Back to @vanita_bariya's profile

Talati Cum Mantri engagement report

@vanita_bariya - 74K followers on X

Measured over 31 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 24, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.35%
of 74K followers
Per impression
3.58%
7.3K views on a typical post
Reach
9.78%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
260
interactions (median)
Saved
0.083%
6 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.03/day
active 100% of days
Peak time
01:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 260 interactions against 74K followers, an engagement rate of 0.35%. Measured over 31 original posts, its engagement rate beats 71% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 7.3K times each, and 3.58% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 9.78% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 413 interactions, about 1.6x its own typical post.

Measured over 31 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 24, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Talati Cum Mantri's engagement rate beats 71% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 6 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 77% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.35%, Talati Cum Mantri sits above the 50th percentile of the 204,798 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.143% to 0.678%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,798 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,879 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 01:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 01:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 01:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video3% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 3% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 127 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 30, 20261.6x their median

    เชฒเซ‹เช•เซ‹เชจเซ€ เชธเซ‡เชตเชพ เชฎเชพเชŸเซ‡, เชฒเซ‹เช•เซ‹เชจเซ€ เชตเชšเซเชšเซ‡ ๐Ÿคโค๏ธ เชธเซ‡เชตเชพ เช เชœ เชธเช‚เช•เชฒเซเชช, เชœเชจเชนเชฟเชค เช เชœ เชงเซเชฏเซ‡เชฏ. ๐Ÿ™๐Ÿšฉ https://t.co/X7Z1LkT1mc

    3521936617K viewsView on X
  • Aug 6, 2026

    เชœเซ‡เชฎ เชญเซ‹เชœเชจ เชชเซ‚เชฐเซเช‚ เชฅเชพเชฏ เช›เซ‡ เชคเซเชฏเชพเชฐเซ‡ เชฅเชพเชณเซ€ เช—เช‚เชฆเซ€ เชฆเซ‡เช–เชพเชฏ เช›เซ‡ เชคเซ‡เชตเซ€ เชœ เชฐเซ€เชคเซ‡ เชœเซเชฏเชพเชฐเซ‡ เชฒเซ‹เช•เซ‹ เชจเซ‹ เชฎเชคเชฒเชฌ เชชเซ‚เชฐเซ‹ เชฅเชˆ เชœเชพเชฏ เช›เซ‡ เชคเซเชฏเชพเชฐเซ‡ เชคเซ‡เชฎเชจเซ‡ เชซเช•เซเชค เชคเชฎเชพเชฐเซ€ เช…เช‚เชฆเชฐ เช–เชพเชฎเซ€เช“ เชœ เชฆเซ‡เช–เชพเชฏ เช›เซ‡..!!

    2852755850K viewsView on X
  • Sep 23, 2026

    เชถเซเชฐเซ‡เชฏ เชฎเชณเซ‡ เช•เซ‡ เชจ เชฎเชณเซ‡, เชชเซ‹เชคเชพเชจเซเช‚ เชถเซเชฐเซ‡เชทเซเช  เชชเซเชฐเชฆเชฐเซเชถเชจ เช†เชชเชตเชพเชจเซเช‚ เช•เซเชฏเชพเชฐเซ‡เชฏ เชฌเช‚เชง เชจ เช•เชฐเซ‹..!!

    280232757.8K viewsView on X
  • Oct 18, 2026

    เชตเชนเซ‡เชฒเชพ เช‰เช เชตเซเช‚ เชนเช‚เชฎเซ‡เชถเชพ เชซเชพเชฏเชฆเชพเช•เชพเชฐเช• เช›เซ‡,เชญเชฒเซ‡ เชคเซ‡ เชŠเช‚เช˜เชฎเชพเช‚เชฅเซ€ เชนเซ‹เชฏ,เชญเซเชฐเชฎเชฎเชพเช‚เชฅเซ€ เชนเซ‹เชฏ,เช•เซ‡ เช…เชนเช‚เช•เชพเชฐเชฎเชพเช‚เชฅเซ€ เชนเซ‹เชฏ เชธเชฎเชฏ เช•เชฟเช‚เชฎเชคเซ€ เช›เซ‡ เชœเซ‡ เชฒเซ‹เช•เซ‹ เชตเชนเซ‡เชฒเชพ เช‰เช เซ‡ เช›เซ‡ เชคเซ‡เชฎเชจเซ‡ เชœ เชคเซ‡ เชฎเชณเซ‡ เช›เซ‡..!!

    277192639.3K viewsView on X
  • Aug 10, 2026

    เชฎเชจเชจเซ€ เชถเชพเช‚เชคเชฟ เช›เซ€เชจเชตเซ€ เชฒเซ‡เชคเซ€ เช•เซ‹เชˆเชชเชฃ เชตเชธเซเชคเซเชจเซ‡ เช›เซ‹เชกเซ€ เชฆเซ‡เชตเซ€ เช เชธเชฎเชœเชฆเชพเชฐเซ€ เช›เซ‡, เชชเช›เซ€ เชญเชฒเซ‡ เชคเซ‡ เช†เชฆเชค เชนเซ‹เชฏ, เชตเชฟเชšเชพเชฐ เชนเซ‹เชฏ เช•เซ‡ เชธเช‚เชฌเช‚เชง เชนเซ‹เชฏ..!!

