Back to @venofn's profile

XSET Veno engagement report

@venofn - 302K followers on X

Measured over 26 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 19, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.522%
of 302K followers
Per impression
2.21%
71K views on a typical post
Reach
23.6%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
1.6K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.044%
32 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.23/day
active 63% of days
Peak time
11:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 1.6K interactions against 302K followers, an engagement rate of 0.522%. Measured over 26 original posts, its engagement rate beats 86% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 71K times each, and 2.21% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 23.5% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.2 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 63% of days. Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 26 posts sampled, 38% carry an image or video, 8% are part of a thread and 23% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 8.0K interactions, about 5.1x its own typical post.

Measured over 26 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 19, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

XSET Veno's engagement rate beats 86% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 66% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.522%, XSET Veno sits above the 50th percentile of the 204,491 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.143% to 0.677%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.677%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,491 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,891 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.677%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 11:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 11:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 11:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video38% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link23% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 38% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 23% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 97 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 28, 20265.1x their median

    LFT eu/na fragger only

    7.7K671680341K viewsView on X
  • Sep 27, 20264.9x their median

    don’t wanna cope I’ll say how I saw things (in depth explanation) Day 1, my gameplay just didn’t work and my backup gameplan didn’t work either and my shockwaves were terrible and Ajerss was getting hit too much midgame and we were playing edge to edge 100 above and getting max pull-backs and the zones after was all max too, so with all those things it was impossible to play. I figured out how to play after first 3 games (we had to just fight people for surge and try stay ahead if we could very hard from north battlewood it’s not as good as you think it is , we were wiping teams day 1 but my igling/shockwaves just wasn’t good enough) because there’s so much loot on the map I had teams infront of me playing 12 chests 1:20 into the game and just sat holding me with nothing in their inventory (khanada and oce mid-map team made my exit impossible along with swizzy tanking, I was full caged in my poi) Day 2, I made the right adjustments came up with the best way to key these teams changing my loot route to be quicker and get less loot with a different exit. My igling was a lot better and it felt like both days I couldn’t lose a fight. It was really comebackable but just didn’t play well as a duo. This meta is honestly impossible to play and that’s why the leaderboard was so allover the place, I really hope Fortnite thinks before they add stuff with this surge, the weapon pool, movement and map terrain/how many chests there are (too much dependency on zone rng) With that being said LFT as fragger/support

    7.3K11622913426K viewsView on X
  • Jan 23, 20264.6x their median

    Happy Birthday Dad https://t.co/tQ2lvjCpUm

    6.8K933355317K viewsView on X
  • Oct 1, 20264.4x their median

    BACK HOME FOR SOLOS https://t.co/q9UohNNFmG

    6.8K92784157K viewsView on X
  • Oct 2, 20263.1x their median

    EU SOLOS https://t.co/QCB2gznxp7

    4.8K54603108K viewsView on X
  • Oct 3, 20262.8x their median

    me + @FoCuSFNBR need 1 to fill remainder of trio cups

    4.1K401993194K viewsView on X
  • Sep 6, 20262.6x their median

    suing exitlag got logged out at first moving 70ping :D 3000$ https://t.co/PlzncjHB8N

    3.9K531083167K viewsView on X
  • Aug 15, 20262.4x their median

    3rd (16,000$) posting on yt - failure. https://t.co/tfefAD9lBW

    3.7K53830118K viewsView on X
  • Sep 25, 20262.3x their median

    https://t.co/GG0tCYJ5s8

    3.4K1091214109K viewsView on X
  • Sep 29, 20262.2x their median

    Cambridge 🇬🇧 https://t.co/2o4qtB5fmI

    3.5K3235089K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 1.6K interactions against 302K followers, an engagement rate of 0.522%. Measured over 26 original posts, its engagement rate beats 86% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 71K times each, and 2.21% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 23.5% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.2 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 63% of days. Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 26 posts sampled, 38% carry an image or video, 8% are part of a thread and 23% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 8.0K interactions, about 5.1x its own typical post.

What is XSET Veno's engagement rate on X?
XSET Veno (@venofn) has an engagement rate of 0.522%, based on the median interactions across 26 original posts from the last 30 days against 302,083 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.522%, XSET Veno sits above the 50th percentile of the 204,491 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @venofn have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 86% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @venofn post?
Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.23 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going