Back to @wenzhaocomment's profile

文昭談古論今 engagement report

@wenzhaocomment - 382K followers on X

Measured over 7 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026.

Engagement

Per follower
0.115%
of 382K followers
Per impression
0.534%
82K views on a typical post
Reach
21.6%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
440
interactions (median)
Saved
0.033%
27 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.6/day
active 50% of days
Peak time
16:00 UTC
Sunday

Early reading. We have captured 7 original posts for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.

A typical post picks up 440 interactions against 382K followers, an engagement rate of 0.115%. Posts are seen about 82K times each, and 0.534% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 21.6% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.6 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 50% of days. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 7 posts sampled, 71% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 6.7K interactions, about 15x its own typical post. Only 7 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

Measured over 7 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.115%, 文昭談古論今 sits above the 50th percentile of the 37,856 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.081% to 0.439%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.081%
p750.439%
p902.10%
p99155.6%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 37,856 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 97,248 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.081%
75th percentile0.439%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile155.6%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 16:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%53K
01:00 UTC-2%53K
02:00 UTC-3%52K
03:00 UTC-4%55K
04:00 UTC-6%44K
05:00 UTC-4%43K
06:00 UTC-4%50K
07:00 UTC-5%54K
08:00 UTC-4%63K
09:00 UTC-3%72K
10:00 UTC-2%75K
11:00 UTC-3%81K
12:00 UTC-2%90K
13:00 UTC-2%98K
14:00 UTC-3%101K
15:00 UTC-2%105K
16:00 UTC-4%102K
17:00 UTC-3%95K
18:00 UTC-1%88K
19:00 UTC-2%83K
20:00 UTC-1%77K
21:00 UTC-1%69K
22:00 UTC-2%60K
23:00 UTC-2%53K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%238K
Monday0%302K
Tuesday-3%302K
Wednesday-1%257K
Thursday-2%250K
Friday-3%259K
Saturday+3%233K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Jun 10, 202615x their median

    最近中共确实改变打法了 之前中共骚扰我家里人,都是恐吓之类的 再发就把你如何如何,即使在国外也逃不出我的控制之类 但是最近思路变成劝我回国了,甚至给出了非常清晰的条件 把骂习近平的都删了,再也不骂习近平了 父母就能放一个出来 只要我不骂中共,单纯聊经济问题,顺带天天骂美国,骂台湾,骂日本,我父母就都可以出国 而如果没事我能夸夸中共,做到小骂大帮忙,国安保证我能回国 国安为了增加公信力,还给我家人看了一堆“大V”的发言,作为正面合作案例 当然考虑到国安有可能在挑拨离间,我就不点名了

