Back to @wierdduk's profile

Wierd Duk ܦܝܪܬ ܕܘܟ engagement report

@wierdduk - 245K followers on X

Measured over 43 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 27, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.232%
of 245K followers
Per impression
1.28%
45K views on a typical post
Reach
18.2%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
568
interactions (median)
Saved
0.027%
12 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
5.1/day
active 23% of days
Peak time
19:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 568 interactions against 245K followers, an engagement rate of 0.232%. Measured over 43 original posts, its engagement rate beats 74% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 45K times each, and 1.28% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 18.2% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 5.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 23% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 43 posts sampled, 60% carry an image or video and 30% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 6.3K interactions, about 11x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #vandaaginside, #pauwendewit, #vk.

Measured over 43 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 27, 2026. Recurring tags: #vandaaginside, #pauwendewit, #vk.

Compared with accounts its own size

Wierd Duk ܦܝܪܬ ܕܘܟ's engagement rate beats 74% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 50% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.232%, Wierd Duk ܦܝܪܬ ܕܘܟ sits above the 50th percentile of the 204,491 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.143% to 0.677%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.677%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,491 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,891 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.677%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 19:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 19:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 19:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video60% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link30% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 60% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 30% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 254 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 26, 202611x their median

    Conflict. Extreme weather. Rising living costs. Millions of people are affected across the globe. Europe is stepping up to support them. Glad to announce more than $800 million for displaced people and their hosts across Africa. And aid for for war-stricken communities. As part of @GlblCtzn's 2026 campaign efforts ↓

    1.4K3084.2K360393K viewsView on X
  • Sep 7, 20268.7x their median

    Does Hanneke van der Werf (D66) call for a direct war with Russia? Does she realize the fatal consequences for the Netherlands? https://t.co/SBOubdj3Wd

    3.2K1.1K0661722K viewsView on X
  • Sep 24, 20265.6x their median

    1.8 million Syrian refugees have returned home since Dec 2024. But do you notice which countries and regions they’re returning from, and which they aren’t? Temporary asylum in the West is never temporary. https://t.co/iEyIUIQjxP

    2.7K3532438105K viewsView on X
  • Sep 7, 20265.0x their median

    »Winter und Amthor repräsentieren politische Senkrechtstarter, die in jungem Alter gelernt haben, dass im Politikbetrieb nicht belohnt wird, wer etwas Substanzielles sagt, sehr wohl aber der, der nichts Falsches sagt. Die kommunikative Verweigerungshaltung ist dabei die Kernkompetenz einer dahinsiechenden Politikergeneration christdemokratischer Prägung. Wer seine gesamte Laufbahn darauf gebaut hat, Angriffsflächen zu vermeiden, kommt damit glänzend durch – bis zu dem Tag, an dem eine Antwort verlangt wird. [...] Dieser in der Union omnipräsente Politikertypus ist Erbe der 16-jährigen Kanzlerschaft Angela Merkels (CDU). Merkel hatte es perfektioniert, viele Wörter zu verwenden, um nichts zu sagen; Fragen nicht zu beantworten, sondern zu umgehen, bis das Interesse an ihnen erlischt; und Politik als Verwaltung des Unvermeidlichen zu inszenieren. Sechzehn Jahre lang war das die erfolgreichste Technik der Republik, und eine ganze Generation ist damit sozialisiert worden. Nur: War die Nichtaussage eine Art Merkelscher Machttechnik in einem sediert-saturierten Land, dem es noch halbwegs gut ging, so hat sich die Technik bei ihren Nachfolgern längst erschöpft. Das Land ist heute ein anderes, die politischen Verschiebungen sind gewichtig, die Krisen entweder sichtbar oder bevorstehend. In dieser Gemengelage, in der die AfD längst stärkste Partei in Umfragen ist, stellt eine solche Kommunikation eine Bankrotterklärung dar. Sie ist zu einer unausstehlichen Manier geworden, die Politikverdrossenheit regelrecht kultiviert.« Habe für die @jungefreiheit, für die ich künftig als freier Autor zu Politik, Zeitgeschehen und Gesellschaft publizieren werde, über die gestrigen Auftritte von Wiebke Winter, Philipp Amthor und Franziska Hoppermann nachgedacht. Ich halte ihre Kommunikation für desaströs – und Symptom für ein größeres Problem, an dem sich inhaltliche Entkernung und ein unehrlicher Politiktypus zeigt. Jetzt lesen: https://t.co/TwEKRNkCjU

