Back to @weizhishu77's profile

未知数 engagement report

@weizhishu77 - 378K followers on X

Measured over 11 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 4, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.195%
of 378K followers
Per impression
0.825%
86K views on a typical post
Reach
23.6%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
712
interactions (median)
Saved
0.089%
77 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.47/day
active 33% of days
Peak time
06:00 UTC
Saturday

A typical post picks up 712 interactions against 378K followers, an engagement rate of 0.195%. Measured over 11 original posts, its engagement rate beats 81% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 86K times each, and 0.825% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 22.8% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.47 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 06:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 11 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 9% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 7.7K interactions, about 11x its own typical post.

Measured over 11 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 4, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

未知数's engagement rate beats 81% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 42% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.195%, 未知数 sits above the 50th percentile of the 204,798 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.143% to 0.678%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,798 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,879 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 06:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 06:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 06:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Saturday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Saturday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--8%-9% to -7%41K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 48 characters, which falls in the under 80 characters band. Across the catalog, posts under 80 characters run 8% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 3, 202611x their median

    好久不见。 https://t.co/6wk7se66iO

    7.1K1334990214K viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 20263.4x their median

    半年不上,以为粉都掉完了,咋还不降反增了呢? https://t.co/PP1XzS14ON

    2.0K494200114K viewsView on X
  • Oct 1, 20252.8x their median

    逛到一处儿童乐园,猪猪童心+色欲散发,自发上前摆起各种淫荡的姿势,童趣与色情碰撞出反差的情调。 https://t.co/rpgRXA5I1Y

    1.9K103210275K viewsView on X
  • Oct 9, 20252.2x their median

    太热了,透透气。 https://t.co/WdiQsH4XHq

    1.5K79280295K viewsView on X
  • Oct 2, 20252.2x their median

    每一次露出都能激发猪猪内心深处的本性,跟随着夜色,露出的尺度越来越大…… https://t.co/ypwZDuvkjY

    1.5K70251254K viewsView on X
  • Sep 6, 20261.9x their median

    日常的见面,比简单的活动更值得期待。 https://t.co/QmpFthKFpb

    939284200219K viewsView on X
  • Jan 1, 20251.9x their median

    年复一年。 新年快乐! https://t.co/0Qb5Ttxux2

    1.2K58351284K viewsView on X
  • Sep 7, 20261.8x their median

    我帮你擦擦,你帮我擦擦。 https://t.co/vGDjxV97hO

    685225860206K viewsView on X
  • Sep 12, 20261.6x their median

    猪猪平常的穿搭偏休闲,很少有露肤度这么高的,也只有见“好朋友”才会这么穿…… https://t.co/e4iDd4tCW1

    880132560191K viewsView on X
  • Oct 1, 20251.5x their median

    书接上回:吃饭的时候,猪猪表达不喜欢按部就班的回家上床做爱,好久没有露出野战了,于是决定到附近的公园玩点刺激的。 到了公园,时间还早,时不时碰到跑步散步的路人。刚开始,猪猪只能小心翼翼的露出。 https://t.co/W0liNldA5O

    1.0K41201251K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 712 interactions against 378K followers, an engagement rate of 0.195%. Measured over 11 original posts, its engagement rate beats 81% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 86K times each, and 0.825% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 22.8% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.47 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 06:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 11 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 9% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 7.7K interactions, about 11x its own typical post.

What is 未知数's engagement rate on X?
未知数 (@weizhishu77) has an engagement rate of 0.195%, based on the median interactions across 11 original posts from the last 30 days against 378,040 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.195%, 未知数 sits above the 50th percentile of the 204,798 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @weizhishu77 have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 81% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @weizhishu77 post?
Most posts go out around 06:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.47 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going