Back to @vladimirgajic1's profile

Владимир М.Гајић engagement report

@vladimirgajic1 - 69K followers on X

Measured over 20 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 17, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.386%
of 69K followers
Per impression
1.47%
18K views on a typical post
Reach
26.3%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
266
interactions (median)
Saved
0.022%
4 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.23/day
active 60% of days
Peak time
06:00 UTC
Thursday

A typical post picks up 266 interactions against 69K followers, an engagement rate of 0.386%. Measured over 20 original posts, its engagement rate beats 73% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 18K times each, and 1.47% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 26.3% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.2 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 60% of days. Most posts go out around 06:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 20 posts sampled, 30% carry an image or video and 50% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 6.5K interactions, about 24x its own typical post.

Measured over 20 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 17, 2026. Recurring tag: #tiktok.

Compared with accounts its own size

Владимир М.Гајић's engagement rate beats 73% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 6 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 50% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.386%, Владимир М.Гајић sits above the 50th percentile of the 204,694 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.143% to 0.677%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.677%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,694 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,880 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.677%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 06:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 06:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 06:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video30% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link50% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 30% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 50% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 341 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 11, 202624x their median

    Rukometni savez Srbije postao Srpski rukometni savez. Vaterpolo savez Srbije postao Srpski vaterpolo savez. Bokserski savez Srbije posto Srpski bokserski savez. Republika Srbija je država srpskog naroda i SVIH građana koji žive u njoj. Mađari, Bošnjaci, Romi, Hrvati, Goranci, Albanci, Rusini, Slovaci, Bugari, Vlasi, Rusi, Ukrajinci, Rumuni, Makedonci i svi drugi, ovo su i VAŠI savezi. Kada ih pobedimo, pobedićemo i njihovu politiku 90ih. A pobedićemo ✊

    5.0K721465230428K viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 202611x their median

    Isländer stimmen gegen EU-Beitrittsverhandlungen https://t.co/78GdMNcA3b https://t.co/7Gy5ykRLQz

    2.1K1475176284K viewsView on X
  • Sep 3, 20269.3x their median

    Zamisli da je Hitler bio naš čo’ek, koliko li bi mu poštovalaca sad na grob dolazilo. Na grob zločincu odgovornom za genocid mogu samo oni koji bi sve to ponovili.

    2.1K1302084488K viewsView on X
  • Aug 20, 20262.3x their median

    STRAŠNO‼️ VUČIĆ ODLUČIO: „CELA ZEMLJA MOŽE BITI SPALJENA – ALI VATROGASNA FLOTA EVROPSKE UNIJE NEĆE LETETI NAD SRBIJOM – IAKO SRBIJA ZA TO FINANSIJSKI PLAĆA. UMESTO TOGA – POŽARE ĆE GASITI JEDAN PUTINOV AVION“‼️ Ovo je prevod odluke predsednika Srbije da ODBIJE aktiviranje postojećeg sporazuma Srbije sa Evropskom Unijom o pomoći u katastrofama i da umesto toga reklamira Putina u Srbiji. U Decembru 2022. Srbija i Evropska Unija zaključile su Sporazum o učešću Srbije u Mehanizmu civilne zaštite EU (Union Civil Protection Mechanism – UCPM). Sporazum je ratifikovan 2023 u Srbiji, Službeni glasnik RS broj MU 5/2023. Na osnovu ovog sporazuma: - Srbija plaća članarinu u UCPM - Zbog toga Srbija može U SVAKOM TRENUTKU da traži od EU da države članice pošalju flotu vatrogasnih aviona i helikoptera da gase požare u Srbiji. Ovo isto važi i za sve druge prirodne ili druge katastrofe. Umesto toga, iako građani Srbije plaćaju članarinu u UCPM Vučić NE DOZVOLJAVA Evropskoj Uniji da pomogne građanima Srbije u suzbijanju požara. EU ne može da šalje flotu aviona i helikoptera ako država ne zatraži takvu asistenciju – jer to je obeležje suvereniteta svake države. Da je Vučić postavio takav zahtev pre nedelju dana, Evropska Unija bi po ovom sporazumu već poslala svoju flotu i požar na Deliblatskoj peščari bi već bio ugašen! Umesto toga – imamo ekstremno stanje rizika od širenje požara na sela i gradove! Stvar je utoliko strašnija jer u gašenju požara u Deliblatskoj peščari se rizikuju ljudski životi vatrogasaca, rizikuje se velika privatna imovina. Vučiću to nije bitno – njemu je bitno da spreči svaki prikaz toga šta građani od EU mogu da dobiju. Evropska Unija je posle USA druga svetska sila po vatrogasnoj avio floti, sa stotinama avona i helikoptera (Rusija ima samo 22 takva aviona). Požar u Deliblatskoj pešćari se već približio gradu Beloj Crkvi. Umesto da Srbija traži asistenciju od EU i da EU odmah pošalje ono za šta građani Srbije već plaćaju - Vučić odlučuje da reklamira jedan Putinov bedni avion. Zašto Vučić ovo radi? Prvo – zato da bi i dalje stanovništvo Srbije izgrađivao kao pro-rusko i anti-zapadno, da bi time za dug niz godina sprečio ulazak Srbije u EU. Jer ako umesto flote aviona Evropske Unije požare u Srbiji gasi jedan bedni Putinov avion – građani to shvataju da je Rusija ta koja pomaže Srbiji a da EU to ne čini. Zato je vlada Srbije i prećutala da je uslov da Rusija pošalje avion taj da Srbija to najpre formalno zatraži. I Vučić je to Putinu formalno i zatražio (nakon što je Kremlj njemu rekao da to zatraži) – jer ovim Rusija dobija reklamu, koja joj je u ovim vremenima veoma potrebna. I Kremlj od ovoga već pravi snažnu propagandu i u Srbiji i van nje - kao deo hibridnih operacija Kremlja. Drugo – nakon što je Kremlj dozvolio Vučiću da pozove Zelenskog u posetu, i nakon što je Vučić dobio za to bizarne poene na Zapadu – Vučić sada može otvorenije da forsira ruske interese u Srbiji – jer poseta Zelenskog sada amnestira mnoge Vućićeve pro-ruske poteze. Vučićeva poruka građanima Srbije zapravo glasi: - „NEK SRBIJA BUDE SPALJENA AKO JE TO POTREBNO DA BIH JA MEĐUNARODNIM MANIPULACIJAMA SAČUVAO SVOJU VLAST!“ BEDNO‼️BEDNO‼️ BEDNO‼️ Bedno posebno zbog toga što Srbija zaista gori, i što ljudi zaista rizikuju svoje živote u borbi protiv ekstremno rizičnog požara, koji sada preti i privatnoj imovini hiljadama ljudi.