    2.4K369681757K viewsView on X
  • Sep 7, 20263.7x their median

    Bedankt, Hanneke van D66! "Europa dreigt meegesleept te worden in de uitputtingsoorlog tussen Rusland en Oekraïne. Je ziet Europese politici, regeringsleiders en top-functionarissen als NAVO-baas Mark Rutte dezelfde retoriek bezigen jegens Moskou. Kennelijk in een poging de publieke opinie voor te bereiden op verdere escalatie. Levensgevaarlijk!” https://t.co/RJlZGV0RN2 via @YouTube

    1.6K3631021238K viewsView on X
  • Sep 8, 20263.7x their median

    "Ik was zelf ook verrast over de grote winst van AfD", zegt een 'Duitsland-deskundige' bij Omroep Max. Oké ... #bubbels

    1.8K110127435K viewsView on X
  • Sep 26, 20263.5x their median

    De AIVD waarschuwt voor het normaliseren van extreemrechts door het gebruiken van het woord “remigratie”. En wat lees ik op de website van de rijksoverheid vandaag?? Vraag aan de dienst: normaliseerde de rijksoverheid het woord remigratie?🤡 https://t.co/uAP2O6FZsJ https://t.co/RfAsRsh6DX

    1.4K455713560K viewsView on X
  • Sep 27, 20263.1x their median

    Dit kan niet waar zijn! De veiligheid van Nederlanders moet voorop staan. Het is onbestaanbaar dat universiteiten mensen naar Nederland halen, die zeggen betrokken te zijn geweest bij de brute terreuraanval van 7 oktober. Met spoed uitzoeken. Klopt dit of steunt deze persoon Hamas? Dan visum intrekken en het land uit. En vooral: zorgen dat dit nooit meer kan gebeuren. https://t.co/D072ug7hRM

    7221478119684K viewsView on X
  • Sep 25, 20262.9x their median

    Ze nemen alles en iedereen de maat als het aankomt op vliegen, behalve zichzelf. Fractievertegenwoordiger @JA21Bas legt de hypocrisie van PRO-burgemeester #Halsema feilloos bloot. ✈️👇 https://t.co/FMfksrpOia

    1.2K23418534165K viewsView on X
  • Sep 27, 20262.9x their median

    "Gazaanse student (22) in Maastricht geschorst na filmpje over deelname aan Hamas-aanslagen in Israël: ’Dit ben ik’.": https://t.co/di3EWFNHU7

    1.1K2662633231K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#vandaaginside#pauwendewit#vk#albanese#asielzoekers

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 568 interactions against 245K followers, an engagement rate of 0.232%. Measured over 43 original posts, its engagement rate beats 74% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 45K times each, and 1.28% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 18.2% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 5.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 23% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 43 posts sampled, 60% carry an image or video and 30% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 6.3K interactions, about 11x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #vandaaginside, #pauwendewit, #vk.

What is Wierd Duk ܦܝܪܬ ܕܘܟ's engagement rate on X?
Wierd Duk ܦܝܪܬ ܕܘܟ (@wierdduk) has an engagement rate of 0.232%, based on the median interactions across 43 original posts from the last 30 days against 245,113 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.232%, Wierd Duk ܦܝܪܬ ܕܘܟ sits above the 50th percentile of the 204,491 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @wierdduk have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 74% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @wierdduk post?
Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 5.1 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going