Vera Lengsfeld engagement report
@vera_lengsfeld - 73K followers on X
Measured over 11 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 13, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 928 interactions against 73K followers, an engagement rate of 1.27%. Measured over 11 original posts, its engagement rate beats 90% of 19,933 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 9.9K times each, and 9.36% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 13.5% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 57% of days. Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 11 posts sampled, 45% carry an image or video and 55% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 14K interactions, about 15x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #afd, #sachsenanhalt, #maischberger.
Measured over 11 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 13, 2026. Recurring tags: #afd, #sachsenanhalt, #maischberger.
Compared with accounts its own size
Vera Lengsfeld's engagement rate beats 90% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (19,933 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 6 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 95% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 1.27%, Vera Lengsfeld sits above the 75th percentile of the 199,840 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 25% band, which runs 0.669% to 2.53%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.141% |
| 75th percentile | 0.669% |
| 90th percentile | 2.53% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 08:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 45% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 55% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | +15% | +14% to +16% | 32K |
- 45% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 55% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
- Its average post runs 417 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Sep 6, 202615x their median
💸💰🤑💶💷💵 Former head of the Ukrainian anti-corruption office: Zelenskyy owns 6 properties in Spain, 14 in the UK, 21 in France, 8 in Italy, and 34 in the United Arab Emirates. Here are his European euros. https://t.co/2V5BIsRWLJ
- Jan 5, 20234.4x their median
Man kann es drehen und wenden wie man will: Deutlicher als in der #Coronazeit hat sich noch kein deutscher Staat und seine angeblichen Verfassungsschützer so dermaßen delegitimiert. Und das konnte jeder sehen, der hingeschaut hat. https://t.co/DH0v4C2m1E
- Sep 7, 20262.0x their median
Selbst die OECD gibt inzwischen zu: "Die Energiewende wird ohne Kernkraft finanziell untragbar". Und die stillgelegten Kernkraftwerke kann man - laut ihrer Studie - wieder anstellen. Werden die Altparteien dementsprechend handeln? https://t.co/AT5CUiVpRn
- Sep 8, 20261.8x their median
Der Wahlbetrug war in der DDR mit den 99-Prozent Ergebnissen noch offenkundig. Heute hingegen werden die Bürger mit abweichenden Urnenwahlen und subtilen Abweichungen bei den Stimmbezirken hinter die Fichte geführt. https://t.co/Zg1EUZ2UiY
- Sep 5, 2026
Ich spreche jetzt niemanden persönlich an, um keinen Ärger von der Staatsanwaltschaft zu bekommen. Aber was "die Union" hier macht, ist an *Ar*chlochhaftigkeit* wirklich nicht zu überbieten. Wir wissen alle: Es ist gerade Wahlkampf und für die verkommenste CDU/CSU nach Angela Merkel sieht es nicht gut aus. Und wenn man sein Hirn von Feigheit hat wegfressen lassen, sein Portemonnaie prall hat füllen lassen und sich, sobald man wieder hinter verschlossenen Türen ist, über die Blödheit des Wahlvolks totlacht, dann kommt man auf derartige "Pläne". Wird schon keiner merken, dass "die Union" seit 11 Jahren für den Kladderadatsch nicht nur verantwortlich ist, sie hat ihn sehenden Auges eingeleitet und dann mit einer fast faschistoid zu nennenden Brachialität im politisch-medialen Raum exekutiert. Das zum einen. Zum anderen aber war es "die Union", die man sicherlich gar nicht eine verbrecherische Organisation nennen darf, ohne eben von der Staatsanwaltschaft Post zu bekommen, die seit 2015 eine so widerwärtige Kampagne gegen wirklich alle Bürger gefahren hat, die in den schwarzen Antifa-Chor von Hosianna und *no borders, no nations* nicht einstimmen wollten. Es war "die Union", die diesen Bürgern nicht nur die Staatsanwaltschaft, sondern die aggressivsten und verblödetsten aus dem Teich der Antifa auf den Hals gehetzt hat. Es war "die Union", die mit dem Steuergeld der Bürger HateAid, Correctiv, Faktenchecker und wie diese Selbstzerstörungsprogramme alle noch so heißen, erst ermöglicht hat - um eben diese Bürger in Schach zu halten und zu drangsalieren. Nur: die, die das zerstörerische Lügenlied nicht mitsingen wollten, waren mal Wähler der "Union". Und das merkt "die Union" jetzt und bekommt Panik, was sich in solchen "Plänen" dann ausdrückt. Drittens aber, und das ist der entscheidende Punkt: Es war "die Union", die gegen die "fundamentalen Werte" Deutschlands verstoßen hat. Denn wieviele zusammengetretene Juden, wieviele geschändete Altare, wieviele massenvergewaltigte Frauen, wieviele abgeschlachtete Bürger muss es erst geben, um mit einer derartigen Dreistigkeit etwas so Selbstverständliches zu "fordern"? Jeder mit halbwegs Verstand wusste, dass ohne eine sofortige Abschiebung von Verbrechern dieses Land vor die Hunde gehen wird. Und das wusste jeder schon 2015. Warum hat "die Union" ganze elf Jahre gewartet, um nun mit gespielter Überraschung zu bemerken, dass "fundamentale Werte" in Gefahr sind und nur dieser läppische "Plan" sie noch retten kann? Fackeln und Mistgabeln wären noch zu werthaltig im Einsatz gegen diese "Union". Besser noch: es soll sie der Blitz beim Scheißen treffen!
- Sep 1, 2026
Mit Blick auf Sachsen-Anhalt sagt @ulfposh: In einer Demokratie müsse man den Wählerwillen akzeptieren – auch wenn einem das Wahlergebnis nicht gefalle. Die Menschen würden die #AfD unter anderem aus Unzufriedenheit mit der bisherigen #Migrationspolitik wählen. #maischberger https://t.co/XujYSujW04
- Aug 28, 2026
Kann das wahr sein? https://t.co/FETvxKucjq
- Sep 3, 2026
🔥 Das grösste Problem unsere Zeit? 😎 #UlrichSiegmund: Tankquittung 🎯 Sven Schulze: Hilflos. #SachsenAnhalt #AfD https://t.co/Y5o6b92sPM
- Sep 4, 2026
Die Bundesnetzagentur bereitet sich auf die Dunkelflaute vor: große Stromverbraucher sollen zentral erfasst und bei Bedarf zu Abschaltungen verpflichtet werden. https://t.co/x3IFODE95j
- Aug 28, 2026
Wenn man sagt, die Juden und die Radfahrer seien an allem schuld, fragen die Linken leider allzu oft "wieso denn die Radfahrer?" https://t.co/wwagoVyv7e
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 928 interactions against 73K followers, an engagement rate of 1.27%. Measured over 11 original posts, its engagement rate beats 90% of 19,933 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 9.9K times each, and 9.36% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 13.5% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 57% of days. Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 11 posts sampled, 45% carry an image or video and 55% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 14K interactions, about 15x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #afd, #sachsenanhalt, #maischberger.
- What is Vera Lengsfeld's engagement rate on X?
- Vera Lengsfeld (@vera_lengsfeld) has an engagement rate of 1.27%, based on the median interactions across 11 original posts from the last 30 days against 73,192 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 1.27%, Vera Lengsfeld sits above the 75th percentile of the 199,840 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @vera_lengsfeld have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 90% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (19,933 accounts), which puts it in the top 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @vera_lengsfeld post?
- Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.17 posts per day across the measured window.