Back to @wideawake_media's profile

Wide Awake Media engagement report

@wideawake_media - 835K followers on X

Measured over 22 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 26, 2026.

Engagement

Top 10% for its size
Per follower
0.588%
of 835K followers
Per impression
8.01%
62K views on a typical post
Reach
7.35%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
4.9K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.225%
138 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.7/day
active 63% of days
Peak time
11:00 UTC
Sunday

A typical post picks up 4.9K interactions against 835K followers, an engagement rate of 0.588%. Measured over 22 original posts, its engagement rate beats 93% of 20,182 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 62K times each, and 8.01% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 7.37% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 63% of days. Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 22 posts sampled, 77% carry an image or video and 14% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 41K interactions, about 8.4x its own typical post.

Measured over 22 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 26, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Wide Awake Media's engagement rate beats 93% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,182 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 96% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.588%, Wide Awake Media sits above the 50th percentile of the 204,491 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.143% to 0.677%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.677%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,491 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,891 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.677%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 11:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 11:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 11:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video77% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link5% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 77% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 5% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 439 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 28, 20268.4x their median

    The United Nations REALLY wants you to forget that it invited Ghislaine Maxwell to speak as an "expert" on numerous occasions. https://t.co/99rLC50WYO

    31K9.7K280255467K viewsView on X
  • Jul 28, 20265.6x their median

    The Restore Britain approach on welfare is quite straightforward. No benefits for foreigners, end of story. If you're a healthy Brit sitting on Universal Credit, refusing to work? The message is simple - you will work, you will pick litter or you will lose your benefits.

    24K2.6K541103516K viewsView on X
  • Dec 18, 20254.4x their median

    I joined the British Army! https://t.co/HUlrx4Zjze

    16K1.8K2.6K7101.3M viewsView on X
  • Jul 25, 20262.5x their median

    "It shuts down the same day that Facebook is launched." Whitney Webb examines the striking overlap between Facebook and DARPA's abandoned LifeLog project, which sought to create a detailed surveillance record of a person’s entire life, including geolocation, personal relationships and photographs.

    9.2K3.0K12089225K viewsView on X
  • Jul 18, 20262.0x their median

    "What woke me up was that I got vaccine injured." Jimmy Dore recounts how suffering a Covid vaccine injury led him to question official Covid narratives and public health measures. "I was like, well, if they're lying about this, what else are they lying about? And it turns out... they were lying about everything."

    7.2K2.4K15388111K viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 20262.0x their median

    Anthropic is so worthless man. If I can't tell a model 'fuck you' (a normal thing to say when the $200/m thing refuses a low-risk task) then we are not even remotely fucking close to AGI. "wait but the model has feewings and does better if you say 'I believe in you'!" -- I'm talking to a fucking computer. You are pond scum.

    8.2K319957249753K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 20262.0x their median

    In one of his final messages to humanity, John McAfee exposed the people really calling the shots. "Is there a deep state? Yes. Can we fire these people? No. Can presidents fire them? No." "It's designed that way so that political parties and political interests cannot affect the deep state." "Do you understand the nightmare of our situation, people?" "Wake up people, please."

    7.2K2.3K8860128K viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 20261.6x their median

    Welcome to the UK, where 5-year-olds are old enough to choose their gender but 15-year-olds are too young to visit social media sites. 🤡 https://t.co/jnxYBoVWuN

    6.0K1.7K35286135K viewsView on X
  • Sep 24, 20261.5x their median

    https://t.co/28TqhkaIKl

    5.9K1.5K403642K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 2026

    Ex-marine Ken O'Keefe drops a barrage of truth bombs for 90 seconds straight. 🔥 "The whole system is based on financial fraud, which effectively takes the power that we have and it gives it to a tiny group of individuals who are running the world through... the infinite supply of money that we have allowed them to take." "And with that money... they have bought everything and everyone who can be bought." "If I was in charge of the world... you can bet damn sure that's what I would do." "I wouldn't allow anyone in a position of power who wasn't completely compromised."

    4.9K2.0K12184125K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 4.9K interactions against 835K followers, an engagement rate of 0.588%. Measured over 22 original posts, its engagement rate beats 93% of 20,182 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 62K times each, and 8.01% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 7.37% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 63% of days. Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 22 posts sampled, 77% carry an image or video and 14% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 41K interactions, about 8.4x its own typical post.

What is Wide Awake Media's engagement rate on X?
Wide Awake Media (@wideawake_media) has an engagement rate of 0.588%, based on the median interactions across 22 original posts from the last 30 days against 834,903 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.588%, Wide Awake Media sits above the 50th percentile of the 204,491 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @wideawake_media have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 93% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,182 accounts), which puts it in the top 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @wideawake_media post?
Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.7 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going