Back to @wideworlds_'s profile

Wide Worlds engagement report

@wideworlds_ - 59K followers on X

Measured over 5 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 29, 2026.

Engagement

Per follower
0.003%
of 59K followers
Per impression
0.287%
696 views on a typical post
Reach
1.14%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
2
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.23/day
active 13% of days
Peak time
01:00 UTC
Thursday

Early reading. We have captured 5 original posts for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.

A typical post picks up 2 interactions against 59K followers, an engagement rate of 0.003%. Posts are seen about 696 times each, and 0.287% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.19% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.23 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 13% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 5 posts sampled, 80% carry an image or video and 20% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 107 interactions, about 54x its own typical post. Only 5 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

Measured over 5 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 29, 2026.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.003%, Wide Worlds sits below the 10th percentile of the 205,676 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.679%
p902.56%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,676 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,897 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.679%
90th percentile2.56%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 01:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 01:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 01:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video80% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link20% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 80% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 20% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 221 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jul 16, 202654x their median

    Not all demons are bad. Not all humans are good... Otherside is out now. We've partnered with Lion El Aton from FILM CRUX to bring his dream anime to life. Watch the full unrated version now on X: Who are you backing, the agents or the demons? 👇 https://t.co/UTDLqUAQDe

    7991458.2K viewsView on X
  • Jul 26, 20266.5x their median

    feeling sunday scaries? calm your nervous system by creating a ken carson edit 💕 https://t.co/OSAEAixILa

    100211.3K viewsView on X
  • Jul 23, 20265.5x their median

    Yesterday I watched for the first time Spirited away. All I have to say is that if you don't have a job you start to disappear💀 go and get a job guys asap🥲 https://t.co/VLn8PYUbMZ

    7031967 viewsView on X
  • May 22, 20265.5x their median

    Loading new creative tools for fans... ███████▒▒▒

    5312549 viewsView on X
  • Mar 18, 20265.5x their median

    We're joining our friends at @filmgatemiami this weekend (March 18–22) and it’s wild 🪼 Step inside stories with AI films, immersive art, and full-dome experiences. 🎥✨ Plus genJams and filmfests from our friends @MachineCinemaAI and @escapeaimedia 🎟 Details and tickets linked below. See you there!

    8111936 viewsView on X
  • Mar 17, 20265.5x their median

    Sneak peak: We’re rolling out a Fan Edits tool to a few customers for beta testing. Fan edits are insanely viral, but surprisingly hard for most fans to make. You have to find clips, download footage, cut videos, and assemble the edit. Basically the job of a digital archivist. We’re making it easy for every fan to create endless edits. And brands can now provide curated media libraries to their top fans and reward them for creating. DM for early access!

    72023.2K viewsView on X
  • Apr 7, 20264.5x their median

    New site, same obsession: Turning your most passionate fans into your most valuable creators. https://t.co/C6YRwNFfwJ

    6210752 viewsView on X
  • Aug 4, 20264.0x their median

    'crazy girls from hell' and chuck timely diehards, come through...we're building the street team to take Gracie and Role Model's new albums to the world. https://t.co/zhDAPrgrYj

    51111.2K viewsView on X
  • Jul 16, 20264.0x their median

    Fox just premiered Nation's Dumbest, the celebrity competition where losing is the whole point, ft JoJo Siwa, Hilaria Baldwin, Ice-T, Chase Hudson & More. We're building the crew to help spread every quiz, every fail, and every elimination across summer break. Six weeks, a small group of creators and fan editors, paid work, and exclusive access to footage and creator tools. Link to join below >>

    40221.2K viewsView on X
  • Jun 5, 20264.0x their median

    We're thrilled to be a part of the inagural @HallstoneVC portfolio. 🚀 https://t.co/AQuISUV9p8

    6002605 viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 2 interactions against 59K followers, an engagement rate of 0.003%. Posts are seen about 696 times each, and 0.287% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.19% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.23 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 13% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 5 posts sampled, 80% carry an image or video and 20% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 107 interactions, about 54x its own typical post. Only 5 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

What is Wide Worlds's engagement rate on X?
Wide Worlds (@wideworlds_) has an engagement rate of 0.003%, based on the median interactions across 5 original posts from the last 30 days against 58,558 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.003%, Wide Worlds sits below the 10th percentile of the 205,676 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @wideworlds_ have real engagement?
There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
When does @wideworlds_ post?
Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.23 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going