Back to @vkhosla's profile

Vinod Khosla engagement report

@vkhosla - 767K followers on X

Measured over 16 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.017%
of 767K followers
Per impression
0.15%
86K views on a typical post
Reach
11.3%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
129
interactions (median)
Saved
0.066%
56 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
3.17/day
active 60% of days
Peak time
15:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 129 interactions against 767K followers, an engagement rate of 0.017%. Measured over 16 original posts, its engagement rate beats 40% of 3,809 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 86K times each, and 0.15% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 11.2% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 60% of days. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 16 posts sampled, 50% carry an image or video, 13% are part of a thread and 75% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2.2K interactions, about 17x its own typical post.

Measured over 16 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Vinod Khosla's engagement rate beats 40% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,809 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 12% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.017%, Vinod Khosla sits above the 25th percentile of the 36,960 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.012% to 0.08%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.08%
p750.435%
p902.10%
p99159.8%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 36,960 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 106,518 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.08%
75th percentile0.435%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile159.8%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 15:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 15:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 15:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%51K
01:00 UTC-2%52K
02:00 UTC-3%51K
03:00 UTC-4%54K
04:00 UTC-6%44K
05:00 UTC-4%42K
06:00 UTC-4%49K
07:00 UTC-5%53K
08:00 UTC-4%61K
09:00 UTC-3%70K
10:00 UTC-2%73K
11:00 UTC-3%79K
12:00 UTC-2%87K
13:00 UTC-2%96K
14:00 UTC-4%99K
15:00 UTC-2%102K
16:00 UTC-3%99K
17:00 UTC-2%92K
18:00 UTC-1%85K
19:00 UTC-2%80K
20:00 UTC-1%75K
21:00 UTC-1%67K
22:00 UTC-2%58K
23:00 UTC-1%52K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%233K
Monday0%292K
Tuesday-3%284K
Wednesday-1%253K
Thursday-2%246K
Friday-3%255K
Saturday+3%229K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Aug 27, 202617x their median

    One of the coolest logo's @Seahawks and fan brand "12's Everywhere" https://t.co/MfcQPo50Rd

    2.0K851071291K viewsView on X
  • Aug 12, 20264.9x their median

    AI has created a 21st-century hyperabundance of potential new drugs and biological hypotheses, but we are still using 18th-century style animal testing. Instead, @Vivodyne is evaluating drugs in living human tissues at industrial scale. Excited to continue working with Vivodyne as they iterate on their 'Virtual Human' data center, where we can predict treatment response.

    5145551950K viewsView on X
  • Aug 17, 20262.7x their median

    Game mostly over for human doctors vs. AI? @ZekeEmanuel @AbeBakerButler @nealkhosla and I just published in @JAMA_current. Some, like @Bob_Wachter, contend AI-only care will be medicine’s “economy class.” We disagree. In cognitive medical functions, AI alone medical care is likely to be better than physician-only or physician-AI hybrid care. @DrOz @1klomp time for @CMSGov @CMSinnovates to take note: Will Autonomous AI Exceed AI-Aided Physicians as the Best Medical Care? A thread: https://t.co/hme3AFVjnw

    199555138120K viewsView on X
  • Aug 6, 20262.0x their median

    Bold for @nyt to call Google an "AI also-ran." I am not sure I agree. I think it misses that there are many games to play in AI. And not everyone is playing the same game. Also, two months ago, people were calling OpenAI an "also-ran." But not now. If you think the AI horse race is months-long, not years-long, you are missing what's really happening.

    21418212109K viewsView on X
  • Aug 17, 20262.0x their median

    Game mostly over for human doctors vs. AI? @ZekeEmanuel @AbeBakerButler @nealkhosla and I just published in @JAMA_current: When AI alone performance is consistently superior to human-alone performance, AI alone surpasses human-AI hybrids. Paradoxically, hybrid care in which humans are in the loop to correct AI errors is likely to worsen rather than improve AI performance. Medicine is rapidly approaching the transition point at which AI alone will exceed physicians and physician-AI hybrids in providing the best care. @DrOz @1klomp time for @CMSGov @CMSinnovates to take note: Will Autonomous AI Exceed AI-Aided Physicians as the Best Medical Care? https://t.co/hme3AFVjnw

    16131431855K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 20261.7x their median

    Peace is possible. We're building it @Asymmlabs. We've raised $51M toward that goal. More announcements to come. https://t.co/qpR861duWa

    164102022161K viewsView on X
  • Aug 17, 2026

    1/ We started @CuraiHQ with the mission of proving AI could outperform humans at the core cognitive work of medicine. Today in @JAMA_Current, @ZekeEmanuel, @AbeBakerButler, @vkhosla, and I are publishing a comprehensive argument this future is here. https://t.co/bpXMdXljsw

    105194019109K viewsView on X
  • Aug 17, 2026

    Game mostly over for human doctors vs. AI? @ZekeEmanuel @AbeBakerButler @nealkhosla and I just published in @JAMA_current: AI-alone may provide better patient care than physicians or physician-controlled hybrids at 5 fundamental cognitive medical tasks is unsettling but seems probable. Even when AI alone is superior, significant barriers to implementation remain. Nonetheless, superior autonomous AI will likely be ready to be deployed for real-world cognitive medical tasks in some, maybe many, workflows by 2030. Consequently, physicians, policymakers, and others need to urgently devise approaches to workflow, liability, regulation, reimbursement, and medical education. @DrOz @1klomp time for @CMSGov @CMSinnovates to take note: Will Autonomous AI Exceed AI-Aided Physicians as the Best Medical Care? https://t.co/hme3AFVjnw

    7912261691K viewsView on X
  • Aug 5, 2026

    These guys just threw together a few slides and..... https://t.co/PYwWFoYMCB "With this team, I wouldn’t need to know what they were doing before I backed them,” says venture capitalist Vinod Khosla, who met with them in his Sand Hill Road office on a Saturday, so no one would get a hint of Google’s upcoming loss. “It’s the ultimate superstar team."

    1081412111K viewsView on X
  • Jul 26, 2026

    Solution from @glydways is far superior and much more broadly applicable than from @boringcompany. It is the solution globally that can reduce cars by 50% and be suprior for users than owning a car. Boring company is also a good idea but more niche. Investors should compare both. https://t.co/s8X5OW1Yzs

    843176318K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 129 interactions against 767K followers, an engagement rate of 0.017%. Measured over 16 original posts, its engagement rate beats 40% of 3,809 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 86K times each, and 0.15% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 11.2% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 60% of days. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 16 posts sampled, 50% carry an image or video, 13% are part of a thread and 75% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2.2K interactions, about 17x its own typical post.

What is Vinod Khosla's engagement rate on X?
Vinod Khosla (@vkhosla) has an engagement rate of 0.017%, based on the median interactions across 16 original posts from the last 30 days against 766,972 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.017%, Vinod Khosla sits above the 25th percentile of the 36,960 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @vkhosla have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 40% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,809 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @vkhosla post?
Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 3.17 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going