Back to @uksciencechief's profile

Government Office for Science engagement report

@uksciencechief - 165K followers on X

Measured over 1 original post from a 30-day window, last computed on October 23, 2026.

Engagement

Per follower
0.003%
of 165K followers
Per impression
0.167%
3.0K views on a typical post
Reach
1.82%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
5
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.03/day
active 3% of days
Peak time
10:00 UTC
Wednesday

Early reading. We have captured 1 original post for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.

A typical post picks up 5 interactions against 165K followers, an engagement rate of 0.003%. Posts are seen about 3.0K times each, and 0.167% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.82% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.03 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 3% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 10:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 1 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 6.4K interactions, about 1281x its own typical post. Only 1 original post have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

Measured over 1 original post from a 30-day window, last computed on October 23, 2026.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.003%, Government Office for Science sits below the 10th percentile of the 204,694 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.677%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,694 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,880 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.677%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 10:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 10:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 10:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link100% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 100% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 223 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Oct 8, 20251281x their median

    Susumu Kitagawa, Richard Robson and Omar M. Yaghi have been awarded the 2025 #NobelPrize in Chemistry for the development of a new type of molecular architecture. In 1989, chemistry laureate Richard Robson tested utilising the inherent properties of atoms in a new way. He combined positively charged copper ions with a four-armed molecule; this had a chemical group that was attracted to copper ions at the end of each arm. When they were combined, they bonded to form a well-ordered, spacious crystal. It was like a diamond filled with innumerable cavities.

    4.5K1.7K62134639K viewsView on X
  • Oct 7, 2025247x their median

    “I can’t imagine accepting the prize without them.” In this interview shortly after the prize announcement, new physics laureate John Clarke is still stunned by the news. He praises his co-laureates John Martinis and Michel Devoret, who he worked together with at a lab in Berkeley, California, some 40 years ago. Clarke recollects the many discussions and extensive work that eventually led to their Nobel Prize-awarded discoveries. “It took us a long time to get all of this worked out. None of this work would have happened without the two of them.” Listen to the interview here. #NobelPrize

    983219181492K viewsView on X
  • Jul 14, 202557x their median

    The Met Office State of the UK Climate Report for 2024 shows that record breaking and extreme weather has become increasingly commonplace in the UK as our climate has changed over the last few decades Published today by @wileyinresearch in @RMetS Learn more 👇

    10859962293K viewsView on X
  • Nov 19, 202546x their median

    We’re excited to introduce our new CEO: Kathleen Fisher. ARIA is at an inflection point. We’re moving from launching ambitious research to driving it forward. Kathleen is the ideal leader to scale our work. She led DARPA’s HACMS programme – successfully defending a helicopter from elite hackers mid-flight. It was later named DARPA’s most influential of the past decade. This new chapter is only possible thanks to our founding CEO, @ilangur, who turned ARIA from a concept into a reality. We’re deeply grateful for his stewardship. He remains as CEO until Kathleen joins in February 2026. Read more: https://t.co/sVfkA8TNwU

    1662892783K viewsView on X
  • Oct 22, 202518x their median

    1/2 Emily Shuckburgh has joined as our new Chief Scientific Adviser. She joins from @Cambridge_Uni where she is Director of @CambridgeZero, their climate change initiative. She is also Professor of Environmental Data Science at the Department of Computer Science & Technology. https://t.co/ZIq7cLGqhA

    153521835K viewsView on X
  • Jul 16, 202514x their median

    The UK’s life sciences industry is worth over £100 billion and is a powerhouse for our economy. Our new Life Sciences Sector Plan will implement a new strategy to drive growth, track progress, and deliver better healthcare for everyone. https://t.co/yRqmwlL1eN

    391831234K viewsView on X
  • Feb 11, 202610x their median

    Happy @UN International Day of Women and Girls in Science. Celebrating the curiosity, talent and leadership of women across science, engineering and technology. #WomenInScience #GirlsInScience #11February #CelebratingScienceAdvice #WomenInSTEM https://t.co/ukSjKEJzE1

    3114424.7K viewsView on X
  • Dec 16, 20257.8x their median

    The UK tech sector is thriving - but not for everyone. Technology Secretary @leicesterliz convened the first meeting of the Women in Tech Taskforce, a flagship initiative to dismantle barriers and unlock the full talent pool. This taskforce will deliver practical solutions for government and industry to implement side by side.

    2011629.6K viewsView on X
  • Dec 2, 20254.8x their median

    Professor Patricia Thornley has been appointed Chief Scientific Adviser at @transportgovuk. She brings extensive expertise across sustainable energy and clean transport which will help shape evidence‑based policy and advance the UK’s transition to net zero. Her role will be central to ensuring that excellent science advice sits at the heart of decision‑making and strengthen coordination across departments through the Chief Scientific Adviser Network.

    164227.9K viewsView on X
  • Jul 21, 20254.4x their median

    📢 Only 1⃣ week left to apply for the role of @ukhomeoffice Chief Scientific Adviser! Check out this exciting opportunity to lead on science advice for the department and apply here before midday on 28 July: https://t.co/F6GrVXpMPX https://t.co/xBhfwaN18V

    1111005.0K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 5 interactions against 165K followers, an engagement rate of 0.003%. Posts are seen about 3.0K times each, and 0.167% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.82% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.03 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 3% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 10:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 1 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 6.4K interactions, about 1281x its own typical post. Only 1 original post have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

What is Government Office for Science's engagement rate on X?
Government Office for Science (@uksciencechief) has an engagement rate of 0.003%, based on the median interactions across 1 original posts from the last 30 days against 164,586 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.003%, Government Office for Science sits below the 10th percentile of the 204,694 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @uksciencechief have real engagement?
There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
When does @uksciencechief post?
Most posts go out around 10:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.03 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going