Umar Saif engagement report
@umarsaif - 211K followers on X
Measured over 14 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 5, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 73 interactions against 211K followers, an engagement rate of 0.035%. Measured over 14 original posts, its engagement rate beats 41% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 6.3K times each, and 1.16% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.98% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.57 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 40% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 10:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 14 posts sampled, 29% carry an image or video and 36% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 81K interactions, about 1108x its own typical post.
Measured over 14 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 5, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
Umar Saif's engagement rate beats 41% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 47% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.035%, Umar Saif sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,261 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.678% |
| 90th percentile | 2.55% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 10:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 29% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 36% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | +15% | +14% to +16% | 32K |
- 29% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 36% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 472 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Jun 14, 20261108x their median
Following intensive talks, we are pleased to announce that the Peace Deal between the United States of America and Islamic Republic of Iran has been REACHED. Both sides have declared the immediate and permanent termination of military operations on all fronts, including in Lebanon. The official signing ceremony will be on Friday, 19 June in Switzerland. We would like to thank the United States of America and the Islamic Republic of Iran for their commitment to finding a diplomatic solution to the conflict. We would also like to extend our sincere appreciation to our brothers in this mediation effort, the great leadership of State of Qatar, for their support in reaching this agreement. I would also especially thank the visionary leadership of Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and Republic of Türkiye for their immense contributions in this regard. With the agreement now in place, mediators will facilitate a series of meetings this week. These pre-implementation discussions will lay the foundation for the technical talks and the official signing ceremony. @realDonaldTrump @JDVance @SecRubio @SteveWitkoff @SEPeaceMissions @drpezeshkian @mb_ghalibaf @araghchi
- May 29, 2026130x their median
Met with Pakistani Deputy Prime Minister and Foreign Minister @MIshaqDar50 and thanked him for the role Pakistan continues to play in advancing peace in the Middle East. We agreed upon the importance of working together to further strengthen a meaningful partnership for better security and more prosperity for our two nations.
- Jun 17, 202629x their median
ہمیں بھی یاد کر لینا چمن میں جب بہار آئے ... https://t.co/iG7NcLTQwu
- May 6, 202614x their median
Well done Pakistan! The war is over!!!
- Aug 7, 202614x their median
What Pakistan has pulled off diplomatically is extraordinary — and should be studied as a case study in international relations. Islamabad has managed to remain deeply aligned with China, retain exceptionally close ties with Saudi Arabia and Türkiye, rebuild relevance in Washington, and at the same time keep a working relationship with Tehran. Think about how unusual that is. These are countries whose interests frequently collide, yet Pakistan has resisted being boxed into a single geopolitical camp. In an era defined by blocs, sanctions, rivalries and demands to choose sides, Pakistan has created strategic space for itself across nearly every major axis of power that matters to it. That is not diplomatic balancing at the margins. It is geopolitical leverage.
- May 10, 20266.8x their median
Every major economic opportunity in Pakistan was turned into a rent-seeking scheme for the elite. 1. Pakistan borrows billions. Instead of building exports, industry, and skilled human capital, the money disappears into mega-projects loaded with commissions. Result: Every few years, Pakistan returns to the IMF with a begging bowl — while the elite parks wealth offshore. 2. Pakistan’s industry needed cheap electricity to compete globally. Instead, the system rewarded IPPs and guaranteed capacity payments for a connected few. Result: IPP owners got richer. Industry got crushed under expensive power. Exports stagnated. 3. Farmers needed affordable fertiliser. Gas subsidies were supposed to support agriculture. Instead, subsidies became a pipeline for elite profits. Result: Fertiliser cartels thrived. Agricultural productivity and exports barely moved. 4. Pakistan could have become a regional trade corridor linking Afghanistan and Central Asia. Instead, transit trade became a smuggling and money-laundering racket. Result: Dollar flight, black markets, trade deficits, and a stagnant economy. 5. Pakistan needed world-class education and employable skills. Instead, degree factories multiplied while public universities decayed. Result: Over 75,000 IT graduates every year — fewer than 5,000 employable. The tragedy of Pakistan is not lack of opportunity. It is that every opportunity became a business model for extraction instead of national growth. We now have another opportunity with Pakistan's new found place at the center of world diplomacy and importance -- let's not squander this!
- Jun 11, 20269.4x their median
In a country where every major expenditure and asset ownership -- from a cellphone bill to property tax to driving license to electricity usage to bank accounts to hotel stays to travel to school fees to traffic tickets -- is tied to your biometricaly verified ID card, how difficult could it be to ascertain someone's income -- and, hence, income tax? How many more years will we continue to reimagine FBR or spend billions on "reform" -- before someone actually calls the bluff ...
- May 5, 20263.4x their median
In “Understanding the Rafale Kills”, Warnes detailed how the PAF effectively trapped the IAF pilots in their ‘kill chain’ by controlling three of the IAF satellites, severing downlinks and neutralizing GPS signals, before PAF cyber warriors.. penetrated critical systems, disrupting banks, energy grids, railways, and airlines" https://t.co/2hPYiT5V3F
- Sep 19, 20265.9x their median
Two wars looming around the corner. One in East. One in West. Worrying times ahead ...
- Oct 3, 20265.5x their median
We have become far too good at celebrating mediocrity in higher education. I see Pakistani universities proudly advertising a place among the world’s top 1,000. Is that really the height of our ambition? And when Hazara University in Mansehra and LUMS end up in the same ranking band, I have serious questions about what these rankings actually measure. Pakistan needs to pull up its socks. Improve teaching. Produce meaningful research. And get serious about submitting accurate, complete, verifiable data to international ranking organisations. Our students deserve better than a higher education system that celebrates mediocrity while squandering their potential …
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 73 interactions against 211K followers, an engagement rate of 0.035%. Measured over 14 original posts, its engagement rate beats 41% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 6.3K times each, and 1.16% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.98% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.57 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 40% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 10:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 14 posts sampled, 29% carry an image or video and 36% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 81K interactions, about 1108x its own typical post.
- What is Umar Saif's engagement rate on X?
- Umar Saif (@umarsaif) has an engagement rate of 0.035%, based on the median interactions across 14 original posts from the last 30 days against 211,278 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.035%, Umar Saif sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,261 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @umarsaif have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 41% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @umarsaif post?
- Most posts go out around 10:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.57 posts per day across the measured window.