Back to @web3_marine's profile

MARINE engagement report

@web3_marine - 147K followers on X

Measured over 9 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 26, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.208%
of 147K followers
Per impression
3.31%
9.2K views on a typical post
Reach
6.28%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
305
interactions (median)
Saved
0.011%
1 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.37/day
active 63% of days
Peak time
04:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 305 interactions against 147K followers, an engagement rate of 0.208%. Measured over 9 original posts, its engagement rate beats 67% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 9.2K times each, and 3.31% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 6.26% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.4 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 63% of days. Most posts go out around 04:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 9 posts sampled, 56% carry an image or video and 11% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.7K interactions, about 5.7x its own typical post.

Measured over 9 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 26, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

MARINE's engagement rate beats 67% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 76% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.208%, MARINE sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,881 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.143% to 0.68%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.68%
p902.56%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,881 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,891 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.68%
90th percentile2.56%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 04:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 04:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 04:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video56% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link11% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 56% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 11% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 188 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 30, 20245.7x their median

    GM WEB 3 KINGS & QUEENS ☀️☕️ Have a wonderful week if ya also a RYAN PRO MAX supporter 💪 https://t.co/gi0Hmsw8QE

    1.0K1305791188K viewsView on X
  • Sep 20, 20261.9x their median

    Got approved for both @zaddrnet and @BITFOOTS_ GTD spots!! These are two of the most hyped projects on ZEC and I can’t wait to see them cooking I’m officially a real hunter with BitFoots now 😂 No beef though, I can still vouch/nominate for a few mfers in the comments. https://t.co/jKNJie9bfp

    32924233024K viewsView on X
  • Aug 20, 20261.7x their median

    NFTs

    4056103826K viewsView on X
  • Sep 25, 20261.5x their median

    Starting to hear some rumors of a Joe Biden token launching soon on robinhood chain. crime season is back?

    26720171014K viewsView on X
  • Sep 14, 2026

    Looks like there are no more stimmies from @world_xyz My life is cooked 😭 https://t.co/bzG9AqSteJ

    23618104113K viewsView on X
  • Sep 24, 2026

    So, your “KOL” didn’t tell you about @BITFOOTS_? Need to get that mf arrested 😂😂 https://t.co/8H0zrUjcaW

    206510209.2K viewsView on X
  • Sep 10, 2026

    People were surprised by @world_xyz yesterday! But it was a different story for me and maybe others 🫠 X wouldn’t connect, the site kept throwing errors and some got X linked but never saw any rewards. Later, the Trade & Earn tab went offline, and now the whole site is completely down. Our lives are ruined 😭 World needs to re-launch their stimmy or else we’re cooked.

    1721511807.2K viewsView on X
  • Sep 17, 2026

    Some mfs call themselves KOLs but haven’t made a single trade in the last 8 months 😭 How are you supposed to talk about the market when you’re not even in it?

    1751310005.7K viewsView on X
  • Sep 20, 2026

    I'm applying for the @zeccatnft whitelist My Zeccat Entry Pass is ZC-7D6C8B4F973E. Community preview only. https://t.co/8uXewbvx9T

    146238519.5K viewsView on X
  • Aug 18, 2026

    MineBit’s weekly Poker Freeroll is back, with $700 in the prize pool🃏 Entry is free and you just need to complete a few social quests to secure your spot If you’re into poker, it’s worth checking out Link: https://t.co/rqeitYe9DF Discord: https://t.co/4HWxB0h8NI NFA/DYOR https://t.co/4phxlEjrEl

    16827407.6K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 305 interactions against 147K followers, an engagement rate of 0.208%. Measured over 9 original posts, its engagement rate beats 67% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 9.2K times each, and 3.31% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 6.26% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.4 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 63% of days. Most posts go out around 04:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 9 posts sampled, 56% carry an image or video and 11% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.7K interactions, about 5.7x its own typical post.

What is MARINE's engagement rate on X?
MARINE (@web3_marine) has an engagement rate of 0.208%, based on the median interactions across 9 original posts from the last 30 days against 147,000 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.208%, MARINE sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,881 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @web3_marine have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 67% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @web3_marine post?
Most posts go out around 04:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.37 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going