Back to @winwithwavey's profile

π•Žπ•’π•§π•–π•ͺ engagement report

@winwithwavey - 57K followers on X

Measured over 25 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 9, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
1.20%
of 57K followers
Per impression
1.40%
48K views on a typical post
Reach
86.0%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
669
interactions (median)
Saved
0.031%
15 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.03/day
active 27% of days
Peak time
03:00 UTC
Thursday

A typical post picks up 669 interactions against 57K followers, an engagement rate of 1.20%. Measured over 25 original posts, its engagement rate beats 87% of 20,445 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 48K times each, and 1.40% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 84.0% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 03:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 25 posts sampled, 48% carry an image or video and 12% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 5.5K interactions, about 8.2x its own typical post.

Measured over 25 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 9, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

π•Žπ•’π•§π•–π•ͺ's engagement rate beats 87% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,445 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 5 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 47% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 1.20%, π•Žπ•’π•§π•–π•ͺ sits above the 75th percentile of the 204,798 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 25% band, which runs 0.678% to 2.55%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,798 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,879 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 03:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 03:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 03:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video48% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 48% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 113 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Oct 2, 20258.2x their median

    49ers vs Rams SGP +18453 As long as Mac Jones does what he’s supposed to do, we’ll be at the bank before they close. https://t.co/REvKl59oOr

    4.7K195502524.0M viewsView on X
  • Oct 4, 20263.6x their median

    Lions vs Panthers SGP +3179 πŸ˜‘ I’m actually embarrassed to post a slip w/ odds this low. I hit straights bigger than this, respectfully. https://t.co/FE8d3c5MIP

    2.2K801774392K viewsView on X
  • Oct 8, 20263.0x their median

    Buccaneers vs Cowboys SGP +23885 Nothing really to say.. This just feels right! There will be a second variation posted in the cord by tomorrow. https://t.co/SmRbBQhUEx

    1.8K841443129K viewsView on X
  • Oct 8, 20262.9x their median

    Buccaneers vs Cowboys +23885 Nothing really to say.. This just feels right! There will be a second variation posted in the cord by tomorrow. https://t.co/0oBR562Vma

    1.6K902033108K viewsView on X
  • Oct 1, 20262.7x their median

    Steelers vs Browns SGP +15368 Bet protect one last time, for the freeski. There will be another variation for TNF inside the cord. You don’t need to join, but the option is there. https://t.co/WiGDfUtf9M

    1.6K829419515K viewsView on X
  • Oct 8, 20262.0x their median

    Waking up this morning was my first win, BANG. Thank you God for another day!

    1.2K11915747K viewsView on X
  • Oct 7, 20261.6x their median

    Good morning. If you’re seeing this = blessed. It’s been an amazing week 4, and I’m so ready for tomorrow. They really gave me another 100% boost.. πŸ€” B2B Thursdays? That’s the goal anyway.

    1.0K1521037K viewsView on X
  • Oct 2, 2026

    You know what’s so weird? Peep my pinned post. A year ago today, I hit my biggest slip for the timeline. Exactly a year later. To the date. We did it again. Thank you guys for always believing in me. πŸ’™πŸŒŠ

    9041975253K viewsView on X
  • Oct 7, 2026

    Don’t worry, I’m not putting Jalon Daniels on my TNF slip for rushing yards.. 🀣

    92111524106K viewsView on X
  • Oct 8, 2026

    Buccaneers vs Cowboys SGP +23885 Nothing really to say.. This just feels right! There will be a second variation posted in the cord by tomorrow. @playbook https://t.co/ctMg3hbFta

    563373814120K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 669 interactions against 57K followers, an engagement rate of 1.20%. Measured over 25 original posts, its engagement rate beats 87% of 20,445 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 48K times each, and 1.40% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 84.0% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 03:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 25 posts sampled, 48% carry an image or video and 12% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 5.5K interactions, about 8.2x its own typical post.

What is π•Žπ•’π•§π•–π•ͺ's engagement rate on X?
π•Žπ•’π•§π•–π•ͺ (@winwithwavey) has an engagement rate of 1.20%, based on the median interactions across 25 original posts from the last 30 days against 56,904 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 1.20%, π•Žπ•’π•§π•–π•ͺ sits above the 75th percentile of the 204,798 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @winwithwavey have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 87% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,445 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @winwithwavey post?
Most posts go out around 03:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.03 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going