Back to @venturetwins's profile

Justine Moore engagement report

@venturetwins - 249K followers on X

Measured over 47 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 27, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.184%
of 249K followers
Per impression
1.06%
43K views on a typical post
Reach
17.4%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
450
interactions (median)
Saved
0.145%
62 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
3.3/day
active 93% of days
Peak time
03:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 450 interactions against 249K followers, an engagement rate of 0.184%. Measured over 47 original posts, its engagement rate beats 70% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 43K times each, and 1.06% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 17.1% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 03:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 47 posts sampled, 83% carry an image or video and 15% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 75K interactions, about 166x its own typical post.

Measured over 47 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 27, 2026. Recurring tag: #metaconnect.

Compared with accounts its own size

Justine Moore's engagement rate beats 70% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 44% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.184%, Justine Moore sits above the 50th percentile of the 213,098 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.147% to 0.698%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.147%
p750.698%
p902.61%
p9982.9%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 213,098 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,393 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.147%
75th percentile0.698%
90th percentile2.61%
99th percentile82.9%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 03:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 03:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 03:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video83% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 83% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 209 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 26, 2026166x their median

    Marketing my cat like a new Apple product https://t.co/6S5y7mWzOu

    67K7.5K2762451.3M viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 202679x their median

    OpenAI: “We’ve solved math” Anthropic: “Our AI is so powerful it’s going to kill you” Google: “Introducing Gemini 3.9 Flash! It’s 30% faster and 15% worse than the last Gemini”

    34K1.2K3591291000K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 202659x their median

    Ngl I appreciate the strategy of hallucinating back at the AI interviewer https://t.co/QGmzWfpc5y

    25K1.5K1802192.7M viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 202639x their median

    Anthropic employees https://t.co/iYsrgeDDXN

    16K1.3K8363348K viewsView on X
  • Sep 15, 202619x their median

    GPT-6 Astra had gotten further than any AI system had ever gone in Minecraft. It was able to set up a semi-automatic blaze farm, allowing it to collect 6 blaze rods. It then located a warped forest, where it killed 6+ endermen and collected 3 pearls. As thousands of viewers watched the stream, Astra put all of its valuable items in a chest. Then a creeper showed up and blew up both the chest and Astra’s bed, wiping out all of its progress. Astra seemed to get extremely frustrated after this happened. Astra said to itself, "ALWAYS CARRY CRITICALITEMS withkeepInventory; don'tstoreinunguardedchesteveragain."

    7.9K498129192975K viewsView on X
  • Sep 6, 202616x their median

    Using GPT-6 Astra Max to make my wedding website https://t.co/2bTQX8HUb4

    7.1K2158719389K viewsView on X
  • Sep 5, 202613x their median

    My entire feed today https://t.co/hRbppfu79s

    5.4K2035910125K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 202612x their median

    We’re getting fully AI-generated police procedurals now. This is the first ep of Dick Snifford, Miami’s most unconventional detective. (made by logicbent on IG) https://t.co/TsLoOhi7d7

    4.6K364230961.0M viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 20268.9x their median

    I’m obsessed with this alternative Spiderman (from krem0vv on IG) https://t.co/Ntd9K9Rm5r

    3.5K3459557338K viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 20268.0x their median

    Discovered this new series from a French director experimenting with AI video. It’s called “La Nona Gigante” - and it’s about a boy who spends the summer with his grandma, who is the last living giant on her island. Not hard to see this as a full movie…made by leo_cannone. https://t.co/PaOln10fxI

    3.2K23410931222K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#metaconnect

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 450 interactions against 249K followers, an engagement rate of 0.184%. Measured over 47 original posts, its engagement rate beats 70% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 43K times each, and 1.06% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 17.1% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 03:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 47 posts sampled, 83% carry an image or video and 15% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 75K interactions, about 166x its own typical post.

What is Justine Moore's engagement rate on X?
Justine Moore (@venturetwins) has an engagement rate of 0.184%, based on the median interactions across 47 original posts from the last 30 days against 248,861 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.184%, Justine Moore sits above the 50th percentile of the 213,098 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @venturetwins have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 70% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @venturetwins post?
Most posts go out around 03:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 3.3 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going