%
124 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.63/day
active 13% of days
Peak time
16:00 UTC
Saturday

A typical post picks up 1.4K interactions against 275K followers, an engagement rate of 0.525%. Measured over 9 original posts, its engagement rate beats 88% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 108K times each, and 1.33% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 39.5% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 13% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 9 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 22K interactions, about 15x its own typical post.

Measured over 9 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 7, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Josh Wolfe's engagement rate beats 88% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 54% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.525%, Josh Wolfe sits above the 75th percentile of the 66,128 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 25% band, which runs 0.499% to 2.09%.

p100.002%
p250.016%
p50 (median)0.1%
p750.499%
p902.09%
p99119.9%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 66,128 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 57,111 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.016%
50th percentile0.1%
75th percentile0.499%
90th percentile2.09%
99th percentile119.9%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 16:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Saturday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Saturday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 480 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 7, 202615x their median

    I used to think Zohran Mamdani was a ‘cultural Muslim’ who didn’t really care much about religion, and was just a third-worldist using his Islamic background for identity politics and votes. I was wrong. It is becoming increasingly more obvious by the day that he’s actually an extremely radicalized Shia Muslim practicing taqiyya all along. His father literally wrote a book justifying Islamic suicide bombings, and called America the source of Nazism and ‘settler-colonialism’ all over the world. That’s the environment he was brought up in, glorifying terrorism and hating America. Remember a couple months ago when relatives of Iranian regime officials were arrested in the US? They were all pretending to live secular lives, the women even wore provocative clothing. They were all practicing taqiyya. While all Islamic sects allow you to lie in order to advance Islam, this is even stronger in Shia Islam. You can live a completely different life. Well, I believe this is the same situation. Zohran Mamdani is not only a Muslim, he is a Twelver Shia Muslim. He belongs to the exact same sect as the Islamic regime in Iran, Hezbollah, and Houthis. His ‘progressive’ persona is all an act. The only thing he cares about is advancing Islam. This is why he pretends to care about the LGBT and other useful idiots. Taqiyya allows him to do that. Just like during the Islamic revolution in Iran, when the Muslims and leftists were allies, and we all know how that ended for the leftists when the Muslims got to power. I now fully believe he was groomed from a young age by his multimillionaire American-hating family to become a politician and help destroy America from within. This man is a monster.

    15K5.4K815311260K viewsView on X
  • Sep 5, 20263.8x their median

    Hasan Piker tells his followers suicide bombing is dead, buy Shahed drones instead. "Just make f**king drones. You can purchase them from online marketplaces. China literally sells explosive ordnance delivery mechanisms that you can put on a DJI drone. You can buy them at virtually no significant cost..."

    3.9K8403543391.9M viewsView on X
  • Sep 5, 20263.5x their median

    In New York, an imam urges Muslims not to be loyal to America, calling it an evil empire. "We can only be loyal to Islam. America is an evil empire that has killed millions of people. America is destroying the world." Sickening. https://t.co/320ZwcVCRr

    2.6K1.5K658250108K viewsView on X
  • Sep 6, 2026

    This is what Gaza looked like in October 6th. A paradise where Palestinians could chose to live in peace and prosperity. Instead, they chose to commit suicide. Destroying their own society by starting a war designed to be lost with heavy civilian casualties. The literal plan was to get as many of their own civilians killed, and especially children, as possible by placing military targets in civilian areas like schools and hospitals. This is a war crime. The reason Jordan and Egypt won’t let Palestinians into their countries is this exact kind of suicidal terrorism. Right of return is a fever dream and must be abandoned. Israelis should not have to live next to cultists that will kill them. Until Palestinians renounce violence, they have chosen their own fate - kept at distance from the people that want to live in peace.

    1.7K18914622162K viewsView on X
  • Sep 3, 2026

    If you've got school aged kids, this is one to watch. The UAE is one of the first countries to launch a K-12 AI curriculum. That means kids as young as 5 or 6 years old are now taking AI classes. I sat down with Education Minister @SarahAmiri1 to find out the vision for the program and what exactly it'll look like:

    1.0K3025066271K viewsView on X
  • Mar 28, 2026

    Nihi Sumba, Indonesia. 🇮🇩 🌊🏄‍♂️ https://t.co/s1ol5KOL7l

    56714511192K viewsView on X
  • Sep 5, 2026

    Solaris is an interface world model: an interactive, real-time video model that can create and render an interface for you. But most importantly, Solaris has this awe-like quality. Everything you do with it feels impossibly close to what computers should have always been. https://t.co/liQAZIQpmj

    1111011231K viewsView on X
  • Sep 5, 2026

    If we want American kids to care about science we need them to be able to gamble on it … Playing cards for researchers, unboxing on YouTube, one of ones, jersey cards, the whole shebang - gambling is the way. And they will know all the stats and care. https://t.co/KRBhGnB4zq

    100422629K viewsView on X
  • Sep 3, 2026

    Democratic Michigan Senate nominee Abdul El-Sayed is slated to appear on a panel at an Islamic convention in Detroit this weekend—six days before the 25th anniversary of 9/11—alongside two men who have promoted conspiracy theories about the terrorist attacks, @ChuckRossDC reports.

    602512617K viewsView on X
  • Sep 6, 2026

    Never again. 🇺🇸🙏 https://t.co/9rxXsPx0sB

    786409.8K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 1.4K interactions against 275K followers, an engagement rate of 0.525%. Measured over 9 original posts, its engagement rate beats 88% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 108K times each, and 1.33% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 39.5% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 13% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 9 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 22K interactions, about 15x its own typical post.

What is Josh Wolfe's engagement rate on X?
Josh Wolfe (@wolfejosh) has an engagement rate of 0.525%, based on the median interactions across 9 original posts from the last 30 days against 274,867 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.525%, Josh Wolfe sits above the 75th percentile of the 66,128 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @wolfejosh have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 88% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @wolfejosh post?
Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.63 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going