Back to @udsnoexisten's profile

Nicolás Samper engagement report

@udsnoexisten - 285K followers on X

Measured over 14 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 6, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.059%
of 285K followers
Per impression
1.01%
17K views on a typical post
Reach
5.83%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
168
interactions (median)
Saved
0.069%
12 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.6/day
active 53% of days
Peak time
17:00 UTC
Saturday

A typical post picks up 168 interactions against 285K followers, an engagement rate of 0.059%. Measured over 14 original posts, its engagement rate beats 52% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 17K times each, and 1.01% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.83% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 53% of days. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 14 posts sampled, 57% carry an image or video and 29% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 3.7K interactions, about 22x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #castro, #ulibro2026.

Measured over 14 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 6, 2026. Recurring tags: #castro, #ulibro2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Nicolás Samper's engagement rate beats 52% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 46% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.059%, Nicolás Samper sits above the 25th percentile of the 66,128 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.016% to 0.1%.

p100.002%
p250.016%
p50 (median)0.1%
p750.499%
p902.09%
p99119.9%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 66,128 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 57,111 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.016%
50th percentile0.1%
75th percentile0.499%
90th percentile2.09%
99th percentile119.9%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 17:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 17:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 17:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Saturday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Saturday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video57% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link29% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 57% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 29% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 266 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 18, 202622x their median

    La increíble mentira con la que el Bolton engañó a Jay-Jay Okocha en 2002. 🇳🇬🎩 En el mercado de verano de 2002, el Bolton Wanderers logró uno de los fichajes más random, espectaculares y nostálgicos de la historia de la Premier League: Jay-Jay Okocha. El nigeriano venía de tirar magia en el PSG junto a Ronaldinho. Quedó libre y quería jugar en Inglaterra, pero cometió un error letal para la era pre-Google: firmó sin investigar absolutamente nada sobre el club. Okocha pensaba que el Bolton era un gigante europeo. Y la directiva armó un plan maestro de engaño para que no se diera cuenta de la realidad. 1. La mentira de Old Trafford 🏟️ Durante las videollamadas, el director deportivo le vendió que el Bolton estaba "a solo 10 minutos de Old Trafford". Jay-Jay, sin conocer la geografía inglesa, asumió automáticamente que si estaban al lado del Manchester United, tenían que ser un club del mismo nivel de grandeza y estatus. 2. La visita hipercontrolada 🕵️‍♂️ Para que no sospechara, el Bolton organizó un viaje milimétrico. Lo recogieron en el aeropuerto y lo llevaron DIRECTO al Reebok Stadium, que en esa época era un estadio moderno y hermoso. Le mostraron el hotel del club y los palcos. El nigeriano quedó maravillado. Pero el club le ocultó deliberadamente el lugar donde realmente pasaría sus días: el predio de entrenamiento. Sabían que si Okocha lo veía, se subía al avión de vuelta a París. 3. El choque con la realidad 🪵 El engaño se cayó el primer día de pretemporada. Al llegar a la ciudad deportiva, Okocha descubrió que las instalaciones eran prehistóricas: •El vestuario de los jugadores era una cabaña prefabricada (un contenedor de metal). •Las duchas eran tan pequeñas que solo cabían 3 futbolistas a la vez. Las estrellas tenían que hacer fila para bañarse. "¿Qué carajos hago aquí? Dejé a mi familia en París por esto", confesó Okocha años después entre risas. Para colmo, el estilo rústico del DT Sam Allardyce casi le da un infarto al principio. A pesar de la trampa, el "Mago" se enamoró del club, se plantó la cinta de capitán, salvó al equipo del descenso y se convirtió en una leyenda eterna del fútbol de culto. Una época dorada e irrepetible. ⚽✨ https://t.co/0vqc2hFvik

    3.4K3171410274K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 202616x their median

    Esta es la cantidad (mínima) de pedos que debemos tirarnos al día. https://t.co/9BKEPCkIpH

    2.0K462117115312K viewsView on X
  • May 31, 20247.0x their median

    Hoy estoy muy feliz porque el trabajo que hicimos llamado “el país del 5-0” al lado de @christiangadejo quedó entre los 10 mejores de Latinoamérica en los “AIPS Sport Media Awards”. Les dejo el link si lo quieren oír. https://t.co/ZbrGyc0OsI https://t.co/kerpFi9Ico

    958162583144K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 20265.8x their median

    Estoy buscando una oportunidad para dirigir Millonarios. Les prometo esta Liga Colombiana. Les prometo para ustedes la primera Copa Libertadores en el 2027. Tengo un sistema de juego que es muy diferente al de ustedes. ESTRATEGIAS.

    780875657145K viewsView on X
  • Aug 17, 20261.7x their median

    Jorge Bermúdez (Roberto Abbondancieri). Colombia vs Boca (17/03/98). https://t.co/FcdXX49JYp

    257138184K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 2026

    "Dios mío" Por el increíble error de Joaquín Papaleo, arquero de Gimnasia y Tiro de Salta, ante Chacarita, que no terminó en gol porque la pelota ya se había ido. https://t.co/CU9Xfra8Qp

    174101124327K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 2026

    📼 Todos los goles del Mundial de España 1982 https://t.co/CcPzLOJJRR

    131481923K viewsView on X
  • Sep 5, 2026

    Qué partidazo Inter-Napoli

    15271408.7K viewsView on X
  • Aug 20, 2026

    El crudo testimonio de Jonathan Gómez sobre su lucha contra la ludopatía: "Perdí todo" - TyC Sports https://t.co/S7X9hYH1AI

    1142461993K viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 2026

    ¡Habemus show! El próximo 26 de septiembre volvemos a estar en vivo en BOOM. Los esperamos. Lleven sus mejores camisetas de fútbol, como es habitual. En el link pueden adquirir su boleta. https://t.co/DMpx64xKGX

    796606.3K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#castro#ulibro2026

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 168 interactions against 285K followers, an engagement rate of 0.059%. Measured over 14 original posts, its engagement rate beats 52% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 17K times each, and 1.01% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.83% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 53% of days. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 14 posts sampled, 57% carry an image or video and 29% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 3.7K interactions, about 22x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #castro, #ulibro2026.

What is Nicolás Samper's engagement rate on X?
Nicolás Samper (@udsnoexisten) has an engagement rate of 0.059%, based on the median interactions across 14 original posts from the last 30 days against 285,009 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.059%, Nicolás Samper sits above the 25th percentile of the 66,128 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @udsnoexisten have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 52% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @udsnoexisten post?
Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.6 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going