Back to @wingoz's profile

trey wingo engagement report

@wingoz - 932K followers on X

Measured over 35 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 19, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.027%
of 932K followers
Per impression
0.96%
26K views on a typical post
Reach
2.78%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
249
interactions (median)
Saved
0.015%
4 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.8/day
active 13% of days
Peak time
22:00 UTC
Sunday

A typical post picks up 249 interactions against 932K followers, an engagement rate of 0.027%. Measured over 35 original posts, its engagement rate beats 48% of 21,397 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 26K times each, and 0.96% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.79% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 13% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 22:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 35 posts sampled, 46% carry an image or video and 6% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 65K interactions, about 1005x its own typical post.

Measured over 35 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 19, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

trey wingo's engagement rate beats 48% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,397 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 46% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.027%, trey wingo sits above the 25th percentile of the 214,101 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.025% to 0.147%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.147%
p750.7%
p902.62%
p9983.1%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 214,101 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,450 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.147%
75th percentile0.7%
90th percentile2.62%
99th percentile83.1%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 22:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 22:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 22:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video46% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link6% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 46% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 6% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 132 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Apr 15, 20231005x their median

    impossible for one guy to be more right while another is more wrong in a single video glorious https://t.co/upTVURljr0

    56K6.1K1.4K1.8K25M viewsView on X
  • Oct 18, 202688x their median

    JIM NANTZ JUST TRIED TO PEANUT PUNCH @JJWatt 🤣 "I did not think you were gonna go that hard" "my wrist is broken" 😭 https://t.co/ocdRBn282r

    21K7731331435.8M viewsView on X
  • Jun 10, 2026290x their median

    No agendas No hot takes No fluff Just a guy who knew ball & broke it down without the bullshit. https://t.co/wJ6aZ2Bj11

    17K1.1K3032193.6M viewsView on X
  • Sep 18, 202648x their median

    Trading away David Montgomery was the worst thing the Lions ever did. Gibbs is not a workhorse back. He benefits off of a workhorse back grinding the defense.

    11K3333201041.1M viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 202639x their median

    Seahawks extensions this offseason. 🏈Jaxon Smith-Njigba: 4-years, $168.6M 🏈Devon Witherspoon: 4-years, $132M 🏈Leonard Williams: 3-years, $90M 🏈Derick Hall: 3-years, $42M

    9.0K40783811.0M viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 202623x their median

    Chargers center Tyler Biadasz is out indefinitely after suffering damage to his ACL and additional injuries to his left knee during Tuesday’s joint practice against the 49ers, per @rapsheet and me. Biadasz will meet with more doctors to try to get more clarity. https://t.co/0cyNFBmUdY

    4.6K4303274172.1M viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 202622x their median

    NEWS: Injunction granted by Judge William Jorden, paving the way for NCAA and SEC eligibility for more than 40 atheltes. That group includes potential LSU transfers Dae’Quan Wright and Zxavian Harris, setting up a seismic decision for LSU whether they put them on the roster, which is due tomorrow.

    3.3K7066328132.8M viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 202622x their median

    A statement from Tony Romo https://t.co/CBIEaUaHOS

    4.7K18847972696K viewsView on X
  • Aug 20, 202621x their median

    #Bengals QB Joe Burrow says he's trying to manifest a Super Bowl this season: "I'm tired of saying next year, next year, next year. This is it. Life is too short to keep pushing things down the road." https://t.co/lxMEB3N3Ze

    4.5K2002692942.7M viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 202618x their median

    https://t.co/LE1j6B6edm

    4.1K2046951408K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 249 interactions against 932K followers, an engagement rate of 0.027%. Measured over 35 original posts, its engagement rate beats 48% of 21,397 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 26K times each, and 0.96% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.79% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 13% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 22:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 35 posts sampled, 46% carry an image or video and 6% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 65K interactions, about 1005x its own typical post.

What is trey wingo's engagement rate on X?
trey wingo (@wingoz) has an engagement rate of 0.027%, based on the median interactions across 35 original posts from the last 30 days against 931,820 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.027%, trey wingo sits above the 25th percentile of the 214,101 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @wingoz have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 48% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,397 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @wingoz post?
Most posts go out around 22:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.8 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going