Back to @uodenim's profile

้ญšใƒ‡ใƒ‹ใƒ ๐ŸŸ engagement report

@uodenim - 497K followers on X

Measured over 31 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 28, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.007%
of 497K followers
Per impression
0.198%
19K views on a typical post
Reach
3.77%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
37
interactions (median)
Saved
0.011%
2 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.37/day
active 30% of days
Peak time
14:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 37 interactions against 497K followers, an engagement rate of 0.007%. Measured over 31 original posts, its engagement rate beats 27% of 3,810 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 19K times each, and 0.198% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.77% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.4 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 31 posts sampled, 13% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 8.8K interactions, about 238x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #ramiel, #zzzero, #ใ‚ผใƒณใ‚ผใƒญ.

Measured over 31 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 28, 2026. Recurring tags: #ramiel, #zzzero, #ใ‚ผใƒณใ‚ผใƒญ.

Compared with accounts its own size

้ญšใƒ‡ใƒ‹ใƒ ๐ŸŸ's engagement rate beats 27% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,810 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 16% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.007%, ้ญšใƒ‡ใƒ‹ใƒ ๐ŸŸ sits above the 10th percentile of the 36,852 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.012%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.08%
p750.435%
p902.10%
p99159.8%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 36,852 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 106,564 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.08%
75th percentile0.435%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile159.8%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 14:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%51K
01:00 UTC-2%52K
02:00 UTC-3%50K
03:00 UTC-4%54K
04:00 UTC-6%43K
05:00 UTC-4%42K
06:00 UTC-4%48K
07:00 UTC-5%52K
08:00 UTC-4%61K
09:00 UTC-3%70K
10:00 UTC-2%72K
11:00 UTC-3%79K
12:00 UTC-2%87K
13:00 UTC-3%95K
14:00 UTC-4%98K
15:00 UTC-2%101K
16:00 UTC-4%99K
17:00 UTC-2%91K
18:00 UTC-1%85K
19:00 UTC-1%80K
20:00 UTC-1%75K
21:00 UTC-1%66K
22:00 UTC-2%58K
23:00 UTC-2%52K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+4%232K
Monday0%290K
Tuesday-2%281K
Wednesday-1%252K
Thursday-2%245K
Friday-3%254K
Saturday+3%228K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Aug 24, 2026238x their median

    2016ๅนดใƒฏใ‚ค ใ€Œ10ๅนดๅพŒใฎ่‡ชๅˆ†ใฏใฉใ‚“ใชใตใ†ใซใชใฃใฆใ‚‹ใ‚“ใ ใ‚ใ†โ€ฆ๏ผใ€ 2026ๅนดใƒฏใ‚ค ใ€Œ๐Ÿซฑ๐Ÿ‘ฉ๐ŸซฒใŠๅ‰ใ‚„ใ‚Šใพใ™ใญใ‡ใ‚นใ‚ฎใ€

    7.8K9491345244K viewsView on X
  • Aug 11, 202620x their median

    ใƒ‡ใ‚ถใ‚คใƒณๅŠใณ็›ฃไฟฎใ•ใ›ใฆใ„ใŸใ ใใพใ—ใŸใ€ŽๆœงใƒซใƒŠใ€ใŒไบˆ็ด„ๅ—ไป˜ไธญใงใ™ใ€‚ ่ˆˆๅ‘ณใฎใ‚ใ‚‹ๆ–นใฏใœใฒ๏ผ ไบˆ็ด„ใƒšใƒผใ‚ธURL https://t.co/ksNdiB3oLG https://t.co/RgVJkDgb0I

