Back to @voxdotcom's profile

Vox engagement report

@voxdotcom - 1.2M followers on X

Measured over 193 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 26, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom 10% for its size
Per follower
0.001%
of 1.2M followers
Per impression
0.069%
8.7K views on a typical post
Reach
0.74%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
6
interactions (median)
Saved
0.011%
1 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
7.77/day
active 100% of days
Peak time
10:00 UTC
Thursday

A typical post picks up 6 interactions against 1.2M followers, an engagement rate of 0.001%. Measured over 193 original posts, its engagement rate beats 7% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 8.7K times each, and 0.069% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.742% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 7.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 10:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 193 posts sampled, 26% carry an image or video, 5% are part of a thread and 78% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 480 interactions, about 80x its own typical post.

Measured over 193 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 26, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Vox's engagement rate beats 7% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 4% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.001%, Vox sits below the 10th percentile of the 205,374 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,374 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,897 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 10:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 10:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 10:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video26% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link78% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 26% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 78% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 156 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Oct 6, 202680x their median

    The decision to carry and raise a child can shape every part of a person’s financial life. @JessicaValenti joins Vox’s @AsteadWH to explain why abortion belongs in Democrats’ affordability message and what the party misses when it treats reproductive rights as a social issue. https://t.co/SaRxU1Ymz9

    497280144292K viewsView on X
  • Oct 20, 202620x their median

    Before she was incarcerated, former Theranos founder Elizabeth Holmes approached A24 about creating a documentary about her life. Nathan Fielder and Lance Oppenheim were given access to her life ahead of her jail time and created a film that had a shocking $15 million debut weekend at the box office last weekend. But despite its monetary success, did You Can See Everything give Holmes what she wanted? And exactly what is that, anyway?

    10098346K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 202619x their median

    The Lindsay Clancy trial reveals our failure on postpartum depression. Here's how it gets better. https://t.co/BegdAlBzi9

    628816186K viewsView on X
  • Sep 28, 202618x their median

    Cities spent decades banning cheap rooms for rent. Now a possible Supreme Court case and 'Golden Girls' bills are trying to bring them back. I wrote about who's behind the push, from conservative legal orgs to progressive YIMBYs and the @AARP. https://t.co/ZlnFJMjfm8

    82195242K viewsView on X
  • Oct 7, 202618x their median

    Is catch-and-release fishing just stabbing a bunch of fish in the mouth and throwing them back in the water, injured and vulnerable? @kennytorrella explains why what’s been marketed to Americans as a peaceful pastime is actually harmful to fish. https://t.co/A0G7i4ig57 https://t.co/Snbys3JTBb

    76236115K viewsView on X
  • Sep 15, 202617x their median

    Sydney Sweeney bares it all in a new advertisement for Novig, a sports betting company in which she has an equity stake. The ad has sparked intense backlash online, with people saying that Sweeney is sexualizing women’s sports. But, is this uproar intentional? The Cut news reporter Olivia Craighead explains how Sweeney likely knows exactly the controversies she’s causing.

    591330225K viewsView on X
  • Oct 10, 202617x their median

    In Wisconsin, Gov. Tony Evers’ late endorsement of David Crowley shook up the state’s Democratic primary for governor. Former Wisconsin gubernatorial candidate @FrancescaHongWI Francesca Hong talks to @asteadwh about how news of that endorsement impacted her and her campaign. https://t.co/U0qX7AIbFE

    8848225K viewsView on X
  • Sep 16, 202616x their median

    The implosion of Ed Sheeran’s ongoing world tour tells us something about shifting attitudes toward Israel. https://t.co/f1gnc5YVrv

    8585025K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 202615x their median

    An Islamophobic Congress member beat an antisemitic influencer. It may be a sign of the GOP to come. https://t.co/goDrbXYcy2

    62138535K viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 202614x their median

    Wild horses are an iconic fixture of the American West, yet every year the government rounds up thousands for adoption. But according to a recent New York Times investigation, some are sent to slaughter — a problem that's only getting worse under the Trump administration. @KennyTorrella explains why.

    51274219K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 6 interactions against 1.2M followers, an engagement rate of 0.001%. Measured over 193 original posts, its engagement rate beats 7% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 8.7K times each, and 0.069% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.742% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 7.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 10:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 193 posts sampled, 26% carry an image or video, 5% are part of a thread and 78% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 480 interactions, about 80x its own typical post.

What is Vox's engagement rate on X?
Vox (@voxdotcom) has an engagement rate of 0.001%, based on the median interactions across 193 original posts from the last 30 days against 1,174,212 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.001%, Vox sits below the 10th percentile of the 205,374 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @voxdotcom have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 7% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the bottom 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @voxdotcom post?
Most posts go out around 10:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 7.77 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going