    5.4K2481.0K481.3M viewsView on X
  • Jun 13, 20264.7x their median

    最近看到方脸/李老师和二大爷的公开争吵,说真的,心里挺难过的。 海外反共圈里本来就没几个正常人了 —— 什么民运川粉、法轮功,我真的正眼都懒得看一眼。但这三位,虽然我们不是所有观点都一致,但他们一直是我觉得有清晰逻辑和三观比较正的大V。 OpenAI的报告里没有提到我,我也不是中国人,应该没有人觉得我有批评中共的义务,那么我想作为局外人说说我的想法。 首先,我认为我们没有理由去要求一个博主选择批评谁,不批评谁。 这件事的起因,应该是方脸指出二爷过去15篇推文都没有批评中共,作为一个以批评中共为主成名的博主,这不正常。后面再有OpenAI那篇报告,就前后呼应起来。 我的粉丝群大家也有在讨论这件事,当时我就说:“其实如果你们去看我的推,难道我不也这样吗?我现在批评中共比以前少得多。你们为啥不觉得有问题呢?” 我的粉丝们不觉得有什么问题,也是因为我早在去年中旬左右,就已经在我好几个群里都说过:川普现在的所作所为,很多时候甚至比中共还流氓,还不要脸。当那些我一直用来作为批评中共的价值体系,被川普彻底摧毁之后,我发现我已经逐渐失去了批评中共的底气和兴趣。 我不知道二大爷减少批评中共是什么原因,但这是我的原因。从二大爷对川普的很多评价来看,我相信应该也差不多。 我批评中共,并不是因为中共迫害了我或损害了我什么利益。 我批评中共,是因为我相信民主制度,我认为人民应该有言论自由、社会应该有新闻自由。我反对中共,是因为我反专制,因为我相信普世价值观。 那么,现在我批评川普,是同样的理由。我骂的是一个发币、老婆发币、公然挑战三权分立、威胁法官、公开骂记者是猪、赦免多名罪犯、操纵股市、满嘴谎言、不敢公开爱泼斯坦文件的川普。 一个博主当然可以说,他选择自己的赛道,不评论美国的事。但你不能说别人也应该跟你是同样的赛道。 其实我反而认为,如果你的反共不是立场,而是反对上面我说的这些中共所代表的价值观的话,那么反共的人必然也应该是反川的。 就像我过去一年来一直在骂反共华川粉和轮媒的:反共却挺川的人,其实你反共只不过是因为这是你的立场,或跟你的利益相关;你反共并不是基于普世价值。 以前我们说,小粉红天天批评美国,但从来不去批评中共的问题。 所以天天批评中共却从来不谴责川普那些跟中共同样流氓的行为的人,难道不是跟小粉红一样吗?你们只是站在不同的立场罢了。 批评川普对我而言是没有任何好处的,我因为批评川普掉了非常多粉。 但我做自媒体本来就不是为了谋生,而是为了表达我的价值观,传播我的认知。 如果我不说真话,那我干脆退网安心享受人生了。 最后我想说,我认为大家吵起来之后,确实语言就控制不住,有很多话真的没必要。 比如发李币这件事,我当时做节目的时候就说过,虽然李老师也许不应该选择这个方式来融资,但我一点都不怀疑李老师的动机。确实后来也证明了,李老师团队这两年来做了很多事(赛博信访局、https://t.co/VvwYIB98Ur、https://t.co/MMzeJo4oim、海外黑手党、等等),如果靠单枪匹马和用爱发电,是不可能的。 这跟很多海外反共圈那帮靠耍嘴皮子、造谣和听床的人完全不同,李老师这些项目都是实打实帮助到人们的,我认为不应该大家某方面价值观不一样,就一直揪着这个不放。 各位,我好像极少看到粉红大V们公开吵架的,再加上民运川粉、法轮功媒体已经把海外反共搞得乌烟瘴气了,仅剩的几位正常人,就不要再内讧了吧。 其实,这样吵来吵去,中共已经赢了。

    1.5K7245629421K viewsView on X
  • Aug 7, 20264.2x their median

    果不其然,在我谈中共的出入境新规的两期YouTube节目下,出现了大量的留言,称:身正不怕影斜,没干坏事,有什么可怕的呢?只要是不反华、不洗钱的“普通人”就不受到影响...中共到处上监控的时候,也有人这样说:“你要没干坏事,怕什么监控呢?” 这是典型的把政府滥权,变成对公民个人的道德质疑,潜台词是:出来反对的人,就是心里有鬼的,就是潜在的坏份子。既然你是清白的,就没有必要反对。 在这种腔调下,中共自然而然地处于不容置疑的地位,可以做任何事不需要辩解;而公民说NO, 反而需要不断地为自己辩解。 2019年香港市民反对《逃犯修订条例》上百万人上街,按这种逻辑,他们都是心里有鬼的,是身斜影歪的。 中国人最需要的观念是:把权利和财产、和生命等量齐观。你必须保有你的权利,你才有安全的边界,在受保护边界之内的一切才是属于你的。没有权利,等于你家没有围墙、没有门和窗。风可以进、雨可以进、阿猫阿狗可以进、小偷强盗都可以进。放弃权利,是开门揖盗,是拱手让出自己的一切,包括你的小命。 说“没干坏事,不怕监控”的,除了水军,不知还有哪些人?这些人正是我节目中说的:先懦弱、后愚蠢。当人需要为自己的怯懦不断找理由辩护的时候,就越发的愚蠢。

    1.4K18321919145K viewsView on X
  • Jul 6, 20264.2x their median

    今天我們都是矢板明夫 這是一場在台灣土地上的「跨境政治行刑」。已入籍台灣的矢板明夫遭中國籍現行犯潛伏偷襲,此案手法縝密、變裝潛逃,擺明是中共新法上路後的跨國鎮壓。今天我們都是矢板明夫,面對红色黑幫侵門踏戶,台灣不容暴力恫嚇,唯有團結抗中,才能守護民主言論底線。 https://t.co/YvBQPP7bRm