    651733046K viewsView on X
  • Aug 13, 202620x their median

    ็ตตๆŸ„ใŒไปŠ้ขจใงๅฏๆ„›ใใฆใ€็”ปๅŠ›ใ‚‚็ด ๆ™ดใ‚‰ใ—ใ„ใฎใซๆ€ง็™–ใŒใถใฃ้ฃ›ใ‚“ใงใ‚‹(ไธ€่ˆฌใ‹ใ‚‰ๆ•ฌ้ ใ•ใ‚Œใ‚‹ใƒฌใƒ™ใƒซ)ไบบ่ฆ‹ใ‹ใ‘ใ‚‹ใจ ใ€ŒใŠๅ‰ใฏไธ–็•Œ็š„ใช้ธๆ‰‹ใซใชใ‚Œใ‚‹ใ‚“ใ ใž๏ผ๏ผŸใ€ ใ€Œใ„ใ„ใ‚“ใงใ™โ€ฆไฟบใฏใ“ใฎๆ‘ใฎๅฐใ•ใชใƒใƒผใƒ ใŒใ™ใ”ใๆฐ—ใซๅ…ฅใฃใฆใฆใ€ใ“ใ“ใฎใฟใ‚“ใชใจใ‚„ใ‚‹ใฎใŒๅฅฝใใชใ‚“ใงใ™โ€ฆ^^ใ€ ใฟใŸใ„ใชใƒ‰ใƒฉใƒžๅฑ•้–‹ใฎๆฐ—ๆŒใกใซใชใ‚‹ใ€‚

    5831289349K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 202614x their median

    ๆ‰“ใกๅˆใ‚ใ›ใฎ้š›ใซใ€Žๆ”พ่ชฒๅพŒใ‚ญใƒฃใƒƒใƒˆใ‚ฌใƒผใƒซใ€ๆœงใƒซใƒŠใ€ใƒ‡ใ‚ณใƒžใ‚นใ‚’ๆ’ฎๅฝฑใ•ใ›ใฆ้ ‚ใใพใ—ใŸใ€‚ ่‚‰ใฎๆŸ”ใ‚‰ใ‹ใ•ใจใ€ๅพฎๅฆ™ใซๆฑ—ใฐใ‚“ใงใ‚‹ใ‚ˆใ†ใชๅ…‰ๆฒขใŒ็ด ๆ•ตใงใ™๏ผ https://t.co/2KutBvfO4O

    471362016K viewsView on X
  • Aug 17, 202613x their median

    ใ‚ตใƒณใƒชใ‚ชใ‚ญใƒฃใƒฉใจๅŒ–ใ—ใŸBBใกใ‚ƒใ‚“ใปใ‚“ใจใ™ใ(ๅ…ฌๅผ) https://t.co/o5zcoETFws

    458353022K viewsView on X
  • Aug 11, 202611x their median

    ๆœใฎ๏ผ—ๆ™‚ใใ‚‰ใ„ใซ่กŒใฃใŸใ‚“ใ ใ‘ใฉใ€ๆตทๅค–ใƒ‹ใ‚ญใŒmain titleๅฃใšใ•ใฟใชใŒใ‚‰ๅ†™็œŸๆ’ฎใฃใฆใฆๅฏๆ„›ใ‹ใฃใŸใ€‚ ๆฐ—ๆŒใกใ‚ใฃใฃใกใ‚ƒใ‚ใ‹ใ‚‹ใ€‚ https://t.co/bNKgDr8dPL

    362320033K viewsView on X
  • Aug 12, 20266.0x their median

    ไปŠๅ›žใฎใƒ“ใ‚ทใƒงใƒผใƒใฟใŸใ„ใซใ€ใกใ‚“ใกใ‚“ใซ็›ดๆŽฅ่ชžใ‚Šใ‹ใ‘ใฆใใ‚‹ใƒ‡ใ‚ถใ‚คใƒณใฃใฆๆ˜”ใจๆฏ”ในใ‚‹ใจๆธ›ใฃใŸใ‚ˆใชใใ€‚ ใŠ่‰ฒๆฐ—่ฆ็ด ใ„ใ‚‰ใชใ„ๅ‹ขใŒๅข—ใˆใŸใ‹ใ‚‰ใ‹ใ€‚

    206151150K viewsView on X
  • Aug 16, 20263.9x their median

    ๆœๆ–นใซ่…ฐใŒ็ˆ†ๆ•ฃใ—ใฆไปŠใซ่‡ณใ‚‹ใ€‚ ๅคงๅˆ†่ฝใก็€ใ„ใŸใŒใ€ๆœๆ–นใฏใƒ™ใƒƒใƒ‰ใ‹ใ‚‰้™ใ‚Šใ‚‹ใฎใ‚‚ไพฟๅบงใซๅบงใ‚‹ใฎใ‚‚ๆœฌๅฝ“ใซใ‚ญใƒ„ใ‹ใฃใŸโ€ฆ ใ‚ฎใƒƒใ‚ฏใƒช่…ฐใฃใฆ็ฌ‘ใ„ใฎใ‚ชใƒใซไฝฟใ‚ใ‚ŒใŸใ‚Šใ™ใ‚‹ใ‘ใฉใ€ใ„ใ–่‡ชๅˆ†ใŒไฝ“้จ“ใ—ใฆใฟใ‚‹ใจใพใฃใŸใ็ฌ‘ใˆใ‚“โ€ฆใŒใกใ—ใ‚“ใฉใ„

