Back to @wangzhian8848's profile

王局志安 engagement report

@wangzhian8848 - 1.5M followers on X

Measured over 95 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 31, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.047%
of 1.5M followers
Per impression
0.353%
202K views on a typical post
Reach
13.3%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
714
interactions (median)
Saved
0.014%
29 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
5.2/day
active 63% of days
Peak time
00:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 714 interactions against 1.5M followers, an engagement rate of 0.047%. Measured over 95 original posts, its engagement rate beats 73% of 3,758 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 202K times each, and 0.353% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 13.3% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 5.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 63% of days. Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 95 posts sampled, 43% carry an image or video and 12% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 7.4K interactions, about 10x its own typical post.

Measured over 95 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 31, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

王局志安's engagement rate beats 73% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,758 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 31% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.047%, 王局志安 sits above the 25th percentile of the 36,378 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.012% to 0.08%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.08%
p750.432%
p902.10%
p99161.0%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 36,378 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 107,364 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.08%
75th percentile0.432%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile161.0%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 00:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 00:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 00:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%50K
01:00 UTC-2%51K
02:00 UTC-3%50K
03:00 UTC-4%53K
04:00 UTC-6%43K
05:00 UTC-4%42K
06:00 UTC-4%48K
07:00 UTC-5%52K
08:00 UTC-4%60K
09:00 UTC-3%69K
10:00 UTC-2%72K
11:00 UTC-3%78K
12:00 UTC-2%86K
13:00 UTC-2%94K
14:00 UTC-4%97K
15:00 UTC-2%100K
16:00 UTC-3%97K
17:00 UTC-2%90K
18:00 UTC-1%84K
19:00 UTC-2%79K
20:00 UTC-1%74K
21:00 UTC-1%66K
22:00 UTC-2%57K
23:00 UTC-2%51K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+4%230K
Monday0%286K
Tuesday-2%276K
Wednesday-1%251K
Thursday-1%244K
Friday-3%252K
Saturday+3%227K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Aug 17, 202610x their median

    【令和8年8月千葉豪雨】 被災された皆さまにお見舞い申し上げます。 日本財団は、被災地での支援活動などを迅速に進めて参ります。 「令和8年8月千葉豪雨緊急支援募金」では、寄付金を募っております。 いただいた寄付金は間接経費を差し引かず、全額を被災地支援に活用いたします。

    6.3K85113712819M viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 20269.7x their median

    救援队赶到吉隆口岸,什么都没了。 https://t.co/sPC0yf0Prc

    6.0K310537331.9M viewsView on X
  • Jan 7, 20259.1x their median

    我们专门建了一个投稿邮箱,欢迎各种突发新闻,社会事件,行业内幕的投稿。 投稿信箱如下: [email protected] 感谢🙏

    2.1K3584.0K3820M viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 20267.5x their median

    景甜已经完了。 https://t.co/ZJb3qRbqpM

    3.8K871.4K264.5M viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 20266.1x their median

    孙宇晨和他妈妈的八卦,立即压住了吉隆泥石流的灾难,感觉像网信办策划的。

    3.5K57741141.2M viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 20265.9x their median

    流亡者看到故国遭遇灾难,应该同悲,应该想着施救。如果见到国内遭遇大灾而欣喜,那不是流亡者,那是homeless,没有祖国的人。

    3.5K6460525635K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 20265.6x their median

    我说准备移民,好多国家的华人出来用中文说,你可不要来我们澳大利亚,我们加拿大不欢迎你,美国你是别想来了。 什么时候澳大利亚成你家的了?你不欢迎我,我还不能去加拿大了?你在美国,我就不能去了? 这些人看起来都得了小粉红病。小粉红一个重要特征,就是误以为国家是他的。他们不知道的是,旁人都把他们当神经病。

    3.1K2784725628K viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 20265.1x their median

    长期以来,很多人一谈习近平,就讥讽他“小学毕业”“没文化”“只会念稿”“还经常念错字”,仿佛证明了这些,就完成了对习的政治批判。 我一直觉得,这种批评很廉价。 评价一个政治人物,首先看的是他的治国路线和政策,而不是文凭有多高、口才有多好、个人修养有多棒。这些当然会增加政治人物的魅力,但政治人物不是教授和主持人,也不是来参加诗词大会的。 习近平这十几年真正值得研究的,是他如何反腐集权,强化党的领导,重塑意识形态和社会控制,改变经济政策和外交路线,并把中国带到了今天这个位置。 你可以认为这些政策正确,也可以认为它们失败,造成了严重后果,这才叫政治批判。 把习说成一个什么都不懂的“小学生”,反而可能让你低估他。一个能在十几年里如此深刻重塑中共权力结构的人,你可以反对他,但不能只靠嘲笑来认识他。 如果批评习近平最后只剩下“小学生”三个字,不是习太浅,而是你的批评太浅。 嘲笑只有在表达你的立场和态度的时候,才有价值。拿嘲笑代替分析,拿优越感冒充洞察力,则是最低级的政治评论。

    3.1K11343813858K viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 20263.7x their median

    穷人对富人的一个错误想象,就是按照财富比例算对方的花销,比如自己吃顿早点花十块钱,占自己一个月收入的千分之一。一个亿万富豪吃早点花一万钱,他应该觉得不贵。 但问题是早餐大家都是喝豆浆吃油条,你花十块人家花一万真的合适吗? 我的印象,大多数富人其实计算方式和我们都差不多,他们会在穷人们根本消费不起的领域一掷千金,比如私人飞机,游艇,但在普通消费上,他们也不会去花冤枉钱,比如同样喝豆浆吃油条,你花十块管他要一万,他不是付不起一万,但他也会感觉被宰了。

    2.0K5960017494K viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 20263.4x their median

    翠上关于吉隆泥石流,主要有两种,一是说上游中方修了水坝,水坝溃堤导致泥石流,第二就说活该的。 满满的恶意和谣言。 吉隆口岸上游的河流,没有任何水坝。

    1.9K345088421K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 714 interactions against 1.5M followers, an engagement rate of 0.047%. Measured over 95 original posts, its engagement rate beats 73% of 3,758 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 202K times each, and 0.353% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 13.3% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 5.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 63% of days. Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 95 posts sampled, 43% carry an image or video and 12% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 7.4K interactions, about 10x its own typical post.

What is 王局志安's engagement rate on X?
王局志安 (@wangzhian8848) has an engagement rate of 0.047%, based on the median interactions across 95 original posts from the last 30 days against 1,522,814 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.047%, 王局志安 sits above the 25th percentile of the 36,378 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @wangzhian8848 have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 73% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,758 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @wangzhian8848 post?
Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 5.2 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going