πππ§ππͺ engagement report
@winwithwavey - 57K followers on X
Measured over 25 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 9, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 669 interactions against 57K followers, an engagement rate of 1.20%. Measured over 25 original posts, its engagement rate beats 87% of 20,445 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 48K times each, and 1.40% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 84.0% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 03:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 25 posts sampled, 48% carry an image or video and 12% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 5.5K interactions, about 8.2x its own typical post.
Measured over 25 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 9, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
πππ§ππͺ's engagement rate beats 87% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,445 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 5 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 47% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 1.20%, πππ§ππͺ sits above the 75th percentile of the 204,798 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 25% band, which runs 0.678% to 2.55%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.678% |
| 90th percentile | 2.55% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 03:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 48% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 0% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | -3% | -3% to -2% | 54K |
- 48% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 113 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Oct 2, 20258.2x their median
49ers vs Rams SGP +18453 As long as Mac Jones does what heβs supposed to do, weβll be at the bank before they close. https://t.co/REvKl59oOr
- Oct 4, 20263.6x their median
Lions vs Panthers SGP +3179 π Iβm actually embarrassed to post a slip w/ odds this low. I hit straights bigger than this, respectfully. https://t.co/FE8d3c5MIP
- Oct 8, 20263.0x their median
Buccaneers vs Cowboys SGP +23885 Nothing really to say.. This just feels right! There will be a second variation posted in the cord by tomorrow. https://t.co/SmRbBQhUEx
- Oct 8, 20262.9x their median
Buccaneers vs Cowboys +23885 Nothing really to say.. This just feels right! There will be a second variation posted in the cord by tomorrow. https://t.co/0oBR562Vma
- Oct 1, 20262.7x their median
Steelers vs Browns SGP +15368 Bet protect one last time, for the freeski. There will be another variation for TNF inside the cord. You donβt need to join, but the option is there. https://t.co/WiGDfUtf9M
- Oct 8, 20262.0x their median
Waking up this morning was my first win, BANG. Thank you God for another day!
- Oct 7, 20261.6x their median
Good morning. If youβre seeing this = blessed. Itβs been an amazing week 4, and Iβm so ready for tomorrow. They really gave me another 100% boost.. π€ B2B Thursdays? Thatβs the goal anyway.
- Oct 2, 2026
You know whatβs so weird? Peep my pinned post. A year ago today, I hit my biggest slip for the timeline. Exactly a year later. To the date. We did it again. Thank you guys for always believing in me. ππ
- Oct 7, 2026
Donβt worry, Iβm not putting Jalon Daniels on my TNF slip for rushing yards.. π€£
- Oct 8, 2026
Buccaneers vs Cowboys SGP +23885 Nothing really to say.. This just feels right! There will be a second variation posted in the cord by tomorrow. @playbook https://t.co/ctMg3hbFta
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 669 interactions against 57K followers, an engagement rate of 1.20%. Measured over 25 original posts, its engagement rate beats 87% of 20,445 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 48K times each, and 1.40% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 84.0% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 03:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 25 posts sampled, 48% carry an image or video and 12% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 5.5K interactions, about 8.2x its own typical post.
- What is πππ§ππͺ's engagement rate on X?
- πππ§ππͺ (@winwithwavey) has an engagement rate of 1.20%, based on the median interactions across 25 original posts from the last 30 days against 56,904 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 1.20%, πππ§ππͺ sits above the 75th percentile of the 204,798 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @winwithwavey have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 87% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,445 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @winwithwavey post?
- Most posts go out around 03:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.03 posts per day across the measured window.