Back to @viktorbk's profile

Viktor Barth-Kron engagement report

@viktorbk - 186K followers on X

Measured over 67 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 15, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.236%
of 186K followers
Per impression
1.75%
25K views on a typical post
Reach
13.5%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
438
interactions (median)
Saved
0.02%
5 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
4.33/day
active 40% of days
Peak time
09:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 438 interactions against 186K followers, an engagement rate of 0.236%. Measured over 67 original posts, its engagement rate beats 74% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 25K times each, and 1.75% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 13.5% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 40% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 09:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 67 posts sampled, 28% carry an image or video, 16% are part of a thread and 42% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 3.7K interactions, about 8.4x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #expressen, #aktuellt, #politikrummet.

Measured over 67 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 15, 2026. Recurring tags: #expressen, #aktuellt, #politikrummet.

Compared with accounts its own size

Viktor Barth-Kron's engagement rate beats 74% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 59% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.236%, Viktor Barth-Kron sits above the 50th percentile of the 204,491 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.143% to 0.677%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.677%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,491 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,891 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.677%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 09:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 09:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 09:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video28% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link42% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 28% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 42% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 222 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 15, 20268.4x their median

    Imponerande att Tobias Baudin kan hÄlla sig för skratt nÀr han stÄr i tv och upprört anklagar nÄgot annat parti för att "klamra sig fast vid statsministerposten".

    3.4K26263656K viewsView on X
  • Oct 13, 20266.9x their median

    Varje gÄng Thomas Bodström stÄr och skrÀvlar vÀrldsfrÄnvÀnt i tv dör en bit av socialdemokratins förtroendekapital. #aktuellt

    2.8K17966551K viewsView on X
  • Oct 14, 20265.7x their median

    Det behövs faktiskt varken fördjupande poddar, lÄnga reportage eller ens statsvetenskaplig forskning för att förklara hur det blev som det blev efter valet. Lyssna pÄ 30 sekunder med Thomas Bodström i stÀllet. https://t.co/ALuCCyfdW5

    2.1K25112244172K viewsView on X
  • Oct 7, 20264.9x their median

    Undrar om den finns en enda centerpartist nÄgonstans i Sverige som tittade pÄ Aktuellt ikvÀll och kÀnde att fan, det hÀr hÄller, den hÀr debatten tar vi hem, det kommer sluta som vi vill.

    2.0K12259591K viewsView on X
  • Sep 16, 20264.8x their median

    Varför skulle en M–L–KD–C-regering med passivt stöd frĂ„n SD vara omöjlig för C? Med tunga ministerposter och politiska kompromisser som ger historiskt stora centerpartistiska avtryck? Och varför skulle passivt stöd frĂ„n SD vara en principiell omöjlighet, medan parlamentariskt stöd frĂ„n ett V som Ă€r marinerat i antisemitism, terrorromantik och extremism skulle vara acceptabelt? Om C:s princip Ă€r att ytterkantspartier inte ska ges inflytande mĂ„ste den rimligen gĂ€lla Ă„t bĂ„da hĂ„ll. Annars Ă€r det ingen princip, utan ett fikonlöv för en vĂ€nsterpolitik som C:s vĂ€ljare inte röstat för. Sluta med rökridĂ„erna och ge vĂ€ljarna ett besked: varför Ă€r stöd frĂ„n V acceptabelt, men stöd frĂ„n SD otĂ€nkbart?

    1.7K2381118107K viewsView on X
  • Oct 13, 20264.7x their median

    PÄ vÀstfronten intet nytt.

