Back to @wesbos's profile

Wes Bos engagement report

@wesbos - 446K followers on X

Measured over 61 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 24, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.067%
of 446K followers
Per impression
0.887%
33K views on a typical post
Reach
7.57%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
295
interactions (median)
Saved
0.09%
30 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
3.6/day
active 97% of days
Peak time
14:00 UTC
Friday

A typical post picks up 295 interactions against 446K followers, an engagement rate of 0.067%. Measured over 61 original posts, its engagement rate beats 64% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 33K times each, and 0.887% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 7.46% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 61 posts sampled, 72% carry an image or video, 11% are part of a thread and 15% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 17K interactions, about 58x its own typical post.

Measured over 61 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 24, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Wes Bos's engagement rate beats 64% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 44% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.067%, Wes Bos sits above the 25th percentile of the 212,482 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.025% to 0.146%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.146%
p750.696%
p902.61%
p9982.9%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 212,482 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,403 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.146%
75th percentile0.696%
90th percentile2.61%
99th percentile82.9%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 14:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video72% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link15% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 72% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 15% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 151 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jul 30, 202658x their median

    🫠 kid threw a car at our 70” Samsung frame TV and now it has a permanent white spot / raised knick in the polarizer Has anyone fixed this? (In child or tv) https://t.co/x560Sxq0sf

    16K36491522.4M viewsView on X
  • Sep 10, 202652x their median

    we got toothbrush DRM before GTA6 https://t.co/8CuC3isPYa

    15K4707023241K viewsView on X
  • Sep 3, 202638x their median

    If your air conditioning stops working, it is likely just a $20 capacitor you can swap out in 5 minutes HVAC guys live off these $500 jobs https://t.co/4ENwN9gUo4

    10K59260169473K viewsView on X
  • Sep 5, 202636x their median

    Happy to report I can still lift all my kids https://t.co/8C1ADhiwI9

    10K19916618140K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 202619x their median

    Y'all need to stop SLACKING on your photo upload UIs If I upload a HEIC, AVIF or literally any format. JUST CONVERT IT IN THE BROWSER It's the image is too large for you, RESIZE IT IN THE BROWSER If I drag and image anywhere in your application HANDLE IT INSTEAD OF REFRESHING THE PAGE We have the technology! Unacceptable

    5.2K20014027189K viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 202618x their median

    guy was charged $22,000 to charge his Kia EV9 6% The letter spacing tells me everything I need to know about who is responsible for this https://t.co/Yl0ZOIcdv0

    5.1K10432889K viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 202613x their median

    Get yourself a Bosch 800 series dishwasher. Go into debt if you have to. https://t.co/dZIcnicwYF

    3.2K51494641.2M viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 202612x their median

    We've been dealing with an incredible amount of abuse on ClinePass recently as well. That's 8 billion with a B. Thank you @stripe 🙏 https://t.co/2UyXsotDOQ

    3.3K6111662808K viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 20267.5x their median

    duuuuude, I got a dell! Thanks @dhh Apparently this is supposed to be the machine that rivals the MacBook Pro hardware. Feels amazing, all metal shell, nice 24” OLED screen. Let see how mad we can make the Linux bros running Omarchy https://t.co/EvT4E4aVug

    2.0K201879212K viewsView on X
  • Aug 14, 20266.5x their median

    This is the most important video I've ever made. In this, I explore the negative and positive mental health effects of AI coding, with data and expert commentary. https://t.co/GPx7sJaJ5y

    1.6K1614949986K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 295 interactions against 446K followers, an engagement rate of 0.067%. Measured over 61 original posts, its engagement rate beats 64% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 33K times each, and 0.887% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 7.46% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 61 posts sampled, 72% carry an image or video, 11% are part of a thread and 15% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 17K interactions, about 58x its own typical post.

What is Wes Bos's engagement rate on X?
Wes Bos (@wesbos) has an engagement rate of 0.067%, based on the median interactions across 61 original posts from the last 30 days against 446,203 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.067%, Wes Bos sits above the 25th percentile of the 212,482 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @wesbos have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 64% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @wesbos post?
Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 3.6 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going