Back to @wideawake_media's profile

Wide Awake Media engagement report

@wideawake_media - 838K followers on X

Measured over 9 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 30, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.349%
of 838K followers
Per impression
6.70%
44K views on a typical post
Reach
5.21%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
2.9K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.27%
118 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.4/day
active 17% of days
Peak time
11:00 UTC
Saturday

A typical post picks up 2.9K interactions against 838K followers, an engagement rate of 0.349%. Measured over 9 original posts, its engagement rate beats 90% of 3,791 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 44K times each, and 6.70% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.21% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 17% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 9 posts sampled, 78% carry an image or video and 11% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 41K interactions, about 14x its own typical post.

Measured over 9 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 30, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Wide Awake Media's engagement rate beats 90% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,791 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 96% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.349%, Wide Awake Media sits above the 50th percentile of the 36,759 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.08% to 0.434%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.08%
p750.434%
p902.10%
p99160.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 36,759 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 106,964 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.08%
75th percentile0.434%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile160.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 11:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 11:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 11:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%51K
01:00 UTC-2%52K
02:00 UTC-3%50K
03:00 UTC-4%54K
04:00 UTC-6%43K
05:00 UTC-4%42K
06:00 UTC-4%48K
07:00 UTC-5%52K
08:00 UTC-4%61K
09:00 UTC-3%70K
10:00 UTC-2%72K
11:00 UTC-3%79K
12:00 UTC-2%87K
13:00 UTC-3%95K
14:00 UTC-4%98K
15:00 UTC-2%101K
16:00 UTC-4%99K
17:00 UTC-2%91K
18:00 UTC-1%85K
19:00 UTC-1%80K
20:00 UTC-1%75K
21:00 UTC-1%66K
22:00 UTC-2%58K
23:00 UTC-2%52K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Saturday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Saturday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+4%232K
Monday0%290K
Tuesday-2%281K
Wednesday-1%252K
Thursday-2%245K
Friday-3%254K
Saturday+3%228K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Aug 28, 202614x their median

    The United Nations REALLY wants you to forget that it invited Ghislaine Maxwell to speak as an "expert" on numerous occasions. https://t.co/99rLC50WYO

    31K9.7K281248446K viewsView on X
  • Jul 28, 20269.5x their median

    The Restore Britain approach on welfare is quite straightforward. No benefits for foreigners, end of story. If you're a healthy Brit sitting on Universal Credit, refusing to work? The message is simple - you will work, you will pick litter or you will lose your benefits.

    25K2.6K548103515K viewsView on X
  • Jul 25, 20264.3x their median

    "It shuts down the same day that Facebook is launched." Whitney Webb examines the striking overlap between Facebook and DARPA's abandoned LifeLog project, which sought to create a detailed surveillance record of a person’s entire life, including geolocation, personal relationships and photographs.

    9.3K3.0K12089224K viewsView on X
  • Jul 18, 20263.4x their median

    "What woke me up was that I got vaccine injured." Jimmy Dore recounts how suffering a Covid vaccine injury led him to question official Covid narratives and public health measures. "I was like, well, if they're lying about this, what else are they lying about? And it turns out... they were lying about everything."

    7.2K2.4K15388111K viewsView on X
  • Jul 23, 20262.4x their median

    NEW - Only 6% of people in the UK would volunteer to fight for the country in the face of an "imminent" invasion, according to polling from yougov — Sky

    5.4K519783321628K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 20262.4x their median

    Ex-marine Ken O'Keefe drops a barrage of truth bombs for 90 seconds straight. 🔥 "The whole system is based on financial fraud, which effectively takes the power that we have and it gives it to a tiny group of individuals who are running the world through... the infinite supply of money that we have allowed them to take." "And with that money... they have bought everything and everyone who can be bought." "If I was in charge of the world... you can bet damn sure that's what I would do." "I wouldn't allow anyone in a position of power who wasn't completely compromised."

    4.8K1.9K11484111K viewsView on X
  • Jul 20, 20262.0x their median

    Catherine Austin Fitts describes the Covid era as a "financial coup"—designed to transfer economic power to large corporations by deliberately bankrupting small businesses while large retailers were allowed to stay open. "What you do is you shut down the small businesses and small farms, you leave the publicly traded companies open... and then they're in a position to consolidate the market share of the small businesses and buy up assets cheap." "It's an incredible way to pick up market share because you don't have to buy it or compete for it. You just shut them down."

    3.9K1.7K8083174K viewsView on X
  • Jul 28, 20262.0x their median

    Neil Oliver describes world leaders as irrelevant puppets controlled by faceless elites operating behind the scenes. He argues that maintaining a permanent state of anxiety among the public—through higher taxes and engineered social conflict—is a deliberate tactic to facilitate manipulation, division and control.

    4.4K1.3K903865K viewsView on X
  • Jul 24, 20261.9x their median

    Geologist Ian Plimer demolishes the "climate science hysteria" underpinning Net Zero. "You cannot run an industrial economy on sea breezes and sunbeams... It's totally ridiculous." "Carbon dioxide is plant food... Without carbon dioxide you have no life on Earth." https://t.co/fAFmB3PoAy

    4.0K1.5K585157K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 20261.7x their median

    Neil Oliver calls out the "anti-human" Net Zero policies pushed by the "parasite class". "Smothering arable land with solar panels while simultaneously spending billions... on technologies to dim the sun—the same sun that powers the solar panels." "They cut down trees by the forest full so that they can make the wood into pellets to burn for power, and then spend more billions developing machines to capture carbon from the air, which is precisely what trees do if they're left to be trees." "We are made of carbon and yet they preach zero carbon." "Carbon dioxide is at low levels in the atmosphere already... If it had got much lower, life on Earth would have been impossible."

    3.5K1.5K665544K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 2.9K interactions against 838K followers, an engagement rate of 0.349%. Measured over 9 original posts, its engagement rate beats 90% of 3,791 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 44K times each, and 6.70% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.21% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 17% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 9 posts sampled, 78% carry an image or video and 11% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 41K interactions, about 14x its own typical post.

What is Wide Awake Media's engagement rate on X?
Wide Awake Media (@wideawake_media) has an engagement rate of 0.349%, based on the median interactions across 9 original posts from the last 30 days against 838,421 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.349%, Wide Awake Media sits above the 50th percentile of the 36,759 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @wideawake_media have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 90% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,791 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @wideawake_media post?
Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.4 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going