Back to @wholemars's profile

Whole Mars Catalog engagement report

@wholemars - 2.0M followers on X

Measured over 250 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 30, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.025%
of 2.0M followers
Per impression
0.803%
62K views on a typical post
Reach
3.05%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
498
interactions (median)
Saved
0.024%
15 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
20.3/day
active 53% of days
Peak time
18:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 498 interactions against 2.0M followers, an engagement rate of 0.025%. Measured over 250 original posts, its engagement rate beats 61% of 3,758 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 62K times each, and 0.803% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.03% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 20.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 53% of days. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 250 posts sampled, 66% carry an image or video, 6% are part of a thread and 11% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 141K interactions, about 282x its own typical post.

Measured over 250 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 30, 2026. Recurring tag: #gta.

Compared with accounts its own size

Whole Mars Catalog's engagement rate beats 61% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,758 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 50% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.025%, Whole Mars Catalog sits above the 25th percentile of the 36,378 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.012% to 0.08%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.08%
p750.432%
p902.10%
p99161.0%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 36,378 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 107,364 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.08%
75th percentile0.432%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile161.0%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 18:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 18:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 18:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%50K
01:00 UTC-2%51K
02:00 UTC-3%50K
03:00 UTC-4%53K
04:00 UTC-6%43K
05:00 UTC-4%42K
06:00 UTC-4%48K
07:00 UTC-5%52K
08:00 UTC-4%60K
09:00 UTC-3%69K
10:00 UTC-2%72K
11:00 UTC-3%78K
12:00 UTC-2%86K
13:00 UTC-2%94K
14:00 UTC-4%97K
15:00 UTC-2%100K
16:00 UTC-3%97K
17:00 UTC-2%90K
18:00 UTC-1%84K
19:00 UTC-2%79K
20:00 UTC-1%74K
21:00 UTC-1%66K
22:00 UTC-2%57K
23:00 UTC-2%51K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+4%230K
Monday0%286K
Tuesday-2%276K
Wednesday-1%251K
Thursday-1%244K
Friday-3%252K
Saturday+3%227K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Aug 18, 2026282x their median

    There is a potential future that is super amazing is we all fight hard to achieve it

    117K12K9.4K1.6K8.3M viewsView on X
  • Aug 20, 2026247x their median

    One day, Optimus + Grok will provide incredible medical care to all the people of Earth

    101K10K10K1.9K8.5M viewsView on X
  • Aug 18, 202699x their median

    This shit looks straight out of Interstellar https://t.co/cwUkIFaQJN

    47K1.7K18968933K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 202695x their median

    Today’s agenda at Apple Park: Introduce the @Pokemon team to John, talk gaming, and politely ask Pikachu to stay out of the pond. Two out of three were accomplished. https://t.co/KzirV3VX8U

    41K4.4K6876563.4M viewsView on X
  • Jul 17, 202393x their median

    Stain-resistant & easy to clean https://t.co/yp2RxFP6Fm

    38K3.5K2.5K2.7K87M viewsView on X
  • Aug 17, 202665x their median

    Origin, our code hosting platform, is now live. It's fast, easy to use, and deeply integrated with Cursor. Get started by syncing your repos from GitHub. https://t.co/aqRHavAOQg

    26K2.4K1.5K2.8K26M viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 202636x their median

    The HSR bridge is not expensive, just 6.9 billion RMB, roughly 1.5 days of US military spending on Iran war. Without war, the world would be much, much better. https://t.co/iSy6J414Jb

    15K2.3K1461581.5M viewsView on X
  • Aug 20, 202634x their median

    Strategy, amplified. https://t.co/9xblesDexN

    13K1.3K1.5K6672.1M viewsView on X
  • Aug 18, 202627x their median

    Ride in Robotaxi through 8/23 for a shot to attend our Cybercab launch event More rides = better odds https://t.co/NxA4H9sWF2

    11K1.4K5796001.8M viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 202624x their median

    Robotaxi now runs 6am to 10pm, 7 days/week Unsupervised fleet is a lot bigger Also, upgraded intelligence in vehicle distribution & routing means you wait less https://t.co/UFZ4bqg2dZ

    10K1.3K460229981K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#gta

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 498 interactions against 2.0M followers, an engagement rate of 0.025%. Measured over 250 original posts, its engagement rate beats 61% of 3,758 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 62K times each, and 0.803% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.03% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 20.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 53% of days. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 250 posts sampled, 66% carry an image or video, 6% are part of a thread and 11% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 141K interactions, about 282x its own typical post.

What is Whole Mars Catalog's engagement rate on X?
Whole Mars Catalog (@wholemars) has an engagement rate of 0.025%, based on the median interactions across 250 original posts from the last 30 days against 2,046,979 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.025%, Whole Mars Catalog sits above the 25th percentile of the 36,378 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @wholemars have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 61% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,758 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @wholemars post?
Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 20.3 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going