    1.3K2492481757K viewsView on X
  • Jun 14, 20263.1x their median

    真的心累 我自认为,我说出中共在通过不同手段影响海外大V,让大家把注意力转移到台湾/日本/美国问题时 可以警示大家,让大家认清楚中共的影响 没想到有的人,不会反思,只会愤怒 而且这次最搞笑的是,恰巧就在第二天,OpenAI这个独立第三方就给出了强有力的证据 那看到证据,我心想总该反思一下是不是真的上当了吧? 没想到是更加强烈的,恼羞成怒的,甚至还呼朋引伴式的拉着打手对你进行人身攻击 诈骗犯/卖惨/一事无成/反共就是为了赚钱,一切粉红用过的帽子就都扣了上来 你只是提了一个建议,对方就把你定义为一事无成的罪犯 面子,就比真相重要的多呗? 我也更加深刻理解了历史上昏君为什么那么多了 为什么那么多昏君听不进去建议了 警惕吧,希望我之后,不要变成油盐不进,信息闭塞,且自视甚高的人

    1.1K382044123K viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 20262.9x their median

    凡是说“你行你来”的,今天统一回复:我来?一点问题都没有。请你问问习近平有没有问题。

    1.1K19143682K viewsView on X
  • Jun 10, 20262.2x their median

    前两天租了一辆FSD的特斯拉 我之前是知道FSD牛逼,但是特斯拉这个输入目的地,几十公里都不用管一下,全程还能自动超车变道,开的比我都好 甚至自动识别车内人数主动上carpool lane(两人车道) 确实震惊到我了 感觉自己的车和特斯拉比,就是塞班系统vs智能机 话说国内的自动驾驶啥水平呢?

    663103122177K viewsView on X
  • Jun 10, 20262.0x their median

    习近平戴眼镜的形象,是国内的官宣中从来没有展现过的,这次是朝鲜官媒发了这样的照片。今天搜了一圈发现,习近平的禁忌是中共历代党魁里最多的,身高、眼镜全是禁忌。连毛泽东都有少量的戴老花镜的照片,真是没人比习近平事儿多🤣 https://t.co/P0poq0fXiX

    78228853382K viewsView on X
  • Jun 4, 20261.8x their median

    卢比奥通过美国驻中国使领馆官号发出纪念“六四”的声明—直言许多人被杀害,“任何严厉的审查都无法抹杀历史”,牺牲的人“终有一天会得到昭雪”。 希望看到年初提到的,美国政府开发的翻墙工具尽快面世,这是当下支持渴望自由的中国人最实际的行动。 https://t.co/U8USkJwPmE

    6688161033K viewsView on X
  • Jul 25, 20261.7x their median

    總有人攻擊我對法輪功的態度,甚至造謠我被收買或加入該組織。我既不修鍊,也無信仰,就算想加入,人家也不要我啊!我支持法輪功完全出於我支持所有在中共統治下受迫害者的道義,與支持民運、維權律師、維吾爾人、藏人、港人、基督教等其他人士的出發點沒有區別。法輪功人士所表現出的真誠、善良,大紀元新唐人希望之聲自由門對揭露真相的媒體貢獻,以及遠勝華人散沙社會的團結和動員能力,甚至深入參與西方公民社會建設的能力,值得任何有識之士的支持和欽佩。可以說到目前為止,所有罵法輪功的人,沒有一個比法輪功做得更好。 https://t.co/N916WzjjNR

    59986601655K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 440 interactions against 382K followers, an engagement rate of 0.115%. Posts are seen about 82K times each, and 0.534% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 21.6% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.6 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 50% of days. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 7 posts sampled, 71% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 6.7K interactions, about 15x its own typical post. Only 7 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

What is 文昭談古論今's engagement rate on X?
文昭談古論今 (@wenzhaocomment) has an engagement rate of 0.115%, based on the median interactions across 7 original posts from the last 30 days against 381,983 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.115%, 文昭談古論今 sits above the 50th percentile of the 37,856 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @wenzhaocomment have real engagement?
There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
When does @wenzhaocomment post?
Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.6 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going