    123616022K viewsView on X
  • Aug 14, 20263.6x their median

    ใƒฏใ‚คๅƒ่‘‰็œŒๆฐ‘ใ€ๅƒ่‘‰ใŒๅคง้›จใงๆ‚ฒๆƒจใชใ“ใจใซใชใ‚‹ใ‚‚ใ€่‡ชๅˆ†ใฎไฝใ‚“ใงใ‚‹ๅœฐๅŸŸใŒ็„กๆ•ตใ™ใŽใฆใ„ใพใ„ใกๅฎŸๆ„ŸใŒใชใ„ใ€‚ ๆ˜จๅคœใฏ้ฟ้›ฃใƒฌใƒ™ใƒซ5ใพใง่กŒใฃใŸใ‘ใฉๅคšๅˆ†ๅคงไธˆๅคซใ‚„ใ‚ใฎ็ฒพ็ฅžใ ใฃใŸใ€‚ ๆ˜ ็”ปใง็œŸใฃๅ…ˆใซใ‚พใƒณใƒ“ใซๅ–ฐใ‚ใ‚Œใ‚‹ใ‚ฟใ‚คใƒ—ใ ใจๆ€ใ†ใ€‚

    12591022K viewsView on X
  • Aug 15, 20262.6x their median

    ใ€Œใƒ›ใƒฉใƒผๆ˜ ็”ปใฏ8ๅ‰ฒใŒ้ง„ไฝœใงใ‚ใ‚‹ใ€ใใ‚‰ใ„ใฎๆ„Ÿ่ฆšใง่ฆณใฆใ‚‹ใ‚“ใ ใ‘ใฉใ€ใŸใพใซใ‚ธใƒฃใƒณใƒ—ใ‚นใ‚ฑใ‚ขใซ้ ผใ‚‰ใšใ‚ฌใƒใชใ‚„ใค่ฆ‹ใ‹ใ‘ใ‚‹ใจๆ„Ÿๅ‹•ใŒใงใ‹ใ„ใ€‚ ใ€ŽใƒŸใƒณใƒŠใฎใ‚ฆใ‚ฟใ€ใฃใฆใ‚„ใคใŒๅ€‹ไบบ็š„ใซใฏใ‹ใชใ‚Šๆ€–ใใฆ่‰ฏใ‹ใฃใŸใ€‚ ็€ไฟกใ‚ขใƒชใจใ‹ใ‚ใฎๆ‰‹ใฎใ‚ธใƒฃใƒ‘ใƒ‹ใƒผใ‚บใƒ›ใƒฉใƒผๅฅฝใใซใฏๅˆบใ•ใ‚‹ใจๆ€ใ†ใ€‚

    8672126K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#ramiel#zzzero#ใ‚ผใƒณใ‚ผใƒญ

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 37 interactions against 497K followers, an engagement rate of 0.007%. Measured over 31 original posts, its engagement rate beats 27% of 3,810 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 19K times each, and 0.198% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.77% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.4 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 31 posts sampled, 13% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 8.8K interactions, about 238x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #ramiel, #zzzero, #ใ‚ผใƒณใ‚ผใƒญ.

What is ้ญšใƒ‡ใƒ‹ใƒ ๐ŸŸ's engagement rate on X?
้ญšใƒ‡ใƒ‹ใƒ ๐ŸŸ (@uodenim) has an engagement rate of 0.007%, based on the median interactions across 31 original posts from the last 30 days against 496,519 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.007%, ้ญšใƒ‡ใƒ‹ใƒ ๐ŸŸ sits above the 10th percentile of the 36,852 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @uodenim have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 27% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,810 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @uodenim post?
Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.37 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going