Back to @vaiencechannel's profile

VAIENCE バイエンス engagement report

@vaiencechannel - 292K followers on X

Measured over 10 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 6, 2026.

Engagement

Top 10% for its size
Per follower
2.07%
of 292K followers
Per impression
3.01%
201K views on a typical post
Reach
68.6%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
6.0K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.135%
271 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.73/day
active 37% of days
Peak time
10:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 6.0K interactions against 292K followers, an engagement rate of 2.07%. Measured over 10 original posts, its engagement rate beats 97% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 201K times each, and 3.01% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 68.6% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.73 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 37% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 10:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 10 posts sampled, 90% carry an image or video, 50% are part of a thread and 20% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 31K interactions, about 5.1x its own typical post.

Measured over 10 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 6, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

VAIENCE バイエンス's engagement rate beats 97% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 77% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 2.07%, VAIENCE バイエンス sits above the 75th percentile of the 66,258 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 25% band, which runs 0.499% to 2.09%.

p100.002%
p250.016%
p50 (median)0.1%
p750.499%
p902.09%
p99119.6%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 66,258 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 56,968 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.016%
50th percentile0.1%
75th percentile0.499%
90th percentile2.09%
99th percentile119.6%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 10:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 10:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 10:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video90% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link20% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 90% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 20% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 90 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 14, 20265.1x their median

    宇宙から撮影された富士山 https://t.co/awDhFWh73L

    29K1.2K1031251.4M viewsView on X
  • May 20, 20264.1x their median

    【左】1972年に撮影された地球(アポロ17号) 【右】2026年に撮影された地球(アルテミスⅡ) https://t.co/7ms7igpKeE

    23K1.1K5513186.6M viewsView on X
  • Aug 9, 20262.4x their median

    宇宙から撮影された日本 https://t.co/eqSazCNSsP

    13K828136196732K viewsView on X
  • Aug 16, 20262.2x their median

    100万匹以上の顔ダニが、あなたが夜眠っている間に毛穴から這い出して交尾をしています。毎晩あなたの顔の上でダニパーティーが開かれているわけですが、あなたはそのパーティーに招かれていません。

    12K82087220901K viewsView on X
  • Aug 12, 20261.9x their median

    ハッブル宇宙望遠鏡によって撮影された木星のオーロラ https://t.co/e0LyvPyUJt

    11K1.1K3849271K viewsView on X
  • Aug 10, 2026

    カッシーニが最後に撮影した土星の全景画像 https://t.co/fzSnHtyl2E

    7.8K9702858246K viewsView on X
  • May 13, 2026

    バイバインを使用すると、210分後には栗饅頭の数が約4兆4000億個と人類の総重量を超え、430分後には約77杼個と地球の質量を超える。 そして開始から約23時間後には4.9×10の83乗個に到達し、観測可能な宇宙の体積を超える。わずか1日足らずで宇宙が栗饅頭に埋め尽くされてしまう。

    2.7K40411099360K viewsView on X
  • Aug 15, 2026

    NASAの火星探査機MROによって撮影された火星の衛星フォボス。フォボスから約6,800km離れた場所から撮影されています。 https://t.co/SrYZlk1lDS

    2.9K2963829155K viewsView on X
  • Jul 15, 2026

    洞窟で遭遇したヤバい奴ら https://t.co/bdu5yDxvyS

    2.3K942615616K viewsView on X
  • May 26, 2026

    探査機カッシーニが赤外線で撮影した土星 https://t.co/z73UpicUU7

    1.7K175101257K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 6.0K interactions against 292K followers, an engagement rate of 2.07%. Measured over 10 original posts, its engagement rate beats 97% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 201K times each, and 3.01% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 68.6% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.73 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 37% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 10:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 10 posts sampled, 90% carry an image or video, 50% are part of a thread and 20% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 31K interactions, about 5.1x its own typical post.

What is VAIENCE バイエンス's engagement rate on X?
VAIENCE バイエンス (@vaiencechannel) has an engagement rate of 2.07%, based on the median interactions across 10 original posts from the last 30 days against 292,323 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 2.07%, VAIENCE バイエンス sits above the 75th percentile of the 66,258 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @vaiencechannel have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 97% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts), which puts it in the top 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @vaiencechannel post?
Most posts go out around 10:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.73 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going