    2512939638K viewsView on X
  • Oct 3, 2026

    เชœเซ‡ เชตเซเชฏเช•เซเชคเชฟ เชงเซ€เชฐเชœ เชฐเชพเช–เซ‡ เช›เซ‡ เชคเซ‡เชจเชพเชฎเชพเช‚ เชนเชพเชฐ เชฎเชพเชŸเซ‡ เช•เซ‹เชˆ เชœเช—เซเชฏเชพ เชจเชฅเซ€ เช•เชพเชฐเชฃ เช•เซ‡ เชคเซ‡ เชœเชพเชฃเซ‡ เช›เซ‡ เช•เซ‡ เชฆเชฐเซ‡เช• เช…เช‚เชงเชพเชฐเซ€ เชฐเชพเชค เชชเช›เซ€, เชนเช‚เชฎเซ‡เชถเชพ เชชเซเชฐเช•เชพเชถ เชนเซ‹เชฏ เช›เซ‡..!!

    2592132521K viewsView on X
  • Sep 28, 2026

    เชงเชฐเซเชฎ เช•เชฐเชคเชพ เช•เชฐเซเชฎ เชšเชกเซ€เชฏเชพเชคเซ‹ เช›เซ‡.เช•เชพเชฐเชฃ เช•เซ‡ เชงเชฐเซเชฎ เช•เชฐเซ€เชจเซ‡ เชญเช—เชตเชพเชจ เชชเชพเชธเซ‡ เชฎเชพเช‚เช—เชตเซเช‚ เชชเชกเซ‡ เช›เซ‡, เชœเซเชฏเชพเชฐเซ‡ เช•เชฐเซเชฎ เช•เชฐเซ‹ เชเชŸเชฒเซ‡ เชญเช—เชตเชพเชจเชจเซ‡ เช†เชชเชตเซเช‚ เชœ เชชเชกเซ‡ เช›เซ‡..!!

    2482637610K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 2026

    เชชเชฅเซเชฅเชฐเชฎเชพเช‚ เชชเชฃ เชญเช—เชตเชพเชจ เช›เซ‡ เช เชตเชพเชค เชธเชฎเชœเชพเชตเชตเชฎเชพเช‚ เชงเชฐเซเชฎ เชธเชซเชณ เชฐเชนเซเชฏเซ‹ เชชเชฃ เชฎเชพเชฃเชธเชฎเชพเช‚ เชญเช—เชตเชพเชจ เช›เซ‡ เช เชธเชฎเชœเชพเชตเชตเชฎเชพเช‚ เชงเชฐเซเชฎ เช†เชœเซ‡ เชชเชฃ เช…เชธเชซเชณ เช›เซ‡, เชธเชฎเชœเชพเชฏ เชเชจเซ‡ เชตเช‚เชฆเชจ..!!

    2631827316K viewsView on X
  • Aug 11, 2026

    เชธเชฎเชฏ เช เชฎเชจเซ‡ เชถเซ€เช–เชตเซเชฏเซเช‚ เช›เซ‡ เช•เซ‡ เชฎเซŒเชจ เชตเชงเซ เชธเชพเชฐเซเช‚ เช›เซ‡, เช•เชพเชฐเชฃ เช•เซ‡ เช…เชนเซ€เช‚ เชธเชฎเชœเชจเชพเชฐเชพ เช“เช›เชพ เช›เซ‡, เช…เชจเซ‡ เชคเชฎเชพเชถเซ‹ เชฌเชจเชพเชตเชจเชพเชฐเชพ เชตเชงเซ เช›เซ‡..!!

    2313137747K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 2026

    เชœเซ‹ เชญเช—เชตเชพเชจ เชชเชพเชธเซ‡ เช•เช‚เชˆ เชฎเชพเช‚เช—เชตเซเช‚ เชนเซ‹เชฏ เชจเซ‡ เชคเซ‹ เชชเชฐเชฟเชตเชพเชฐเชจเซ€ เชเช•เชคเชพ เช…เชจเซ‡ เช–เซเชถเซ€ เชฎเชพเช‚เช—เชœเซ‹ เชธเชพเชนเซ‡เชฌ เช•เชพเชฐเชฃ เช•เซ‡ เชฎเช‚เชฆเชฟเชฐเชจเซ€ เชฌเชนเชพเชฐ เช—เชฐเซ€เชฌเซ‹เชจเชพ เชชเชฐเชฟเชตเชพเชฐเชจเซ‡ เชธเชพเชฅเซ‡ เชนเชธเชคเชพ เชœเซ‹เชฏเชพ เช›เซ‡ เช…เชจเซ‡ เช…เชฎเซ€เชฐเซ‹เชจเซ‡ เชชเชฐเชฟเชตเชพเชฐ เชตเช—เชฐ เชฎเช‚เชฆเชฟเชฐเชจเซ€ เช…เช‚เชฆเชฐ เชฐเชกเชคเชพ เชœเซ‹เชฏเชพ เช›เซ‡..!!

    2541628713K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 260 interactions against 74K followers, an engagement rate of 0.35%. Measured over 31 original posts, its engagement rate beats 71% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 7.3K times each, and 3.58% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 9.78% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 413 interactions, about 1.6x its own typical post.

What is Talati Cum Mantri's engagement rate on X?
Talati Cum Mantri (@vanita_bariya) has an engagement rate of 0.35%, based on the median interactions across 31 original posts from the last 30 days against 74,264 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.35%, Talati Cum Mantri sits above the 50th percentile of the 204,798 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @vanita_bariya have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 71% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @vanita_bariya post?
Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.03 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going