    1.9K5190391K viewsView on X
  • Sep 17, 20264.2x their median

    Byt plan om vi ska fĂ„ Magdalena Andersson vald, vill jag vĂ€dja om i all vĂ€lmening. Jag kommer dĂ€rför, i förebyggande syfte, gĂ„ igenom vad som inte kommer att funka för att pressa V. SĂ„ att vi kan hoppa över den fasen. BĂ€ttre att vara rak och tydlig. Jag kör inte med bullshit, det Ă€r inte min grej. 1. Det kommer inte att funka att lĂ„tsas som att V ska fĂ„ ”massa politik” istĂ€llet för regeringsinflytande. Sak och inflytande hĂ€nger ihop, och om det inte var sĂ„ varför vill dĂ„ samtliga övriga partier regera? C vill inte ha med V pga politiken, givetvis fĂ„r vi inte ”mer” om vi stĂ„r utanför. Vi gĂ„r inte pĂ„ den blĂ„sningen. 2. Det kommer inte att funka att förhandla bakom vĂ„ra ryggar och sedan lĂ„tsas att vi fĂ„tt nĂ„gra ”godbitar”. Alla ska vara med frĂ„n start och mĂ„lsĂ€ttningen ska vara uttalad, dvs vi fyra partier förhandla med sikte pĂ„ att bilda en fyrpartiregering. Att börja i fel ordning funkar inte, sakfrĂ„gor och innehĂ„ll förhandlas efter att vi Ă€r överens om mĂ„lsĂ€ttningen med förhandlingarna. 3. Det kommer inte att funka att S-tyckare med vĂ€nsterstĂ€mpel uttalar sig om hur V borde göra istĂ€llet, inte heller tidigare statsministrar eller andra frĂ€siga typer kommer att fĂ„ oss att slĂ€ppa kravet om likvĂ€rdigt inflytande. 4. Det kommer inte att funka att S-mĂ€rkta ledarsidor försöker sig pĂ„ karaktĂ€rsmord, pĂ„stĂ„r att det skulle vara V:s fel om SD fĂ„r inflytande ifall C gĂ„r över eller vĂ€grar vĂ€lja sida och det blir extraval. 5. Det kommer inte att funka att ledare inom LO ber oss att ”ta ett chill pill” alternativt vĂ€djar till oss att ”rösta igenom” en S,MP, C-regering för att dom har lovat att tex ta bort karensen. Men det finns en lösning! Det som kommer att funka Ă€r om alla partier som vill fĂ„ Magdalena Andersson vald accepterar varandra likvĂ€rdigt och tar konsekvenserna som kommer med valet av statsministerkandidat, det Ă€r bara möjligt om man ocksĂ„ sĂ€ger ja till hela underlaget. SĂ„ lĂ€gg krutet dĂ€r nu nĂ€r övriga drömmar om olika regeringskonstellationer gĂ„tt i kras. Det Ă€r bra om folk förstĂ„r V:s hĂ„llning. Alla behöver inte hĂ„lla med, men man ska Ă„tminstone ha hört hur V resonerar. Andra spinner frĂ€mst historier som istĂ€llet analytiker och tyckare levererar i poddar och TV-studios. Men V har inte en armĂ© av profiler som kan kliva fram och uttala sig, inte ett helt gĂ€ng anstĂ€llda som kan ”prata bakgrund” och inga stora ledarsidor som kan ta kampen för vĂ„r sak och sĂ€tta press pĂ„ andra. Nu spinner man intensivt för att fĂ„ V att vika ned oss. Ibland blir jag faktiskt orolig över att dom som spinner, börjar tro pĂ„ det dom sjĂ€lva sagt, nĂ€r deras narrativ sedan presenteras i analyser. DĂ€rför Ă€r det bra att ha fĂ„tt detta sagt. Jag blir förvĂ„nad över hur psykologiskt allt verkar ses. Experter som tror att V gĂ„r runt och kĂ€nner oss förorĂ€ttade över sjĂ€lva ”förnedringsklausulen” i januariavtalet. AlltsĂ„ att man skrev in en sĂ„n punkt fick mig redan dĂ„ nĂ€stan att skratta, för det var sĂ„ barnsligt. Problemet var ju för sjutton inte punkten utan att man inte hade egna mandat till nĂ„gra av alla dom överenskomna punkterna. Man regerade pĂ„ V-mandaten. SĂ„ kan man inte jobba! Vi har vĂ€ljare i vĂ„r egen rĂ€tt och som det ser ut 30 mandat. Huruvida vi ”litar pĂ„ S” eller inte Ă€r inte huvudskĂ€let till att vi vill vara med. Vi vill precis som alla andra partier ha inflytande över hela beslutsprocessen, inte svĂ„rare Ă€n sĂ„, varför ska just vi behöva förklara det 100 gĂ„nger. Det Ă€r ingen ”personlig” krĂ€nkning riktad mot S frĂ„n V, det handlar inte om gamla surdegar, utan om en politisk bedömning vi gjort tillsammans i vĂ„rt parti, och som vi varit hyggliga nog att berĂ€tta om i god tid. Inför vĂ„r kongress kampanjades det intensivt för att fĂ„ V att fatta ett annat beslut. Det funkade inte heller. För det handlar om politik, inte om psykologi och person, och V har det rimligaste kravet att alla som behövs ska ingĂ„. Dom som sĂ€ger nej till ett parti vars mandat man sjĂ€lv efterfrĂ„gar, mĂ„ste pressas till att sĂ€ga ja. DĂ„ kan vi gĂ„ framĂ„t.

    1.0K127521154865K viewsView on X
  • Oct 9, 20264.1x their median

    Om det ÀndÄ hade funnits utrymme att reflektera lite tidigare i processen. https://t.co/yZMyXR2oQJ

    1.6K10568746K viewsView on X
  • Sep 15, 20263.4x their median

    LRF-pressens motsvarighet till Viktor Barth-Kron, @ATL_Anders, sĂ€ger nĂ„gra sanningens ord. ”Elisabeth Thand Ringqvist kan lösa upp knutarna med valresultatet om hon bara vĂ€ljer förhandlingsbordet i stĂ€llet för barnbordet.” https://t.co/QTHMMDcwYv

    1.3K1961710118K viewsView on X
  • Sep 15, 20263.0x their median

    Ulf Kristersson har förlorat valet, slog centerpartisten fast. C vill dĂ€rför inleda samtal med Socialdemokraterna om att bilda regering ”i mitten”. Stopp, stopp, stopp, som Magdalena Andersson brukar sĂ€ga nĂ€r hon Ă€r missnöjd med journalisters frĂ„gor. https://t.co/NxxXTFOwPE

    1.2K9851046K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#expressen#aktuellt#politikrummet#svpol

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 438 interactions against 186K followers, an engagement rate of 0.236%. Measured over 67 original posts, its engagement rate beats 74% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 25K times each, and 1.75% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 13.5% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 40% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 09:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 67 posts sampled, 28% carry an image or video, 16% are part of a thread and 42% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 3.7K interactions, about 8.4x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #expressen, #aktuellt, #politikrummet.

What is Viktor Barth-Kron's engagement rate on X?
Viktor Barth-Kron (@viktorbk) has an engagement rate of 0.236%, based on the median interactions across 67 original posts from the last 30 days against 185,809 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.236%, Viktor Barth-Kron sits above the 50th percentile of the 204,491 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @viktorbk have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 74% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @viktorbk post?
Most posts go out around 09:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 4.33 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going