Back to @vvanedwards's profile

Vanessa Van Edwards engagement report

@vvanedwards - 48K followers on X

Measured over 11 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 22, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.05%
of 48K followers
Per impression
1.33%
1.8K views on a typical post
Reach
3.76%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
24
interactions (median)
Saved
0.222%
4 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.8/day
active 30% of days
Peak time
01:00 UTC
Thursday

A typical post picks up 24 interactions against 48K followers, an engagement rate of 0.05%. Measured over 11 original posts, its engagement rate beats 26% of 20,445 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 1.8K times each, and 1.33% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.75% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.8 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 11 posts sampled, 82% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 83 interactions, about 3.5x its own typical post.

Measured over 11 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 22, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Vanessa Van Edwards's engagement rate beats 26% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,445 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 4 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 39% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.05%, Vanessa Van Edwards sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,261 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,261 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 01:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 01:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 01:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video82% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 82% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 398 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 11, 20263.5x their median

    Steven Bartlett took a chance on me before he really had any reason to. He had me on Diary of a CEO before the following, before the keynotes, when I was a hopeful author with a dream. Fast forward to now, he picked up the UK publishing rights for Conversation, and what he probably didn’t know at the time was how that decision would end up changing my life. Going on Diary of a CEO the first time (of now many!) opened so many doors for me. It connected me to people, opportunities, and experiences that genuinely shifted the direction of my life. He has changed my life multiple times without even knowing it. So, Steven, thank you for taking a chance on me. You’ve had a much bigger impact on my life than you probably realize. Conversation out soon. This is just the beginning 🤍

    754402.7K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 20263.0x their median

    1/ There's a tell that shows up right before someone stops listening to you. Once you learn it, you'll see it at every event you go to for the rest of your life. There are three versions. https://t.co/ylen77r72M

    6452012K viewsView on X
  • Sep 5, 20262.5x their median

    One of the easiest ways to become more socially intelligent is also one of the most overlooked: If you think something nice about someone, say it. If you like their energy, tell them. If they're a great listener, tell them. If they handled a situation well, tell them. Most people walk around with positive thoughts they never share. They notice something admirable, interesting, or kind about another person and keep it to themselves. Socially intelligent people do the opposite. They make people feel seen. Not because they're trying to get something in return, but because they understand that relationships are built through small moments of connection. A genuine compliment can change the tone of an interaction, brighten someone's day, and make them remember you long after the conversation ends. So the next time you think something kind, don't keep it in your head. Say it. Want more tips like this? More information on People School here: https://t.co/FvgypuNs55

    508102.1K viewsView on X
  • Sep 3, 20262.4x their median

    Most people enter conversations focused on what they're going to say next. Instead, try entering with one goal: discover something you didn't know about the other person. Ask one more follow-up question. Stay curious a little longer. Some of the best stories, ideas, and connections are hidden just beneath the first answer. More information on where to find Conversation can be found here: https://t.co/8BDsTv7THs

    496202.8K viewsView on X
  • Oct 15, 20262.3x their median

    Finding out I'm a NYT Best Selling author. Still speechless. Thank you for helping me get there. https://t.co/6h59lkoXSJ

    4411001.8K viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 20262.3x their median

    Most people think social skills are about what to say. In reality, they're often about where you stand. Take a bar, for example. If you stand buried in the corner with your friends, you're telling the room, "We're closed for business." If you stand directly in the main traffic flow, everyone is too busy navigating around you to start a conversation. The sweet spot is near the edge of movement. Somewhere people naturally pass by, but can easily stop and chat without feeling trapped. The same principle applies to what I call the "bar exit strategy." One reason conversations feel awkward is because people accidentally corner themselves. They choose spots where leaving feels difficult, which makes them less likely to start conversations in the first place. When you know you can gracefully exit at any time, you become more relaxed, more approachable, and more willing to engage. Most social confidence isn't confidence at all. It's reducing friction. The best conversationalists know dozens of tiny social principles like these that make connecting with people feel effortless. Want more tips like this? Check out People School here: https://t.co/FvgypuNZUD

    476113.4K viewsView on X
  • Oct 3, 20262.1x their median

    My most important presentation tip: Your audience is going to forget a lot of your talk. Fast. But there's hope. Here's the research, and what I do about it 🧵

    425407.4K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 20262.0x their median

    Ranking body language cues because I have opinions about how you stand, sit, and make eye contact!! I've studied this for over 20 years and these are some of my favorites...and least favorites! But now I want to know: what are your favorite body language cues, or which ones are your absolute least favorite? 👀 #BodyLanguage #CommunicationTips #SocialSkills #Psychology #PeopleSkills

    434002.7K viewsView on X
  • Sep 15, 20261.8x their median

    Funny story about this picture. I was on stage doing my tech check, and my husband snapped this picture of me, clearly not happy with myself. But this is a SUPER important part of the presentation process. Prep is not glamorous, but it is essential for CONFIDENCE. I would go as far as to say that preparation is the door into confidence. A few unglamorous things I do to prep: Don’t worry about what I look like or how weird my facial expressions are. Do very loud, guttural vocal warm-ups. I try to do these in a private room, but if I have to do them around other people, I do it anyway because it really helps my voice. Practice out loud over and over again. Jump around and do a lymphatic flow movement session to get my body moving. Practice my slides backwards, just in case… No, not really. I don’t do that. But that could be fun! Avoid dairy. It gives me a weird sound in my throat. Bottom line: The secret to a great conversation or presentation? Preparation. The best communicators don’t just “wing it.” They think ahead, practice what they want to say, and prepare for the moments that matter. That’s exactly why I wrote Conversation: to help you feel more confident, prepared, and connected in the moments that matter most. You don’t have to hope you’ll know what to say. You can prepare for it. 💛

    390312.0K viewsView on X
  • Sep 7, 20261.8x their median

    Stop asking, "So, what do you do?" It's one of the fastest ways to send a conversation into autopilot. If you want more memorable conversations, swap out the default questions everyone asks for ones that actually reveal who someone is. A small change in what you ask can completely change where a conversation goes. What's your favorite question to ask? Info on where to find Conversation can be found here: https://t.co/8BDsTv7lRU

    374202.5K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 24 interactions against 48K followers, an engagement rate of 0.05%. Measured over 11 original posts, its engagement rate beats 26% of 20,445 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 1.8K times each, and 1.33% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.75% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.8 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 11 posts sampled, 82% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 83 interactions, about 3.5x its own typical post.

What is Vanessa Van Edwards's engagement rate on X?
Vanessa Van Edwards (@vvanedwards) has an engagement rate of 0.05%, based on the median interactions across 11 original posts from the last 30 days against 48,148 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.05%, Vanessa Van Edwards sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,261 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @vvanedwards have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 26% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,445 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @vvanedwards post?
Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.8 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going