Wall St Engine engagement report
@wallstengine - 205K followers on X
Measured over 82 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 12, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 149 interactions against 205K followers, an engagement rate of 0.074%. Measured over 82 original posts, its engagement rate beats 54% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 28K times each, and 0.533% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 13.6% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 82 posts sampled, 60% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.2K interactions, about 8.2x its own typical post.
Measured over 82 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 12, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
Wall St Engine's engagement rate beats 54% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 28% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.074%, Wall St Engine sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,152 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.678% |
| 90th percentile | 2.55% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 12:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 60% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 5% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | +15% | +14% to +16% | 32K |
- 60% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 5% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 417 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Sep 15, 20268.2x their median
UK finance teams have waited long enough. Ramp is now live in the UK. Sorry we’re late. https://t.co/zajnLsZtPJ https://t.co/TprtPXSLPR
- Oct 9, 20266.5x their median
Lumentum $LITE CEO says its optical components are "completely sold out" through early 2029 on demand for faster AI data centers.
- Sep 15, 20266.1x their median
$META CEO Mark Zuckerberg says he doesn’t think the AI industry needs a coordinated pause. Each lab should slow down on its own when safety requires it, and that alignment will increasingly become a competitive advantage because people won’t use AI agents they can’t trust. Meta already delayed Muse for several months to address safety and security issues without asking other labs to pause with it. Zuckerberg also said Meta has committed the significant majority of its compute to serving users rather than racing toward recursive AI self-improvement.
- Sep 15, 20265.9x their median
$META TO ROLL OUT TWO NEW IN-HOUSE AI CHIPS IN 2027, PLANS 1GW+ OF CUSTOM SILICON CAPACITY Meta plans to begin deploying its new MTIA 450 chip, code-named Arke, across data centers in the first half of 2027, as it pushes to reduce the cost and energy required to run AI models. The next-generation MTIA 500, code-named Astrid, is expected to finish design work in roughly a month and enter data centers by the end of 2027. Meta expects Astrid to be deployed even more broadly than Arke. Meta is working with Broadcom $AVGO on chip design and TSMC on manufacturing. The company has already committed to more than 1 gigawatt of capacity using its custom chips over a 12-month period and expects deployment to accelerate after that. Meta received its first 12 Arke chips from TSMC on Sept. 1. Early testing showed performance within 2% to 3% of simulations, and the chips were able to run models from Meta, DeepSeek and Alibaba on the first day. The chips are designed primarily as general-purpose inference “workhorses,” rather than for the fastest latency-sensitive workloads. Meta says its close coordination between its AI teams and chip designers allows the hardware to deliver better performance per watt and per dollar for its own workloads than current NVIDIA systems. Meta also canceled a previously planned chip called Olympus, which was intended to handle both AI training and inference, after determining that such a design could cost roughly 30% more. The company is instead concentrating its custom silicon roadmap on lower-cost inference at gigawatt scale. After Astrid, Meta plans to focus future generations on higher speed and throughput, including using fiber-optic technologies to improve performance. Source: Bloomberg
- Sep 15, 20265.5x their median
$META launched Meta One, a global subscription spanning Instagram, Facebook, WhatsApp and Meta AI. Plans start at $2.99/month for individual apps, with bundles up to $19.99 offering expanded AI and creator tools. Meta One has already reached 15M subscriptions and trials. https://t.co/lzC2XfiWxg
- Oct 6, 20264.6x their median
Google $GOOGL and Constellation $CEG signed a 20-year nuclear power deal to add 890 MW to the PJM grid through upgrades at 11 reactors, backed by $4.3B in investment. They also agreed to a 15-year supply deal covering another 2.7 GW, with the first uprate expected in 2028. https://t.co/J1cNw2kpod
- Oct 6, 20264.6x their median
NVIDIA is now worth $1 Trillion more than Apple. https://t.co/IoWzBUqeKk
- Oct 6, 20264.1x their median
$UBER TO ACQUIRE EZCATER FOR $2.3B IN CASH, EXPANDING UBER EATS INTO CATERING Uber is buying ezCater, a U.S. workplace meals and catering platform with 140,000+ restaurant partners and more than $2.5B in trailing 12-month gross bookings. ezCater is growing at a high-teens rate YoY, has average orders above $400, and is profitable on a non-GAAP operating income basis. Uber expects the deal to be margin accretive. After closing, ezCater will be integrated with Uber Eats and Uber for Business, giving Uber a larger presence in high-value group and enterprise food orders.
- Oct 7, 20263.7x their median
$SPCX SEEKS $40B TO FUND MASSIVE $NVDA CHIP PURCHASE: FT SpaceX is looking to raise about $40B in financing led by Apollo to fund purchases of Nvidia chips. The plan includes roughly $10B in bank loans and $30B in investment-grade debt, with the transaction expected to close in 2027. Elon Musk said in August that SpaceX had “decided to build exclusively on Nvidia,” specifically pointing to its Vera Rubin architecture, as the company ramps spending on AI and data-center infrastructure.
- Oct 6, 20263.5x their median
Micron $MU will pay Netlist a total of $600M, $30M a quarter from Q4 2026 to Q3 2031, under patent license and settlement deals that end all pending litigation between them.
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 149 interactions against 205K followers, an engagement rate of 0.074%. Measured over 82 original posts, its engagement rate beats 54% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 28K times each, and 0.533% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 13.6% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 82 posts sampled, 60% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.2K interactions, about 8.2x its own typical post.
- What is Wall St Engine's engagement rate on X?
- Wall St Engine (@wallstengine) has an engagement rate of 0.074%, based on the median interactions across 82 original posts from the last 30 days against 205,074 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.074%, Wall St Engine sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,152 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @wallstengine have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 54% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @wallstengine post?
- Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 4.03 posts per day across the measured window.