v0 engagement report
@v0 - 117K followers on X
Measured over 3 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 7, 2026.
Engagement
Early reading. We have captured 3 original posts for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.
A typical post picks up 168 interactions against 117K followers, an engagement rate of 0.143%. Posts are seen about 27K times each, and 0.618% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 23.2% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.33 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 20% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 3 posts sampled, 67% carry an image or video, 33% are part of a thread and 33% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2.0K interactions, about 12x its own typical post. Only 3 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.
Measured over 3 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 7, 2026.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.143%, v0 sits above the 50th percentile of the 156,969 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.128% to 0.604%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.003% |
| 25th percentile | 0.022% |
| 50th percentile | 0.128% |
| 75th percentile | 0.604% |
| 90th percentile | 2.32% |
| 99th percentile | 83.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 17:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 67% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 33% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | no effect | -2% to -1% | 42K |
- 67% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 33% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 208 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Jul 18, 202612x their median
We ran Kimi K3 on a private cybersecurity benchmark. TL;DR: Kimi K3 is the workhorse for cyber security tasks at great recall/precision/price. GPT 5.6 is best recall/precision but at 7x higher cost per run. For context, https://t.co/UMvysvNW5w is an open-source cyber harness designed for finding vulnerabilities in large codebases. The eval runs deepsec on an undisclosed open-core application at a git sha before a large number of security issues were fixed. This is a secret eval that cannot be directly benchmark-maxxed. S-Tier: GPT 5.6 Sol: By far the most thorough analysis, but coming in at over 7x the price of the runner up. Best price/recall: Kimi K3. Next tier of recall at a good price Best price at good recall: GLM 5.2 (40% lower price than Kimi K3) GPT 5.5: Only recommended with subscription or high-discount API price. Similar recall to Kimi at much higher list price. Opus 4.8: Only recommended with subscription or high-discount API price. Similar recall to GLM 5.2 at much higher list price. Fable 5: 100% refusal rate. Cannot be used for security analysis. Sol on a large code base will quickly get into 6-figure pricing. This is still affordable relative to the risk of letting security issues unfixed or paying bug bounties. I'd recommend using Sol for a one-time baseline and then using Kimi K3 for continuous analysis. When using open-weight models, make sure to use an inference vendor that supports zero data retention.
- Jun 25, 20267.0x their median
v0 Design Systems 2.0 is here. Import your design system from GitHub, npm, Storybook, Figma, and more. Build with your real components, colors, fonts, and patterns. https://t.co/qkeeY3G9aL
- Jun 17, 20266.6x their median
Introducing v0's new design mode. The power of an agent, with the precision of a design tool. https://t.co/RWB06pMmOj
- Sep 29, 20264.9x their median
You can now use your ChatGPT subscription in v0. Connect your account and start building with your ChatGPT tokens. Available for ChatGPT Plus or Pro plans. https://t.co/Zp9NeuU6LI
- Aug 3, 20263.0x their median
Introducing the new v0 API. Programmatic access to v0's app-building capabilities: • Start a chat from a prompt, repo, or ZIP • Render a dev server preview • Send follow-up messages • Deploy to Vercel https://t.co/L7zJulyglS
- Jul 10, 20262.7x their median
https://t.co/GVD3MoLCHN
- Jul 24, 20262.2x their median
v0 can now turn a full Figma file into a working app. With a single link, the agent explores your pages and frames, picks what it needs, and builds the screens as one app. https://t.co/2GF8vWVuWz
- Sep 4, 20262.0x their median
GPT-6 Astra is now available on v0. Try it at https://t.co/QOp8bfPLjW https://t.co/01yWfEhHyz
- Aug 31, 20261.8x their median
v0 is now available in Claude Design. Send your designs to v0, turn them into full-stack apps, and deploy to production. https://t.co/gu22NP2hP1
- Jun 11, 20261.6x their median
The biggest summer in soccer (err… fútbol) starts today. Build the best soccer app, game, or agent with v0 and win $1,000 in credits. Reply with your creation by June 19. https://t.co/Sx36y7fNEc
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 168 interactions against 117K followers, an engagement rate of 0.143%. Posts are seen about 27K times each, and 0.618% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 23.2% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.33 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 20% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 3 posts sampled, 67% carry an image or video, 33% are part of a thread and 33% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2.0K interactions, about 12x its own typical post. Only 3 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.
- What is v0's engagement rate on X?
- v0 (@v0) has an engagement rate of 0.143%, based on the median interactions across 3 original posts from the last 30 days against 117,075 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.143%, v0 sits above the 50th percentile of the 156,969 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @v0 have real engagement?
- There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
- When does @v0 post?
- Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.33 posts per day across the measured window.