    4571222410117K viewsView on X
  • Jul 28, 20262.2x their median

    Јел стварно Албанци са КИМ верују да ће променом имена градовима и српским топонимима Косово постати њихово? Не помаже то комшије да постанете држава на српској територији. У току су глобалне промене које ће ваше наде да претворе у заблуде

    44553731022K viewsView on X
  • Sep 17, 20261.9x their median

    Значи ипак је Пајтић мастермајнд студентске листе.

    294371591934K viewsView on X
  • Aug 13, 20261.8x their median

    Дакле Покрет слободних грађана признаје државу Косово… https://t.co/niomNnQ6r7

    34859501215K viewsView on X
  • Aug 15, 2026

    Nikada Srbiji nisu bili problem neinformisani i siromašni penzioneri, seljaci i radnici. Problem su intelektualci koji su se prodali i koji ćute zbog sitnih ličnih interesa, problem su političari kojima su ideologija i mandati važniji od Srbije, problem su novinari koji svesno obmanjuju javnost, problem su policija, tužilaštvo i sudstvo koji štite kriminalce, problem su javne ličnosti iz sveta kulture i sporta koje su se slizale s režimom. Problem je što Srbija nema elitu.

    325441868.6K viewsView on X
  • Sep 10, 2026

    Најкомичније су ми ове изјаве о “ стављању свих ресурса СЛ”…који ресурси наравно не постоје.

    199231211023K viewsView on X
  • Sep 6, 2026

    Germany, 64.0% of the electoral districts counted: Saxony-Anhalt regional parliament election AfD (ESN): 47.2% (+26.4) CDU (EPP): 16.1% (-21.0) SPD (S&D): 8.5% (+0.1) GRÜNE (Greens/EFA): 8.4% (+2.5) LINKE (LEFT): 8.1% (-2.9) BSW (NI): 5.1% (new) FDP (RE): 2.5% (-3.9) FW (RE): 1.1% (-2.0) Tierschutz (LEFT): 1.1% (-0.3) Garten (*): 0.6% (-0.2) Tierallianz (*): 0.6% (+0.1) Volt (Greens/EFA): 0.3% (new) PARTEI (*): 0.3% (-0.4) PdF (RE): 0.2% (new) Basis (*): 0.1% (-1.4) +/- vs. Last election ➤ https://t.co/bueDvBc3AI

    26746162398K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#tiktok

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 266 interactions against 69K followers, an engagement rate of 0.386%. Measured over 20 original posts, its engagement rate beats 73% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 18K times each, and 1.47% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 26.3% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.2 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 60% of days. Most posts go out around 06:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 20 posts sampled, 30% carry an image or video and 50% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 6.5K interactions, about 24x its own typical post.

What is Владимир М.Гајић's engagement rate on X?
Владимир М.Гајић (@vladimirgajic1) has an engagement rate of 0.386%, based on the median interactions across 20 original posts from the last 30 days against 68,949 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.386%, Владимир М.Гајић sits above the 50th percentile of the 204,694 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @vladimirgajic1 have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 73% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @vladimirgajic1 post?
Most posts go out around 06:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.23 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going