Back to @washghost1's profile

Washingtons ghost engagement report

@washghost1 - 471K followers on X

Measured over 31 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 23, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.015%
of 471K followers
Per impression
0.786%
8.8K views on a typical post
Reach
1.86%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
69
interactions (median)
Saved
0.034%
3 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.67/day
active 10% of days
Peak time
19:00 UTC
Friday

A typical post picks up 69 interactions against 471K followers, an engagement rate of 0.015%. Measured over 31 original posts, its engagement rate beats 39% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 8.8K times each, and 0.786% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.86% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 10% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 31 posts sampled, 90% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 61K interactions, about 382x its own typical post.

Measured over 31 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 23, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Washingtons ghost's engagement rate beats 39% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 41% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.015%, Washingtons ghost sits above the 10th percentile of the 205,048 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,048 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 19:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 19:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 19:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video90% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 90% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 149 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Mar 1, 2026382x their median

    POV: Your kid begs for a hamburger. You get him a hamburger. https://t.co/THZyzwElxd

    41K2.0K13K4.8K28M viewsView on X
  • Oct 23, 2026308x their median

    JUST IN: Palmer Luckey's genetically modified military dog startup, Warhound, comes out of stealth, aiming to create enhanced canines for the U.S. military. https://t.co/8LHGmOUSqM

    18K9921.1K1.1K2.5M viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 2026301x their median

    🚨WOW, they weren't kidding... A 300-pound lioness and her cub really are on the loose in Indiana The lioness was wearing a BLUE HARNESS. Nobody reported a missing lion. No sanctuary is short a lion. No permits exist to own a lion in that county. Somebody in Indiana has an illegal lion and suddenly REAL quiet🤣 Source: NYP, G101-3 on FB / Writer: Daniel

    18K1.8K4793341.2M viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 2026288x their median

    Crazy body cam footage captured in Oklahoma as a man attempts to shoot a flame thrower at police serving an eviction notice. https://t.co/xsH5u8ttL5

    19K7512243206.5M viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 2026254x their median

    In 2008, 18-year-old Queena Phu drove to a Florida library after dark to return a book. She was on the phone with a friend. Then the screaming started. The call cut off. 16-year-old Kendrick Morris dragged her behind the building, raped her, and beat her until her brain was so damaged she would never see, walk, or speak again. He left her in the dirt like she was already dead. She wasn’t. When police ran the DNA, they found he had already raped a 62-year-old daycare worker at knifepoint months earlier. In 2011 he was convicted of both attacks and sentenced to 65 years. Because he was a juvenile, the Supreme Court later gave him a second chance in court. In 2017 he came back asking for less time. The judge looked at what he did to Queena — and gave him three consecutive life sentences instead. 18 years later, Queena still needs round-the-clock care. He is still asking the system for mercy. She never got a resentencing. He did. Should a 16-year-old who leaves a girl blind, silent, and paralyzed for life ever walk free?

    11K2.7K3.7K460414K viewsView on X
  • Oct 21, 2026190x their median

    Homesteader complains to United Airlines about flight school doing drills very low, directly above his property. And he gets raided by the FBI in response. https://t.co/FBCxZILgge

    11K1.7K243107543K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 2026112x their median

    Leftist lunatics just dumped blue paint all over MAGA supporters inside a Starbucks in Los Angeles. These people are absolutely disgusting. I’m so freaking tired of this shit. They should have gotten their asses beat. https://t.co/6Eqw2wjZDy

    4.5K1.5K1.5K210154K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 202695x their median

    This is basically a slice of cake and they want 75k for it https://t.co/7pgukHXOXd

    5.4K32880081206K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 202689x their median

    A two-car accident on Saturday night in Montgomery killed 20-year-old Landon Dunn. Landon was a US Marine who worked with a close friend in the Marine Corps for about a year and a half. He was killed in the crash while on his way to see his family and girlfriend. His loved ones have lost a son, a brother and a friend they will never get to see again. Rest easy Landon.

    4.7K9084905852K viewsView on X
  • Oct 23, 202685x their median

    This is what our border will look like if Democrats win https://t.co/dhyvyhmbou

    5.0K75313536113K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 69 interactions against 471K followers, an engagement rate of 0.015%. Measured over 31 original posts, its engagement rate beats 39% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 8.8K times each, and 0.786% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.86% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 10% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 31 posts sampled, 90% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 61K interactions, about 382x its own typical post.

What is Washingtons ghost's engagement rate on X?
Washingtons ghost (@washghost1) has an engagement rate of 0.015%, based on the median interactions across 31 original posts from the last 30 days against 470,966 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.015%, Washingtons ghost sits above the 10th percentile of the 205,048 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @washghost1 have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 39% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @washghost1 post?
Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.67 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going